MikroTik

picacho99

For these experiencing problems installing 6.39rc on RB3011: in my case it only worked netinstall but using the version associated with the 6.39rc in the software dowloads section (it is named netinstall-6.39rcXX-tile.zip). Stable netinstall (currently named netinstall-6.38.5.zip) does not seems to ...

picacho99

I had this problem going from v6.38.4 to 6.38.5 on the RB3011 also. Unfortunantly the router is one of my main routers, and I didn't have a spare so I couldn't debug. In that scenario it is not wise to run RC software... I hope at least you make backups and/or exports and store them on another comp...

picacho99

A RB3011 with a regular configruation when upgraded from v6.38.5 to v6.39.55 or v6.39.58 device becomes unusable: reboots again and again until it is recovered with reset and netinstall.

picacho99

Threre is a sentence in in my country that may applicable.... "What is cheap tipically becomes expensive after short time" While I believe that some time ago Mikrotik was disruptive with his solutions...and won a lot of happy Customers.. Mikrotik today is cheap and disruptive with his Customers...be...

picacho99

Tok tok

picacho99

Tok Tok

picacho99

rb3011 don´t support fasttrack

Sorry, RB3011 don't support fastpath too.

Why not ?
Why MIkrotik announces (still in the MUM) what is only partially supported?
Why ARM platform to run non optimized nor finished software?

picacho99

rb3011 don´t support fasttrack

Sorry, RB3011 don't support fastpath too.

picacho99

My last message in your forums: tired of wasting my time with you and my money on unfinsihed products...

picacho99

Hi Normis, How confident are you that MikroTik will be able to hit Q1 and Q2 expectations on new products listed? Confident...you are kidding? PPOE Client FastPath does not work on RB3011, nor partition, nor performance in line with announcement....: this device was announced Q2-2015, ready for dis...

picacho99

Ooppss *) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support.... ???? it works over RB2011 but it does NOT works over RB3011. Same fiber connection (300/30 Mbits) and RouterOS configuration testing RB2011 and RB3011, with these results: - RB2011...6.34.2 - CPU usage 100% (298 Mits) - RB2011...6.35rc12 - CP...

picacho99

FYI: I did go back with RB2011: is cooler, greener and stable
RB3011 is to collect dust in the black corner of the Office...it works like a charm for this: a really big box, really empty so ready to collect tons of dust.

picacho99

Ooppss *) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support.... ???? it works over RB2011 but it does NOT work over RB3011. Same fiber connection (300/30 Mbits) and RouterOS configuration testing RB2011 and RB3011, with these results: - RB2011...6.34.2 - CPU usage 100% (298 Mits) - RB2011...6.35rc12 - CPU...

picacho99

Ooppss *) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support.... ???? it works over RB2011 but it does NOT works over RB3011. Same fiber connection (300/30 Mbits) and RouterOS configuration testing RB2011 and RB3011, with these results: - RB2011...6.34.2 - CPU usage 100% (298 Mits) - RB2011...6.35rc12 - CP...

picacho99

tok, tok....

picacho99

About this nice feature "*) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support;" Is the RB3011 RouterOS specific version really supporting fastpath ? Why this question: - It not appears listed as supported in the WIKI page on fatspath. - My testing after applying the firewall rules and having the counter ...

picacho99

Hi,
Are these facilities implemented in the ARM version of RouterOS used on RB3011?

This device does not appears listed as supported in the oficial documentation...the WIKI.

picacho99

1- Try with another ethernet cable between the router and the multimedia player.
2- By default.... avoid Tx and Rx Flow Control.....

picacho99

yea i will, do u know if netinstall wipes the entire partition table?

Yes it does.

And additionally just to advise you on RB3011: Partition does not work at all up to date (lasr RC tried too).

picacho99

Definitelly avoid RB3011 or at least wait, let's say, 6 months to know the reality of this device: Yes, it works but... - Partition does not work. - Performance is still under question. - It's not cheap: aprox. 170€ in Europe with taxes but without shipping costs. - New porting: ARM architecture, so...

picacho99

About this nice feature "*) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support;" Is the RB3011 RouterOS specific version really supporting fastpath ? Why this question: - It not appears listed as supported in the WIKI page on fatspath. - My testing after applying the firewall rules and having the counter ...

picacho99

And when you plan to fix this "dirty" SNTP behaviour in RB3011 ? 605 Feb/23/2016 15:45:19 memory system, info sntp change time Feb/23/2016 15:45:16 => Feb/23/2016 15:45:19 606 Feb/23/2016 15:47:30 memory system, info sntp change time Feb/23/2016 15:47:27 => Feb/23/2016 15:47:30 607 Feb/23/2016 15:48...

picacho99

About this nice feature "*) pppoe-client - implemented fastpath support;" Is the RB3011 RouterOS specific version really supporting fastpath ? Why this question: - It not appears listed as supported in the WIKI page on fatspath. - My testing after applying the firewall rules and having the counter g...

picacho99

Sorry but..some basic optimizations that should benefit both RB2011 and RB3011 1- Why you are using a software bridge and not hardware bridge (define ports as slave of master prot) for lan side ports ? 2- Merge firewall rules, for example: when accepting established and related use a single rule ins...

picacho99

Be patient...the rack version still not polished regarding the software: yes, works but partition does not , mono-cpu behaviour handling tcp trafic, issues with nntp client,....

picacho99

My feedback is open and available for anybody that may be interested. If you are right, Mikrotik has lied his customer base because started selling a piece of crap, and I don't believe this is the case. This young device now is working like a charm, at least, for me. ARM platform only means more raw...

picacho99

My updated feedback on RB3011: I'm testing it with a release candidate, the version v6.34rc23 - I removed a bridge on top of my configuration and everything works smoth.... - Now the CPU handling the TCP/IP stream never goes higher than 65% saturating a a fiber connection of 300 Mbits, while online ...

picacho99

Sorry Netinstall againts an RB3011 worked from a Windows 10 64 bits PC....
Just disable the firewall....

picacho99

Unbeliable.. Mikrotik you don't need a social reputation care manager...

picacho99

Mikrotik ?

picacho99

This thread is to discuss about this candidate software version or to collect speculations and personal opinions about the stars in the sky ?! Mikrotik does not like to share, only when "willing" to launch something new ....of course always late and incomplete but to improve definitelly over the tim...

picacho99

Oppsss.....it's so bad so see Microtik silence on RB/3011....Sorry for that, but its does not make sense.

And yes I known...someone will say that when Microtik will have something to say, he willl....but perhaps Mikrotik will not find me more...to hear them because too late.

KInd Regards

picacho99

My experience...it depends on your understanding of "beating"..... I have just, finally, thanks my God, replaced an ERLITE-3 by an RB/3011 on a 300/300 Mbits PPOE/Nated fiber connection with IPTV and IP phone...unbeliable: back to have a router in a corner of my house acting as a router and not cal...

picacho99

My experience...it depends on your understanding of "beating"..... I have just, finally, thanks my God, replaced an ERLITE-3 by an RB/3011 on a 300/300 Mbits PPOE/Nated fiber connection with IPTV and IP phone...unbeliable: back to have a router in a corner of my house acting as a router and not cal...

picacho99

Dear Mikrotik, I did monitor each CPU using System->Resources->CPU and it [flash=]seems [/flash]that all the trafic is handled by one of the CPUs, during my tests it was always the second,....1 , 2, 3 or 4 tcp streams..it does not care: always one CPU appears (really) busy while the other always< 5%...

picacho99

Hi Mikrotik,

WIth RouterOS v6.33.3, Partition does not work: you are allowed to configure the number of partitions but after rebooting you still have a single one.

Regards

picacho99

My experience...it depends on your understanding of "beating"..... - On bugs, yes it beats. offload is unestable and becomes quickly desactivated when using QoS - On non profesional support, yes it beats. - If you want a really hot device, yes it beats. - If you refer to an OS that has not often upd...

picacho99

Toc toc, MIkrotik....Please, let us know something about RB3011 in advance: at this point accurate details should be available, and to share them with us, the Customers, would be perceived as a symthom of confidence from you side.

picacho99

@kiler129....My complaints are not on RouterOS, I like it,really !...but hardware for SOHO environments over fiber.

Please, Mikrotik, give us some visibility about the RB3011.

picacho99

Dear jaykay2342, Sorry but I have not configured IPSec on my device. Dear Zorro99, I got your point, if having to use ERLITEXX in disparate scenarios, profesionally, etc. I'll never go with them for sure: - Software...bad, bery bad documented, a support forum that always leads you to feel stupid or ...

picacho99

My two cents on that...I like Mikroik software but the combination of RouterOS and Mikrotik hardware some times in frustraring: to handle PPP over filber having 300/30 Mbits...One needs to go to across 1100 device ? It is crazy: RB850x2 no comments to add to whast has been discused again and again, ...

picacho99

1- Updated RouterBoof from 3.14 to ar9344_3.18.fwf before. 2- Upgraded from 6.12 to 6.19 without issues in a configuration that is summarize below: - PPP across a fiber provider 100/10Mbits. - IGMP forwarding with several clients. - ABout 50 fireall rules. - Multiple VLANs managed in both the ISP si...

Search found 42 matches