Community discussions

Search found 11 matches

by adrianlewis
Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:55 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request: VRF radius/local user attribute - MPLS IPv6 support - fast reroute - EVPN - and redundancy beside VRRP
Replies: 6
Views: 2442

Re: Feature Request: VRF radius/local user attribute - MPLS IPv6 support - fast reroute - EVPN - and redundancy beside V

The first 4 have been requested many times over the years.
Just in case it makes any difference, here's my +1 again for these
by adrianlewis
Mon May 11, 2015 6:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request - LAC/LNS functionality
Replies: 128
Views: 37214

Re: Feature Request - LAC/LNS functionality

+100
by adrianlewis
Wed Mar 18, 2015 6:19 am
Forum: General
Topic: feature request: VPN/PPP bonding
Replies: 3
Views: 1487

Re: feature request: VPN/PPP bonding

"please add MLPPP support to the PPP server in RouterOS."
+1
by adrianlewis
Fri Dec 05, 2014 6:15 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request: More RADIUS reply attributes
Replies: 5
Views: 1902

Re: Feature request: More RADIUS reply attributes

+1
Especially for VRF.
by adrianlewis
Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:09 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: vrf and dynamic interfaces
Replies: 10
Views: 3672

Re: vrf and dynamic interfaces

I also vote for the radius-attribute like 'Mikrotik-VRF' or 'Routing-Mark'. We need it for PPPoE.
+1
by adrianlewis
Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port
Replies: 9
Views: 4820

Re: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port

OK - Managed to get this working without using any NAT of IP or MAC addresses. Instead I'm using 'ip unnumbered' interfaces on the routerboard or what some call /32 routing in combination with proxy-arp. Let's say we have 4.3.2.1/24 as a network where .1 is the RB IP and the gateway for the virtual ...
by adrianlewis
Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port
Replies: 9
Views: 4820

Re: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port

At the moment, multiple FGT100D cluster pairs which have the physical interfaces available but it's the public IP addresses and physical switch ports that I'm more annoyed about. Instead of 4 switch ports per physical cluster pair (1 x LACP LAG on each cluster member), I'll have to use 8-10 times th...
by adrianlewis
Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port
Replies: 9
Views: 4820

Re: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port

Oh crap (in my head I'm using far stronger words). Yes - I'm using FortiGate VDOMs and yes, all the VLAN interfaces on the same physical port use the same MAC address! The problem with using VDOM links and a transparent VDOM to aggregate them is that you can't use these in an HA cluster with the vcl...
by adrianlewis
Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port
Replies: 9
Views: 4820

Re: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port

Thanks for the info. I've just bought a pair of CCRs and will do some further testing. It's good to hear that it is at least possible (or should be) and this gives me some hope that the issue can be corrected. There were definitely no bridge filter rules but I'm going to test to see if there's any d...
by adrianlewis
Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request for v7.x
Replies: 269
Views: 63598

Re: Feature request for v7.x

- Ability to create PPP interfaces in a specific VRF via RADIUS-Attribute - full L2TP LAC functionality (for forwarding PPPoE sessions via L2TP) BIG +1 from me on these two. CCR Update presentation from MUM US '14 suggests improvements (complete rewrite?) to VRFs which sound like my other main requ...
by adrianlewis
Tue Oct 14, 2014 6:46 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port
Replies: 9
Views: 4820

Bridging VLAN interfaces on the same physical port

Hi, First post here. I'm planning to implement a CCR to allow me to be able to connect multiple virtual firewalls (not Mikrotik) to a single internet IP subnet. The other vendor allows me to create the virtual firewalls with connections to the outside world via a single physical interface, but each ...