had the same issue on winbox
switching over to create peers via CLI (SSH or terminal window in winbox) solved this for me
and also can be quite dangerous if your STP goes nuts then ...I prefer my approach.
Not that much words.
it was, is and always will be thereHow do i delete loop back interface? i am not interested in
have the same one - will have a look how mine behaves this or next weekSame router, all working ok for me, no issue.RB1100dx4de reboots after few seconds, no supout.rif created, no time needed to do this.
that was the problem at first yes. which now works as far as VRFs get to learn imported routes (via RD)@spippan
Let me understate, the issue that you are expiring, is that you are not able to learn the route between different VRFs
do you mean via RADIUS?Please make dynamic vlan assignment possible for wifi-qcom-ac wireless driver
no. why would you think that?If the router does not have a public IP address (4G connection), all traffic is routed through MikroTik servers, right?
viewtopic.php?t=181846#p1051300MikroTik_RouterOSv7.14beta8_BGP_RouteLeak_VRF.png
Hurrah!
E interact with MikroTik devices since 2007-2008...
And Just now... But it is a beginning.
Now we need to check if the behavior is correct with L3VPN / IPv6...
do you consider not being able to leak routes properly between local VRFs (bgp-vpnv4 local) "no known problems"?- There are no known problems with VPNv4 and route reflectors. There is a known/not yet fixed problem with VPLS and route reflectors.
What's new in 7.14beta8 (2024-Jan-22 21:07):
*) bgp - allow to leak routes between local VRFs;
that would make it even MORE vague.MT could just strip that "noise" entries and just write at the end of changelog:
*) misc fixes and improvements
where did you get that from? would like to bookmark that. and also have a friend who might need that soonVery interesting...
Excuse my ignorance, could you be more specific or put the complete scripts?
/system logging set [find where topics="info"] topics=info,!wireguard
maris?Maris, how can we achieve route leaking in RouterOS v7 ?
wrong threadIt is time for USB-EXTRAS package..
USB ethernet adapter and USB wireless adapter drivers seperate package for example realtek branded USB adapters..
did you test it yet? currious if it really worksno more fake loopback bridges required for ospf :)Code: Select all*) system - expose "lo" interface;
exactly.It would be stupid if they have a 128 core ampere doing 90s routing vs running vpp / dpdk.remember, there's new ampere chips coming soon. that might come with some routing surprises as well. I doubt those are being brought it just for control plan on marvell switch chips.
where did normis post that?+ 1
And after 3 years
thanks a lot - i will give this one a try. looks promisingI haven't used it, and it's paid offering, but Unimus (https://unimus.net) does with config stuff AFAIK.do you know of any good alternative or option to do those things like in the form of a centralized controler for routeros?
NO! - but on your network's setup! a mikrotik router NAT configuration from plain functionality (not speaking of performance) is model agnostic....on your router's make and model.
somehow sad and pathetic this has to be told to people (or even those who refer to themselfes as network engineers)never use beta versions in routers that are used in real and important networks. use beta where you can reinstall with netinstall
very impressiveHi! Below is a link to an alternative backup scenario:
https://forummikrotik.ru/viewtopic.php?p=84538#p84538
https://github.com/drpioneer/MikrotikBa ... backup.rsc
feeling confused Unable to comprehend how to respondWhy would it require IPv4 or IPv6 addressing to function?
oh sorry, misunderstoodNo need for that. I would (like the other request) just want to specify an initial phase1 profile.
how would you like to move phase1 settings to phase2 around or vice-versa?
maybe the HARDWARE itself is meant as the "new install" and not the FIRMWARE -.-New install 7.8??? 7.11.2 would be a new install.......
got lucky my 3 CCR1072 at work are still v6 "able"According to https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... l+Overview, this feature is not available yet:
Some kind of mechanism to import/export routes from one vrf to another within same router
ansible can be integrated by today - (rest) api and ssh with pubkey-authFeature: ability to interact with Ansible, and script running capabilities e.g Python/Netmiko for network automation.
do we have any upgrade on this?Yes of course, it will be implemented.
and that is one of the wrongest assumptions ever made considering software development and upgrade-paths
You had one job...
which hardware has this in hw-offload?WG/ChaCha lack support för HW acceleration
thanks for the clarificationyes, but it does not matter for BTH. That is for Cloud DNS feature, unrelated to this topic. BTH does not care if you have public or private IP.
don't know if upon deletion but you have the option to kill a session proactivelyI've seen this on MikroTik, but what about other vendors?
Plain Debian, or whatever or any big vendor. Do they proactively kill user session upon deletion immediately?
it appears to be that way:So what will happen if I enable use-local-address ? The Cloud DNS will be set to my local public ipv4 address?use-local-address is not for Back to Home. It is for Cloud DNS.
yes. that is a welcome addition - hopefully this will come to winbox (and maybe webgui) too*) wireguard - added "wg-add-client" configuration wizard (CLI only);
*) wireguard - added "wg-export" and "wg-import" functionality (CLI only);
Thank you very much.
maybe because is-is performes a bit betterA protocol from 1992. Why not change to OSPFNo IS-IS, no 6VPE. The wait continues...
depends.Re: RB3011 - still a good choice?
: No.
LCD supported on v7 (at least up to 7.10.2)I believe that the LCD screen is not supported on RouterOS 7. So, forget that the screen.
is this some kind of useless trolling?Play with the tools you have.
Reboot.
Done.
+1 tooas @pontus said: "This seems like a basic feature which is available on other platforms."
+1 for this feature
it is literally the first thing the "important note" section states.Tools, Check for updates.
Error: Upgrade file was corrupted.
if i had not pressed SAVE it also would not work in the webGUI.
do you mean:Now you can upgrade to 7.11 beta4 there is fix for the WiFi issue
*) wifiwave2 - fixed interface hangs on IPQ6010-based boards (introduced in v7.9);
goodThe posts already present "speak" for themselves.
...for how long?
...for how long?This time I'll just stop being an asshole, so I don't give any more problems.Is anyone here interested in volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts? Let me know, and let's fight the AI/LLM spam together
BFD activated or BFD not in use at the moment?Still all up and working without problems. (2d 16:54:56)
For now, all BGPs uptime for 19:10:13 without interruption....
as by a lot of recent posts here. i do not get it eitherI never understand why people want free professional consultancy work or even vendor consultancy work on forums.
would this not just rank up convergence timers and overhead?Use OSPF for underlay to learn loopbacks of all adjacent neighbours. Use iBGP to full-mesh with all loopbacks.
blog = new help docs?Blog? I did not know it still existed...Blog entry following soon
it would be just awesome if there would be native support for FRR in MT (like a npk package like the "rose" npk for example!) --- speaking of, is there a topic covering that route?... would have been better to just use FRR instead ...
pardon?Unfortunately they are not allowed.
Otherwise, they will lose the North American market.
for the time being ... if you do not need a certain function only available in v7, there is no big deal staying with v6 atm.Thanks alot guys for the recomendations and guidance. Will upgrade the hex and keep the lites on v6.
thanks! gotta look into the package later tonightOn RouterOS 7.9rc2 file get-custom-defconf
@pnwise
I am going to install OpenWRT on these boxes and will post screenshots on the forum to show the comparison and usability of both.
where did you get that from?What is MikroTik RouterBOARD L009???
I don't know if this will help with RB1100, ....
looking forward to see
I'll get my documentation together and post a new thread so its easily findable.
also working in v7 ?BGP routes recursively resolved on ECMP routes will also be ECMP, see here:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:B ... interfaces
Feature where BGP creates multipath routes (BGP multipath) is not implemented at the moment.
good advice
maybe "metti ordine in casa tua" might be suitable here...Will you stop offending forum users?
he wanted to mark it ITALIC inside a
What is this? "(then also added the LAN subnet + 192.168.1.0/24)"
code
code block text with [i]italic fomating [/i]inside
why would someone need to have that? worse, why even relay such network noise?Ever home user needs mDNS. Don't know why mikrotik keeps ignoring this.even the edgerouter has a mdns repeater..
might be CAP AX (XL)Hmm, I wonder if this video is about the devices controller:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKnYhWnch0Q
would not consider it rock solid but WAY BETTER than OVPN implementationWireguard has been rock solid so far for me on Mikrotik - Would suggest to give it a try!OVPN stability is horrible for me as well...
okay. no cannot see any signatures (also i cannot change mine as i noticed last week)No, from the Netherlands. You can see my username, right?
...or at least help them TEST that thing and provide feedback for that!...Release the d*mn thing so that we can have link failure detection again!
what does it bother you?All junk, your nick and your picture does not say Jones, only you are obsessed with adding it at the bottom, otherwise people would not even know.