Community discussions
L
R
Search found 3 matches
- Thu Dec 11, 2014 12:53 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: NAT by CONTENT NATed more than needed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 558
Re: NAT by CONTENT NATed more than needed
I think i need stateless nat and this not possible to use conntrack rules with rules require non-conntrack option. So sad.
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 11:51 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: DNAT with dst-address unset not working at all
- Replies: 2
- Views: 622
Re: DNAT with dst-address unset not working at all
I did same thing and all works fine. Mangle: chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=req_conn passthrough=yes protocol=tcp src-address=192.168.XXX.0/24 dst-address=193.124.3.1 dst-port= SOME_PORTS_HERE NAT: chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.YYY.ZZZ connection-mark=...
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:12 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: NAT by CONTENT NATed more than needed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 558
NAT by CONTENT NATed more than needed
Hello. I have RouterOS 5.24 and NAT rules like this: RT and KT is names of internet providers (yes, i have 2 wans) ;;; S2 KT chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.xxx.yyy connection-mark=S2_conn_KT ;;; S2 RT chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.xx.yyy connection-mark=S2_conn_R...