Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020

Search found 16 matches

by hechz
Wed Jul 10, 2019 1:16 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

Something is definitely wrong with your RB4011 ... try one more process of running netinstall-6.45.1 .... this will eliminate any form of corruption in the NAND memory and reinstall ROS -- then proceed with your Copper SFP as WAN link to see if that works -- it should and if it does not then I woul...
by hechz
Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:44 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

Something is definitely wrong with your RB4011 ... try one more process of running netinstall-6.45.1 .... this will eliminate any form of corruption in the NAND memory and reinstall ROS -- then proceed with your Copper SFP as WAN link to see if that works -- it should and if it does not then I woul...
by hechz
Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:55 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

My apologies I misunderstood. Is you Cable Gateway in Bridge mode? The power levels are excellent and your RoS code looks good to me. Confirm that your Ethernet cable is good.very strange that you’re not getting the throughput ..... perhaps a defective port, try another port. Also make sure to shut...
by hechz
Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:34 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

I ended having to swap the cisco device back in. Having tried every permutation of interfaces, MSS clamping, doing packet captures (shed loads of DUP ACKs) If you sincerely want to be helped you need to answer some of the questions asked -- which questions you have chosen to avoid. Hi Mozerd, No av...
by hechz
Mon Jul 08, 2019 10:56 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

I ended having to swap the cisco device back in. Having tried every permutation of interfaces, MSS clamping, doing packet captures (shed loads of DUP ACKs)
by hechz
Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:12 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

Some questions: I will assume that your WAN connection is Fiber from Virgin Media -- so is the Cisco GigE SFP module white-listed [approved] by Virgin? Do you know the SYNC rate that Virgin is using ... is it 1.25G or 2,5G? From your description of the issue my assumption would point to the wrong t...
by hechz
Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:55 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

Re: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

have you tried it fresh, no ipv6, no tunnel, no extra firewall ? I did indeed, fresh out of the box configuration with only the masquerade rules, and I get the same speed. I decided to fall back from the SFP , tried a single interface (ether1), then tried a bond of two ports (9/10) and all get abou...
by hechz
Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:59 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN
Replies: 12
Views: 1092

RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD on 6.45.1 Extremely slow network throughput to WAN

Good day, I just started setting up my new RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD. I have a Cisco GigE SFP as the WAN port and ether1 as my primary LAN connection. I have setup some basic firewall rules, and my IPv6 tunnel but nothing else. Download speeds should be around 300 Mbps, but I getting much lower than I was...
by hechz
Thu Jul 20, 2017 12:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS109 vs RB3011 (the latest is the slower ?!?)
Replies: 4
Views: 1197

Re: CRS109 vs RB3011 (the latest is the slower ?!?)

Quick question on your addition of dst-address-type. Which NAT types did you apply this on? I would assume that DNAT for systems behind the firewall would require "dst-address-type=unicast" and not "dst-address-type=local", but perhaps I am misunderstanding the documentation.
by hechz
Fri Feb 17, 2017 12:35 am
Forum: General
Topic: Reboot and Factory reset on bad IPSEC configuration parameters.
Replies: 5
Views: 934

Re: Reboot and Factory reset on bad IPSEC configuration parameters.

Because the router fully rebooting back to factory default when you change the hashing algorithm on an IPSEC configuration seems to be a pretty unintended behaviour.
by hechz
Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Reboot and Factory reset on bad IPSEC configuration parameters.
Replies: 5
Views: 934

Re: Reboot and Factory reset on bad IPSEC configuration parameters.

That pretty strange as I have this up, and had it working, following the procedure at http://www.nasa-security.net/mikrotik/m ... ith-ipsec/, and it's been working away without issue.
by hechz
Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Reboot and Factory reset on bad IPSEC configuration parameters.
Replies: 5
Views: 934

Reboot and Factory reset on bad IPSEC configuration parameters.

Since early January, when running 6.37.3 or 6.38.1, I have had several issues with IPSEC, mostly L2TP Road-Warrior profiles. The issue I have been working on, is simultaneous configurations for Windows 10, iPhone, Android, and Linux clients. Whilst I muddled through various permutations of configura...
by hechz
Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:42 am
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP/IPSec behind NAT
Replies: 9
Views: 2438

Re: L2TP/IPSec behind NAT

I have to say, I am really disappointed that this issue is still not fully fixed. I've just tested that multi-device connectivity worked with one iPhone and One Android device connected, when I connected a second android device, the first was no longer able to pass traffic. Now, perhaps this is an ...
by hechz
Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:29 am
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP/IPSec behind NAT
Replies: 9
Views: 2438

Re: L2TP/IPSec behind NAT

I have to say, I am really disappointed that this issue is still not fully fixed. I've just tested that multi-device connectivity worked with one iPhone and One Android device connected, when I connected a second android device, the first was no longer able to pass traffic. Now, perhaps this is an A...
by hechz
Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:01 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.38rc [release candidate] is released
Replies: 331
Views: 78768

Re: v6.38rc [release candidate] is released

Hi All, I've just updated to rc35 and would like to report that the ipsec multi session behind a single NAT seems a bit buggy. While both sessions work for a few moments, as soon as traffic is passed, the session that connected first eventually becomes unuseable. I'm new to Mikrotik reporting, so if...
by hechz
Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Known issues and bugs - a list
Replies: 283
Views: 113123

Re: Known issues and bugs - a list

Issue: WiFI Throughput is reduced by 1/6th unless logged into webfig. Any thoughts on what could possibly cause this would be appreciated. RouterBoard Details: routerboard: yes model: 951Ui-2HnD serial-number: «redacted» current-firmware: 3.19 upgrade-firmware: 3.19 current-version: 6.25 latest-vers...