Community discussions

Search found 11 matches

by ruwi000
Sun Jul 28, 2019 6:33 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 206
Views: 35747

Re: v6.45.2 [stable] is released!

When I upgraded an LtAP mini (luckily a test machine) to 6.45.1, I lost the LTE interface! When I upgraded to 6.45.2, the LTE interface is back again.
There is nothing in the release/change notes. Anybody else experiencing the same issue?
by ruwi000
Tue Dec 18, 2018 2:44 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IPSec redundancy
Replies: 1
Views: 217

Re: IPSec redundancy

I think you can do something like this: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Advanced ... _Scripting
by ruwi000
Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: OOB management using LtAP
Replies: 0
Views: 201

OOB management using LtAP

I am configuring an LtAP as an out-of-band device to take over the console of something else. The idea is to have a VPN over LTE and hop back over this VPN to the serial port of the device. Everything works fine, but when I reboot the device with serial connected, it seems to hang. Because there is ...
by ruwi000
Mon Aug 27, 2018 12:56 pm
Forum: Scripting
Topic: DNS lookup TXT record
Replies: 1
Views: 990

Re: DNS lookup TXT record

I have the same issue that I can not find any way to do this.

It can be very handy for things like retrieving your "real" IP
nslookup -type=txt o-o.myaddr.l.google.com

:resolve only has options "server server-port domain-name"

If there are others? Maybe a feature request ?
by ruwi000
Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature][DNS] Allow 0.0.0.0 as address for DNS records
Replies: 6
Views: 2383

Re: [Feature][DNS] Allow 0.0.0.0 as address for DNS records

Just my 2 cents, if you do not want to use the classic private ranges ... There are also documentation ranges defined in rfc5737 192.0.2.0/24 (TEST-NET-1), 198.51.100.0/24 (TEST-NET-2) and 203.0.113.0/24 (TEST-NET-3) These are not allocated as global routable ranges. and should be black-holed any wa...
by ruwi000
Mon May 16, 2016 4:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: missing pings on high speed
Replies: 0
Views: 625

missing pings on high speed

I noticed that I get ping timeouts when pinging with "interval=10ms". It seems only the reporting can not keep up with the speed, as a packet trace showed no missing ping reply's. This was tested on ccr1009's. When you say you have to use flood-ping to do that - indeed flood ping misses no packets, ...
by ruwi000
Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problems using the VPN solutions to connect into a Windows domain
Replies: 0
Views: 532

Problems using the VPN solutions to connect into a Windows domain

After a lot of searching on the internet, I found the following (which can be useful to other users) (I think this can also be added to the wiki.) Windows 7, by default!, configures its VPN connections (L2TP, PPTP,) to use the credentials used to authenticate the VPN for all subsequent authenticatio...
by ruwi000
Mon Mar 07, 2016 6:22 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Management VLAN on bridged CCR
Replies: 9
Views: 3789

Re: Management VLAN on bridged CCR

Would something like this work? (the interfaces are just as example) you add the vlan interface to the bridge and put an IP on it. First create the bridge: /interface bridge add name=test /interface bridge port add bridge=test interface=ether1 add bridge=test interface=ether2 Then add the vlan to th...
by ruwi000
Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:22 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: SOS - Layer 7
Replies: 1
Views: 444

Re: SOS - Layer 7

on which platform are you testing?
I noticed issues with L7 on CHR. Other platforms work fine.
by ruwi000
Fri Mar 04, 2016 1:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CCR1009 dropping or unordering UDP packets with high load
Replies: 4
Views: 561

Re: CCR1009 dropping or unordering UDP packets with high load

Have you tried putting the stream in a queue, (one of the fifo queues) and then tune the queue size ...
I think the multi processor setup of the ccr1009 can cause the reordering, a queue could fix this.
by ruwi000
Fri Mar 04, 2016 1:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: SSTP over IPv6
Replies: 0
Views: 386

SSTP over IPv6

While setting up SSTP I have a problem getting it to work over IPv6. In the WiKi it is stated that http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IPv6_Overview MikroTik IPv6 support at the moment: ... all PPP (Point-to-point protocols); What is the meaning of this? That IPv6 is supported as transport protocol...