Community discussions

Search found 135 matches

by bokili
Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:17 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Linking two 5GHz cards on one track with dual pol. anntena
Replies: 14
Views: 2885

Re:

isolation of cards could help you.
Janisk,

Can you precize what you mean by this?
by bokili
Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:03 am
Forum: General
Topic: PPPoE server performance and packet lose problems
Replies: 100
Views: 23325

Re: PPPoE server performance and packet lose problems

3.7 beta works fine, as we can see for this short period of time: Packets: Sent = 4546, Received = 4546, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 478ms, Average = 8ms Before this I had 2%-5% loss on 200 packets. This is great news! Why do you have ...
by bokili
Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: EOIP over EOIP
Replies: 2
Views: 670

Re: EOIP over EOIP

Hi,

I have 1 EoIP with 4 RB333 and 1 more with 2 RB600 and working with no problems.

RB600 bonding 2 EoIP links and going to another RB600. RB600s connected with other EoIP. Only one EoIP between 2 same routerOS.


Martín.
Do you have EOIP tunnel within EOIP tunnel?
by bokili
Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: EOIP over EOIP
Replies: 2
Views: 670

EOIP over EOIP

Is it possible to have EOIP tunnel over EOIP tunnel without issues?

Anybody tried this?
by bokili
Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:07 pm
Forum: General
Topic: PPPoE server performance and packet lose problems
Replies: 100
Views: 23325

Re: PPPoE server performance and packet lose problems

Use static queues to solve this problem is impossible. Queues are created dynamically by radius attribute.
It will not help to resolve problem. We already tried.
by bokili
Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:40 am
Forum: General
Topic: PPPoE server performance and packet lose problems
Replies: 100
Views: 23325

Re: PPPoE server performance and packet lose problems

When I write about this nobody responded :) Even some of you write that we (my company) do not know to use mikrotik and other bullshits... So:)? What now:) Who has the right about packet loss in v3.X ??? :) The problem is really in MT. From my experience I can tell you that there is not packet loss ...
by bokili
Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v4.0 Feature Request(s)
Replies: 139
Views: 38691

Re: v4.0 Feature Request(s)

do you want v3 to ever be stable? ;)
I want this desperately!!!! :shock:
by bokili
Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:39 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution
Replies: 42
Views: 7788

Re: Is it possible with MikoTik - guruz free to feel chalanged ;

I just make bandwidth test, But was unable to achieve better than 50Mbit/sec Full Duplex with real traffic already passing... Something heppend with aligment of antennas I suppose... I will check it. yeah, it's real... that is smt. real. at 50km we have usually 55-60Mbps bandwidth test and 45Mbps r...
by bokili
Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:46 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution
Replies: 42
Views: 7788

Re: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution

Are you sure you have exactly such results? Not kidding us? I just make bandwidth test, But was unable to achieve better than 50Mbit/sec Full Duplex with real traffic already passing... Something heppend with aligment of antennas I suppose... I will check it. See attached file. mikrotik-dual-nstrem...
by bokili
Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:30 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution
Replies: 42
Views: 7788

Re: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution

I just finished putting up a 14 mile link with 2' Dish Antenna's & RB600's each with a single XR5 card (no nstreme dual). Max throughput is around 30mbit tcp one way. I think you will find it very hard to get 40mbit full duplex out of the 333's. You should be able to achieve at least 27mbit full du...
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:58 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Re: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

Just tested bandwidth between RB411 running v3.2 connected to 2.9.X base station, on two different setups.. Bandwidth test from bs shows: Send 14M, Receive 2M, Both 6M/600k.. Which is similiar as on x86 system... (But on x86 things fixed, I do not how after upgrading from 2.9.51 to v3.4...) Then upg...
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:59 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Re: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

We just finished few tests and this is very strange and confusing, I will repeat once again how we test it and what is the results: Yesterday we setup ptmp link between 2.9.50 and v3.4.. Distance is over 5km. Signal is -54 Link is established without a problem, but the problem occurs to be bandwidth...
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:44 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Re: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

OK.. Please check it.. We just try it, and there is a problem.. Downgrading one side to 2.9.51 solved problem... Our test link is ptmp without nstreme...
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:38 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Re: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

Gerard,

Read carefully my post.. There is no problem of connecting but of BANDWIDTH.
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:22 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Re: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

Normis,

We are experimenting since morning today, I will post results later.
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:31 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Re: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

MT has recommended that you run all clients and base stations that connect on the same version. This means everything on 2.9 or 3.x, but not to mix and match.
This can be real pain in the ass... Is there v3 rcX which is compatible with 2.9.X ??
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:34 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution
Replies: 42
Views: 7788

Re: with money as no object, I need a real MT backhaul solution

You must become an expert with mikrotik to have good results..

We have several links over 80km with dual nstreme with bandwidth 60-64M/60-64M
on all installations.. We use 2.9.50 versions for this purpose...

All works perfect... You must use x86 systems to achieve better results...
by bokili
Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:22 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?
Replies: 23
Views: 3311

Incompatibility between 2.9.50 and v3.4 wireless?

Is there incompatibility problems and issues between versions 2.9.50 and v3.4?? Our problem: Base station run version 2.9.50 level 6 and we want to connect other base station to this one which run version v3.4 level 4 with wds using ap bridge on the 2.9.50 and bridge on v3.4. It connects without a p...
by bokili
Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Simultaneous-use is a Problem or a Bug For MikroTik?
Replies: 3
Views: 2296

Re: Simultaneous-use is a Problem or a Bug For MikroTik?

It works in Radius Manager without a problem with mt 2.9.51, so I suppose that this is not problem in mikrotik.
by bokili
Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:07 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik 3.4 Installation Bug
Replies: 0
Views: 451

Mikrotik 3.4 Installation Bug

When I installed Mikrotik 3.4 on CF card it gave me error: Warning: file /lib/libexpat.so.1 collide with system packages, but it boots without a problem.
by bokili
Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet BUG in 3.4
Replies: 1
Views: 963

RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet BUG in 3.4

Mikrotik 3.4 recognises RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller on Asus motherboard, it shows ether card in interfaces, but it doesn't work. Card also shows "Link OK" even if cable is not plugged in.
by bokili
Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:03 am
Forum: General
Topic: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X
Replies: 7
Views: 1171

Re: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X

Letni, Thank you for your info, we will consider to test it, if we find this motherboard in our country. gmsmstr, I checked your offer, you made excellent hardware combinations! But, unfortunatelly we cannot use v3 for this particular purpose. If we can, our problem will be solved immediatelly, we c...
by bokili
Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:12 pm
Forum: General
Topic: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X
Replies: 7
Views: 1171

Re: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X

nowires, thank you very much for your post. I read few reviews of this processor and find out that this processor is comparable to Intel Celeron processor and not to full Intel Pentium 4. We are using full pentium 4 processor which is more powerfull than Athlon LE-1640 .. Thank you for your suggesti...
by bokili
Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request: Ignore DEAUTHs
Replies: 2
Views: 1315

Re: Feature Request: Ignore DEAUTHs

Yes, I agree.. Sometimes DEAUTHs are big problem.
by bokili
Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X
Replies: 7
Views: 1171

Re: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X

I suppose that you know why I am asking this question. I am using v3.X for some purposes, but for one "special" purpose (and you know what is it) I need to use v2.9.51 with as powerfull hardware as possible. If somebody used v2.9.X on more powerfull hardware than Intel Pentium 4 3GHZ 1MB cache and s...
by bokili
Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:40 am
Forum: General
Topic: The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X
Replies: 7
Views: 1171

The Most powerfull hardware you tried with Mikrotik v2.9.X

We need powerfull hardware which can work with v2.9.51 stable.

Can you list your Xeon, Intel Desktop CPU, AMD CPU configurations with exact name of motherboard and nic, which works stable with v2.9.X and have newer hardware than Pentium 4 with CPU of 1M cache memory?
by bokili
Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:34 am
Forum: General
Topic: Limit PPPoE User by Time and Bandwidth Base
Replies: 3
Views: 939

Re: Limit PPPoE User by Time and Bandwidth Base

Yes, Radius Manager allows that.
by bokili
Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:03 am
Forum: General
Topic: Planet ENW-9700 PCI Express NIC
Replies: 2
Views: 867

Re: Planet ENW-9700 PCI Express NIC

Yes it works...

It works also on 2.9.48
by bokili
Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:33 am
Forum: General
Topic: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...
Replies: 35
Views: 10830

Re: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...

I recommend to use MRRU (PPP Multilink protocol) option and forget about Change-mms rules at all
Why you think that this is better?
by bokili
Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Replace Cisco with 4 serial connections [SOLVED]
Replies: 9
Views: 1452

Re: Replace Cisco with 4 serial connections


Being there, done that!
I supposed you'll recommend me a real load-balancer hardware next? :D
I've seen a few of your previous posts ;)
But what is your problem then?
I don't want to mark packets or anything that will cause the troubles as I have seen on other posts.
What problems?
by bokili
Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Replace Cisco with 4 serial connections [SOLVED]
Replies: 9
Views: 1452

Re: Replace Cisco with 4 serial connections

The question is what you want to achieve?

Mikrotik can do almost everything except few things which is more CISCO specific.
by bokili
Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB411 upgrade or downgrade
Replies: 3
Views: 2330

Re: RB411 upgrade or downgrade

1. Make sure you uploaded correct package. For RB400 routeros-mipsbe package should be used. Log should also have some entries about what went wrong during installation. 2. 411 is using new atheros cpu which is big endian, so 2.9 won't work on this board. Thank you. Our administrator used mipsle an...
by bokili
Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:06 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB411 upgrade or downgrade
Replies: 3
Views: 2330

RB411 upgrade or downgrade

We buy large quantity of RB411 and have few questions if somebody can help us: 1. Can this be upgraded to v3.2 and how as it came with version v3.0 rc12 ? We downloaded npk package for 3.2 version and it won't upgrade after reboot. Is there a different way for upgrading than in v2? 2. Can this RB411...
by bokili
Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:14 am
Forum: General
Topic: Need help with spammers/viruses
Replies: 14
Views: 9552

Re: Need help with spammers/viruses

If you use this method in v3 you will encounter problems, as it will block users which doesn't spam randomly. There is something buggy in v3 with this rules. In our case problem started few days after we upgraded to v3 where we had also this method of indentification of spammers or infected users. H...
by bokili
Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:17 am
Forum: General
Topic: CNet CWP-854 Adapter Problem
Replies: 12
Views: 1874

Re: CNet CWP-854 Adapter Problem

It is not possible to install it like in any other OS.
by bokili
Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 3.0
Replies: 70
Views: 13117

Re: RouterOS 3.0

We ship PoweRouters with dual-core P4s and so far had no issues that I know of with using multi-cpu .
There's no such thing as dual-core pentium 4. It's Pentium D.

Yes, I emphaze semantics.
Yes there is: http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/displa ... 51158.html
by bokili
Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: trouble with MT
Replies: 3
Views: 751

Re: trouble with MT

Yes, use another Ethernet Card.
by bokili
Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:46 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CNet CWP-854 Adapter Problem
Replies: 12
Views: 1874

Re: CNet CWP-854 Adapter Problem

If you don't see it, you cannot use it. It's simple:)
by bokili
Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:03 pm
Forum: General
Topic: PCI-E interfaces which works on Mikrotik
Replies: 0
Views: 500

PCI-E interfaces which works on Mikrotik

Can somebody list PCI-E interfaces (especially Ethernet cards) which works on Mikrotik???
by bokili
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: WinBox background suggestion
Replies: 15
Views: 5084

Re: WinBox background suggestion

Very Good proposal.
by bokili
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v4.0 Feature Request(s)
Replies: 139
Views: 38691

Re: v4.0 Feature Request(s)

100% new version of NStream (NOT backwards compatable) to include advanced polling, full QOS, reduced latency, dynamic frequency selection WITHOUT disconnecting active clients, automaticly adjusting framing policy (that does not affect QOS) New version of NStream Dual with automatic fall back to ha...
by bokili
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RealTek RTL81139/810x Family Fast Etherenet driver for MOS
Replies: 8
Views: 3519

Re: RealTek RTL81139/810x Family Fast Etherenet driver for MOS

RouterOS v3 should detect it
I noticed that V3 can detected new cards, but some of them are just detected and doesn't work, there is no traffic and it show: no link.
I Paid for license how can I upgrade on version 3 without losing the license..
Why you think that you will lose license ?
by bokili
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:07 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Winbox: Chip Info
Replies: 2
Views: 1363

Re: Winbox: Chip Info

This field on Wireless / Interfaces / General does not show full information about interface. Only the first line is visible and scroll buttons are disabled.
Which version of MT ?
by bokili
Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:51 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...
Replies: 35
Views: 10830

Re: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...

about 30-35 meg total.. All routed, public IPs, 3500 or so OSPF Routes. PoweRouter 732 with only one core on, v.3. Change TCP MSS was off. This explain it. But there is a lot of issues by not using Change TCP MSS. So, we cannot turn that option off. Probably our problem with packet loss in V3 lies ...
by bokili
Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...
Replies: 35
Views: 10830

Re: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...

v3 at the time. 2600 tunnels at once.
What is the bandwidth? How you test ping ?

What is the hardware configuration ? Do you have enabled CHANGE MSS in profiles?

Do you NAT your internet or have public IP's? How many?
by bokili
Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:31 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: bridge in v3 not working like before
Replies: 3
Views: 846

Re: bridge in v3 not working like before

Hi, i have 2 RBs, in both RBs here is what i did created bridge1, then added eth1 & wlan1 to the bridge ports, on previous versions, i was able to ping the IP of the other RB from winbos, after upgrading to version 3, i get request time out. has anything changed in version 3 in regard of bridging p...
by bokili
Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:26 am
Forum: General
Topic: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...
Replies: 35
Views: 10830

Re: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...

We pinged a good number of customers from remote off-net IPs and never lost more than a single packet. The loss was well under 1%. Nothing like what was reported of 15+% ..
Which RouterOS version you are running? How many pppoe tunnels you had active at the time you test ping ?
by bokili
Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:30 am
Forum: General
Topic: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...
Replies: 35
Views: 10830

Re: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...

Well... We completed testing last night with PPPoE load. Using the steps listed above we moved over the traffic to 600+ users with CPU running an average of 20-23% utilization. We then moved over a big site (1000+ PPPoE session). The CPU was running good at 33% utilization, memory 90% free, .... 20...
by bokili
Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:19 am
Forum: General
Topic: 10GbE PCI-E Adapter Options
Replies: 1
Views: 835

Re: 10GbE PCI-E Adapter Options

We are interested also, if this can work under Mikrotik.
by bokili
Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:23 am
Forum: General
Topic: 2.9.51 - When ?
Replies: 3
Views: 783

Re: 2.9.51 - When ?

core duo are not going to be in the 2.9.xx series it is a kernel thing :( No, it is a kernel thing when you talking about having benefits of 2 cores, where you can enable second one in v3. We do not need this in 2.9.X. In 2.9.X you have other problem when using motherboards which supports Core2Duo:...
by bokili
Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 2.9.51 - When ?
Replies: 3
Views: 783

Re: 2.9.51 - When ?

I also want to see 2.9.51 where you can use new motherboards with Intel Core2Duo: Intel 865 new (which supports Core2Duo) to Intel 945 Chipset... As at this time we cannot use new v3 for pppoe because of the problem with packet loss. Se we must find older motherboards which works fine with 2.9.X, an...
by bokili
Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BGP and OSPF
Replies: 14
Views: 2003

Re: BGP and OSPF

You probably done something wrong.

I am sure mikrotik BGP works perfect in V3 final.
by bokili
Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:21 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BGP and OSPF
Replies: 14
Views: 2003

Re: BGP and OSPF

BGP is very stable on v3 final.

Well done mikrotik.
by bokili
Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:31 am
Forum: General
Topic: RealTek RTL81139/810x Family Fast Etherenet driver for MOS
Replies: 8
Views: 3519

Re: RealTek RTL81139/810x Family Fast Etherenet driver for MOS

What version of RouterOS you are running?
by bokili
Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:17 am
Forum: General
Topic: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...
Replies: 35
Views: 10830

Re: Complete PPPoE Router Failure -- Looking for ideas...

There was also some talk about removing the change TCP MSS value as it creates lots of rules etc. This is not a solution. You will have a lot of problems by turning this off: Cannot open some websites, MSN messenger doesn't working etc. Under a not so heavy load (<200 users) even with multi-cpu tur...
by bokili
Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: PPPoE + queuing bug?
Replies: 20
Views: 4225

Re: PPPoE + queuing bug?

I didn't notice that in V3 probably because we didn't run it more than 3 days because of the problem with Packet Loss when having more than 150 concurrent pppoe tunnels so we downgraded to v2.9.X.. But problem with unlimited queues remains. I have not heard of that problem. Running v3.0 for last 5 ...
by bokili
Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:52 am
Forum: General
Topic: Help to make an ISP with MT
Replies: 8
Views: 1459

Re: Help to make an ISP with MT

You can hire a lot of administrators which knows how that works. This is not solution which you can write in few sentences.

Here on forum you can find them : )
by bokili
Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:48 am
Forum: General
Topic: PPPoE + queuing bug?
Replies: 20
Views: 4225

Re: PPPoE + queuing bug?

We have the same problem long time. The problem is in 2.9.X versions, I notice in all versions we used: from 2.9.1 to 2.9.50. Every 20-30 Days of uptime, at some point, all users starts to have unlimited bandwidth when they connect from that moment on. This is not the problem of RADIUS as it works a...
by bokili
Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:58 am
Forum: General
Topic: BGP and OSPF
Replies: 14
Views: 2003

Re: BGP and OSPF

The problem was intel 945 chipset not supported in 2.9.X fully...

Upgrading to v3 fixed problem.
by bokili
Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:57 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 802.11N
Replies: 13
Views: 3595

Re: 802.11N

all new features are for v3 only. this is what makes 2.9 stable. if we start adding stuff to it, it will be exactly the same as a beta.
Still no 802.11N support in v3 ??????
by bokili
Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 Packet Loss with more PPPoE concurent connections

It is not the pppoe - it is simple queue for each user, thats where the problem is. go to the "queue type" and increase size of the queue - it should solve the problem. By default it is default-small queue with only 10 packages allowed in the queue (packet 11 will be dropped). Go to the /queue type...
by bokili
Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections

3.0 final, approx. ~270 pppoe clients, packet loss is here: Ping statistics for 194.87.0.50: Packets: Sent = 500, Received = 408, Lost = 92 (18% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 17ms Welcome to the Club of PPPoE Packet Loss :) I ask ever...
by bokili
Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:47 am
Forum: General
Topic: v3.0 big BUG BUG BUG
Replies: 23
Views: 6432

Re: v3.0 big BUG BUG BUG

Maybe the problem is driver if it is changed in v3.
by bokili
Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections

I have more than 200 pppoe clients and haven't noticed any packet loss . Are there any packet loss for real traffic? Probably your pingtool is calculating something wrong. This is the same answer I got from mikrotik support. You didn't notice as you didn't watched for it :) It can be a real pain in...
by bokili
Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 Packet Loss with more PPPoE concurent connections

I confirm that there is the same problem with packet loss in v3 final when having 150+ pppoe tunnels. This is not solved. We will downgrade to 2.9.50 If somebody is interested we can post image from ping tool as proof in v3 final where you can see packet loss, and image when running 2.9.X without pa...
by bokili
Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 3.0
Replies: 70
Views: 13117

Re: RouterOS 3.0

I just want to say 3.0 is not ready. more problem in 3.0
I disagree, It is excellent "piece of software". MT Stuff just need to fix Packet Loss which occuring when having 160+ pppoe tunnels.
by bokili
Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 Packet Loss with more PPPoE concurent connections

It is not the pppoe - it is simple queue for each user, thats where the problem is. go to the "queue type" and increase size of the queue - it should solve the problem. What value you recommend? But there is the same values like in 2.9.x and in v3 there is about 2-5% packet loss when running 200+ u...
by bokili
Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:10 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 Packet Loss with more PPPoE concurent connections

Is this solved in RC14? Does somebody tested RC14 for packet loss when having more than 150+ pppoe tunnels?
by bokili
Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:57 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 very stable for BGP
Replies: 0
Views: 1015

RC13 very stable for BGP

After testing rc13 with full internet routes our conclusion is that RC13 is very stable...

No bugs noticed for this purpose of Mikrotik RC13...

It working perfect, currently uptime is 10 days... Traffic load is very high and no errors detected. Cpu load is around 10% on x86 system.
by bokili
Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:53 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)
Replies: 24
Views: 4497

Re: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)

We didn't have this kind of problems with high load setups: 600+ pppoe Just problem with packet loss for traffic going through this pppoe router. With 600+ simple queues it is not surprising - and I can bet that guys with the last queues have bigger problems. There are two solutions : Change the qu...
by bokili
Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 2.9.50 bug for Radius
Replies: 1
Views: 482

Re: 2.9.50 bug for Radius

I suppose that this have something with *) updated timezone information;
in 2.9.48 version, as of this version to 2.9.50 problem is the same, mt pppoe server disconects radius users 1 hour before...

Anybody to discuss?
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 2.9.50 bug for Radius
Replies: 1
Views: 482

2.9.50 bug for Radius

If user connects through pppoe to 2.9.50 pppoe server, where authentication will be made through radius and radius set up time limit, this user will be disconected 1 hour before, example: If user connect in monday and it's account is valid until saturday, mt pppoe server will disconect this user in ...
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)
Replies: 24
Views: 4497

Re: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)

We didn't have this kind of problems with high load setups: 600+ pppoe

Just problem with packet loss for traffic going through this pppoe router.
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

Re: RC 13 Bug

Hi, i run nstreme dual on RC13. I run it stable, after hours of testing i found : dont use any extended features - compression , csma, wmm - all has to be disabled, then the link is stable. When i enabled one of this, the pings are dropped, when enable csma off the link will disconnect itself after...
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)
Replies: 24
Views: 4497

Re: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)

Do you maybe have integrated motherboard lan card enabled on this pppoe machine which mikrotik 2.9.x doesn't see?
Yes, MT ROS 2.9.x does not recognize the onboard lan adapter on that GZIS motherboard, but ROS 3.0 do.
If you using 2.9.x try disabling and see what will heppends with stability...
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: MK Crash'es
Replies: 11
Views: 1740

Re: MK Crash'es

Stick with intel motherboards if you want mikrotik stability.
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:55 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

Re: RC 13 Bug

hi i have compact flash (Level 6) with router OS 2.9.44 when i upgrade my system to 3rc13 i have problem with 1. Unstable signal strength 2. regular packet loss. and anybody tell me Copact flash working in Dual core processor or not? so if any one have the solution plz help me. thanx in advance. ja...
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:50 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)
Replies: 24
Views: 4497

Re: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)

Ozelo,

Do you maybe have integrated motherboard lan card enabled on this pppoe machine which mikrotik 2.9.x doesn't see?
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:45 am
Forum: General
Topic: BGP Problems Still Exist in RC13
Replies: 3
Views: 1545

Re: BGP Problems Still Exist in RC13

BGP reset again. So, the L7 rules did nothing.
What is the period in days when your bgp router restarts or lock out?
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:43 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS RC13 stop working
Replies: 23
Views: 3889

Re: RouterOS RC13 stop working

Hello!! Happy New Year!!!! Sorry I don't understand you, when you said: Use maximum RAM of 512MB Now I have 1 Gb of RAM, so you say that I have to extrat a module and have only 512? I have to manange like about 170 client!! Thank you Rafael Lore We encountered weird problems with using more than 51...
by bokili
Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:40 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS RC13 stop working
Replies: 23
Views: 3889

Re: RouterOS RC13 stop working

I can confirm that rc13 have packet loss problem when having more than 200+ pppoe connections... But so far I didn't notice problem with lock out... I can confirm that 2.9.x lockout on intel 945 when realtek lan is enabled which mikrotik doesn't see.. Rc13 works excellent on intel 945 .. So far we n...
by bokili
Sat Dec 29, 2007 6:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS RC13 stop working
Replies: 23
Views: 3889

Re: RouterOS RC13 stop working

Hello
First of all I use with multiprocessor support turned off and the processor was at 100% the I activated and down to 40 %
Thank
Rafael Lore
Use maximum RAM of 512MB or downgrade to 2.9.X
That is solution for you.
by bokili
Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:57 am
Forum: General
Topic: BGP and OSPF
Replies: 14
Views: 2003

Re: BGP and OSPF

"Ste", Possible that we had problem as we used 2GB Ram which 2.9.X doesn't support and maximum working period was 3 days. We will test it soon with 512MB. I asked support and they told that more than 1GB will not be a problem as mikrotik "will use only what is needed" but you never know. "Gerard" TH...
by bokili
Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)
Replies: 24
Views: 4497

Re: ROS/x86 3.0rc13 bugs (winbox, pppoe server)

We had the same problem. Under 300+ - 600+ PPPoE Tunnels v3 rc 13 is very unstable with a lot of packet loss, even CPU Load is around 50-70%

Downgrading to 2.9.X fixed problem : )
by bokili
Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BGP and OSPF
Replies: 14
Views: 2003

Re: BGP and OSPF

I've a 2.9.45 system running BGP/OSPF for 132 days now without a single problem. BGP Sessions are 52days up. I think that success is in 2.9.45 as we tested it with 2.9.50 and it keep crashing as it use all RAM memory available for 3 days and after every 3 days and few hours it crashes, so we are us...
by bokili
Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

Re: RC 13 Bug

Maybe, that is the reason.
by bokili
Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:00 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 Packet Loss with more PPPoE concurent connections

After my first post in this thread we done more testing. So, conclusion: It must be problem of bad optimization for Intel CPU's. Even if CPU load is not 100%, sometimes 100% appears for flash of a second which is not the case in 2.9.49 We disabled some stuff, such as connection tracking, mangle mark...
by bokili
Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:49 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

Re: RC 13 Bug

we are running nstream-dual with rc13 on rb333.

After a long period of fine tuning af the link we are very stable now.

What paltform are you running rb532a or x86?
X86
by bokili
Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:43 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

Re: RC13 Packet Loss with more PPPoE concurent connections

You use Masquerade/NAT 1:1 or Connection tracking ?
No NAT/masquerade.

Of course that we use connection tracking... as in 2.9.49 version...
by bokili
Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:30 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections
Replies: 13
Views: 2787

RC13 & v3 final Packet Loss with 150+ PPPoE connections

We tested v3 RC13 and it has big problem when running 300+ PPPoE connections at the same time. CPU load is very higher than in 2.9.49, around 80%, when in 2.9.49 is about 50% on the same hardware. Packet Loss through tcp/ip connections is non stop, measured with tool smokeping: 1.80% average and 9.0...
by bokili
Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:38 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 3.0 and 100% CPU issue
Replies: 25
Views: 6053

Re: ROS 3.0 and 100% CPU issue

Do you maybe have ethernet interface which not connected? No Link on it ?
by bokili
Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:31 am
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

Re: RC 13 Bug

After few hours of testing two dual nstreme links on RC13, we have this results: 1. Link is very unstable 2. Packet loss is regular 3. Link just stop responding for few seconds and sometime for minute very regular 4. Bandwith is good when it works Solution for this: You must login into winbox and pi...
by bokili
Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:21 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

Re: RC 13 Bug

1. Did you used latest winbox loader version 2.2.13.? 2. Did you cleared the Winbox cache before using? 3. Did you used Mac or IP mode? 1.YES 2. YES, we tried that also 3. IP Mode... It was License level 5 Also, we just upgraded another machine which doesn't have dual nstreme links but have just 4 ...
by bokili
Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:50 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC 13 Bug
Replies: 13
Views: 2672

RC 13 Bug

Today we upgraded from 2.9.50 to RC13 to test dual nstreme. Results is that Dual Nstreme works better in RC13... However there is a problem with winbox. When we accessed for the first times to our Intel X86 Machines just upgraded to RC13 there was problem with winbox. It just wasn't work: I entered ...
by bokili
Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RC13 wierd Nstreme2 performance
Replies: 6
Views: 1899

Re: RC13 wierd Nstreme2 performance

RC13 works much better with dual nstreme than 2.9.50

We tested it today on the same range and with the same equipment.
by bokili
Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:45 pm
Forum: General
Topic: BGP on Mikrotik
Replies: 3
Views: 1175

Re: BGP on Mikrotik

Leaving out some hickups that appear know and then.. it works OK. Not as good as quagga or cisco IOS but its OKish.

We have been using it in our community for almost 2 years know. :)
Do you use it for public IP ranges?
Is it stable?

Anybody who can comment if use BGP for public IPs ?
by bokili
Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:31 pm
Forum: Scripting
Topic: Reboot Server if BGP Routes Lost for More than 5 Minutes
Replies: 15
Views: 2608

Re: Reboot Server if BGP Routes Lost for More than 5 Minutes

Can somebody of you, send packages for 2.9.45 or 2.9.46 ?
by bokili
Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:27 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: secure nstreme2
Replies: 1
Views: 679

Re: secure nstreme2

IS it possible to encrypt data send thru cards in nstreme dual slave mode?
It seems the security setting is ignored.
I could put some vpn encryption maybe, but that would require more cpu power
You don't need to do this :)
Your data will be safe :)
by bokili
Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Dial up interfaces
Replies: 3
Views: 743

Re: Dial up interfaces

Does mikrotik support any dial-up interfaces either to allow others to dial in or to allow mikrotik to dial out?
it is important with which interfaces?

Mikrotik is not compatible with Cisco Vpdn for dial up through LAC and LNS with l2tp tunneling..
by bokili
Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: PCI-Express Gigabit LAN
Replies: 0
Views: 442

PCI-Express Gigabit LAN

Can somebody suggest what is the best GIGABIT PCI-E card to use with mikrotik? If somebody have experience with PCI-E working stable on MT V2.9.50 please post your findings. Of course I refer to PCI-E 1x :) If it is possible, it will be good it somebody from Mikrotik can tell if this card: http://ww...
by bokili
Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: INTEL Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
Replies: 6
Views: 1685

Re: INTEL Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad

V3.X uses "Multi CPU" kernal.. V2.X uses single CPU kernal.. Ok.. Than we just need to wait stable release of v3.x As well this lan card concerns, the problem is driver... I hope it will be included in the next versions.. What do you think: There should not be a problem if you use Core 2 Quad with ...
by bokili
Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:27 am
Forum: General
Topic: INTEL Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad
Replies: 6
Views: 1685

INTEL Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad

Is it possible to use latest version of MT with this processors?

If it is possible, will MT use all benefits of this multi-core CPUs?

Also, is it possible to use MT with latest Realtek chipsets for example: Realtek 8110SC Gigabit Ethernet controller ?
by bokili
Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:25 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 802.11N
Replies: 13
Views: 3595

Re: 802.11N

I do not agree with you.. You have antennas with dual polarisation so you can use 3 antennas instead of 6...
by bokili
Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:18 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 802.11N
Replies: 13
Views: 3595

Re: 802.11N

This is the Great News!

Can I take this opportunity to ask you about wimax technology, do you work to support it, maybe, or you wait atheros to release minipci card based on this technology?

Also, will dual nstreme be possible with two 802.11N minipci cards ?
by bokili
Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:26 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 802.11N
Replies: 13
Views: 3595

802.11N

Is it possible to use this card: http://www.unex.com.tw/product/dnma-81
based on atheros 802.11N with mikrotik 2.9.49...?

I know that linux drivers are available but linux don't have NSTREME, especially dual :) :)
by bokili
Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:55 am
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug
Replies: 7
Views: 1162

Re: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug

Sergeys, Thank you for your response.. No, I do not have any script. Ozelo, my problem also started when we achieve high number of pppoe connections at the same time. Yes, I had that problem also when queue for download or upload doesn't work. I do not think that the problem is hardware because I di...
by bokili
Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:28 am
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug
Replies: 7
Views: 1162

Re: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug

It heppends again before 5 minutes after 15 days uptime.

I forget to make suppout file. I will do it next time..
by bokili
Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:48 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug
Replies: 7
Views: 1162

Re: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug

:) Okay.. I am telling that it is the bug and I didn't tell that it doesn't work all the time.. So, it doesn't work correctly after random period of time.. everything is setup correctly. No particular reason for such strange behavior of mt. Queue for pppoe users just doesn't work after 20-30 days.. ...
by bokili
Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:35 am
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik PPPoE Bug
Replies: 7
Views: 1162

Mikrotik PPPoE Bug

I didn't try this on 2.9.45 but I suppose it will be the same as I didn't find it in new fixes that you fix this problem. So the problem: In our network every PPPoE or PPPtP user have it's own speed (queue) it can be: 256/256k 512/512k, 1024/1024k etc negotiated through radius :). But, after 20-30 d...
by bokili
Fri Jun 29, 2007 1:37 am
Forum: General
Topic: Vote for new RouterOS features!
Replies: 48
Views: 12236

Re: Vote for new RouterOS features!

Again, Can you add VPDN Functions on voting: 1. L2TP Tunnel Authentication 2. LAC and LNS Functions 3. Multiple (id) sessions through one l2tp tunnel 4. Accepting multiple connections through one LAC (To make possible multiple (without limit) l2tp connections from the same LAC) 5. Include multilink ...
by bokili
Tue May 29, 2007 10:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Vote for new RouterOS features!
Replies: 9
Views: 2394

Re: Vote for new RouterOS features!

Can you add voting for support of VPDN tunnels and sessions, especially through l2tp???
by bokili
Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:52 am
Forum: General
Topic: Problem: Mikrotik and L2TP Tunnel Authentication
Replies: 7
Views: 2584

Yes, mikrotik doesn't see different id tunnel connections. So, if you have one vpdn connection from one LAC, and receive another from the same LAC (with different tunnel id or with the same tunnel id), mikrotik disconects previous connection. So, this is main trouble if you shut down l2tp tunnel aut...
by bokili
Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problem: Mikrotik and L2TP Tunnel Authentication
Replies: 7
Views: 2584

Somebody to discuss ?
by bokili
Thu Mar 08, 2007 3:10 am
Forum: General
Topic: Problem: Mikrotik and L2TP Tunnel Authentication
Replies: 7
Views: 2584

Yes, you are... VPDN Cisco tehnology need that you have L2TP Tunnel Authentication on your LNS. So if you have mikrotik as router and LNS and at the other side you have CISCO (unfortunately in my case other side is CISCO) this is impossible to set as mikrotik doesn't support it. More info you can fi...
by bokili
Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:24 am
Forum: General
Topic: Problem: Mikrotik and L2TP Tunnel Authentication
Replies: 7
Views: 2584

If somebody from mikrotik can discuss this implementation, it will be excellent.

Somebody ?
by bokili
Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Problem: Mikrotik and L2TP Tunnel Authentication
Replies: 7
Views: 2584

Problem: Mikrotik and L2TP Tunnel Authentication

It seems that mikrotik doesn't support this right now. As we are unable to setup mikrotik as LNS because we have just one problem: That is how to setup l2tp tunnel authentication. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080455adf.html#wp1025043 We want t...
by bokili
Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:47 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Extended frequency reqiured for 2.7-2.9 Ghz
Replies: 39
Views: 6870

OOh!

Please tell us, which one is this card which support channels to 40GHZ???? :)
by bokili
Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:10 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Dual Nstreme - Strange Behavior
Replies: 7
Views: 1443

It's separated more than 200mhz each...

You will not believe it..

Today it works, like before..

Let's see what will be tomorrow...
by bokili
Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Dual Nstreme - Strange Behavior
Replies: 7
Views: 1443

Yes, yes.. single nstreme works fine on both frequencies.

No, rebooting doesn't fix problem here..
by bokili
Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:30 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Dual Nstreme - Strange Behavior
Replies: 7
Views: 1443

Uldis, What you mean exactly, I posted hardware setup. And Nstreme2 setup also. Do you mean which freq or ? Or this: interface wireless nstreme-dual> print Flags: X - disabled, R - running 0 R name="nstreme1" mtu=1500 mac-address=00:15:6D:50:05:4A arp=enabled disable-running-check=no tx-radio=wlan1 ...
by bokili
Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:48 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Mass Upgrading
Replies: 21
Views: 4120

YappaDappa,

What distance and what ping times you get with motorola canopy ?
by bokili
Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:43 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Dual Nstreme - Strange Behavior
Replies: 7
Views: 1443

Dual Nstreme - Strange Behavior

First I setup 2 independent nstreme links, before I start with NSTREME2. P4 on each end, 5 SR5 cards in every P4. I choose 2 cards on each end, connect them with 29dBi Grid Antennas.. Signal with every Tryout (SR5 to SR5 with 29dBi, over 65Km distance) is about -68 to -75 on both antennas and links....
by bokili
Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:06 am
Forum: General
Topic: atheros AR5008X wifi n
Replies: 30
Views: 8198

Yes, single NSTREME is excellent choice for long range distance links as when you only care for BANDWIDTH. But if you care for latency, there is a big problem: When you put through real internet traffic, it can be up to 50ms and more. And when you are ISP, this can be pain in the neck. Nsteme setup:...
by bokili
Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:52 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 100 Mbps Link Required.
Replies: 19
Views: 4907

Normis,

Is it possible that bonding can sustain about 100 000 simultaneos connections (peers) (tcp and udp protocols at most) ?
by bokili
Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:47 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: single nstreme
Replies: 1
Views: 756

somebody to help?
by bokili
Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:45 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: single nstreme
Replies: 1
Views: 756

single nstreme

I tried to use single nstreme with ptp link with sr5 cards but the problem is when I activate nstreme on both wlans there is no traffic. In this case I use wds..

Is there a trick? Or this cards do not support nstreme?
by bokili
Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:52 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: deauth problem
Replies: 8
Views: 2439

I think that nobody know answer to this problem :)
by bokili
Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:38 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 33mbit Over 29KM @ 5.8ghz!
Replies: 26
Views: 3525

oh, that is different :)

default power of cm9 is 17db not 27 :) it can work up to 20db
by bokili
Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:01 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 33mbit Over 29KM @ 5.8ghz!
Replies: 26
Views: 3525

I really do not understand how you achieved 33Mbps at 29km range with cm9 radios without nstreme... As this is impossible even at 10km..
by bokili
Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:52 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: legacy drivers and wireless test drivers QUESTIONS
Replies: 2
Views: 751

legacy drivers and wireless test drivers QUESTIONS

When you start MT installation you can check option: wireless legacy and wireless test... what is better? Does this legacy option supports SR5 and CM9 cards? Can you connect system which use wireless legacy with system which use wireless test version? Is there incompatibility between 2.9.27 MT versi...
by bokili
Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:45 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 33mbit Over 29KM @ 5.8ghz!
Replies: 26
Views: 3525

Do you use legacy drivers?
Which version of MT you used?
by bokili
Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:11 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 300mbps Pci cards
Replies: 0
Views: 548

300mbps Pci cards

Can this cards:
http://www.trendnet.com/en/products/TEW-623PI.htm

work under mikrotik? :)

Can you implement some drivers? :)
by bokili
Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:20 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 33mbit Over 29KM @ 5.8ghz!
Replies: 26
Views: 3525

channels in turbo mode are 40mhz wide?

I have link 5ghz-turbo, bridge mode, with cm9 radios, distance 5km and bandwidth is about 30mbps but i never achieved more.

Tried with different freq. but nothing..

And you achieved 33Mbps over 29km:)

Is there a trick? :)
by bokili
Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:16 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: 33mbit Over 29KM @ 5.8ghz!
Replies: 26
Views: 3525

How you used 40MHZ channel with CM9 radios?

Is there a trick? :)
by bokili
Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:26 am
Forum: General
Topic: 2 options you should have on 2.10 (3.0)
Replies: 0
Views: 1277

2 options you should have on 2.10 (3.0)

1. You should fix this problem with deauth and extensive data lost... 2. You should have option that logged user from pppoe or vpn can have 2 different speeds to 2 different domains (2 queues) with single public ip address: For example: User who is logged to pppoe concentrator (which is mikrotik int...