Well, I can understand that. VTI is not something that internet operators would use.I can't imagine any major internet operators and distributors that MK has never discussed with them about VTI support.
It helps to show a couple of example log lines. There are some different reasons why these appear.Due to the number of fixes I updated from latest release 16.x to 17beta4. I am now seeing a lot (like thousands) of 'invalid' dropped packets on the firewall.
Yes, they told me it is not planned.Any new information/feedback from mikrotik regarding this?
Maybe a CCR2004-1G-2XS-PCIe in a case? (not sure if that board would work without being in a PCIe slot)Would be nice if Mikrotik develops something like RB5009 but with only 2 SFP+ ports, one for Internet and other for local net that could be attached to SFP+ switch
It was added after the above remarks were made... but IPsec test results not yet, maybe they appear next week.Block Diagram is available:
+1It seems to me that Mikrotik would be better of stop trying to develop everything in house and use some opensource software like unbound/nsd for common tasks especially if they are licensed under some non prohibitive license like BSD in case of unbound...
Except then you have no configuration user interface.container and run whatever you like.
Upgrade Windows. The program is not compatible with Windows 7.I am having same problem. How do I get the correct files for windows 7 ?
Are you sure this problem has been completely fixed?*) bgp - fixed corrupted as-path when received update with empty AS_PATH attribute (introduced in v7.15);
Well, at least we could plan that as a task to be performed during other visits to each location in the months before the upgrade.And even if it would exist: you would need to press button or power off. hahha
You need to file a bug in the support system: https://help.mikrotik.com/servicedeskSorry, in my case I upgraded from 7.15.3 to 7.16
I don't see that issue here. MAC on bridges is still the Admin MAC that was set all the time (I think defconf now sets it as well).All my static leases for other Mikrotik devices got messed up after update to 7.16. Switches and APs .Looks like the MAC on the bridges got reset somehow.
All those manufacturers that make the routers that ISPs supply with the 1Gbps+ internet connections they deliver today.I think we may be talking about different use cases.
Which other manufacturers and products are you comparing Mikrotik to ?
And/or support of the hardware-accellerated PPPoE that some chips support (even low-end ones)...+1 for PPPoE. My CCR2116 maxes out at around 900MBps on my pppoe uplink.
I think Woobm was a short-lived product that did not meet up to its expectations, it has been discontinued and probably is no longer really supported...I can't login to MikroTik with Woobm USB stick.
UPD: Woobm has always worked terribly
/routing rule
add action=lookup disabled=no routing-mark=ISP1 table=ISP1
It is on by default in systems like Windows, Android, iOS, etc.Linux (systemd-networkd): just use "IPv6PrivacyExtensions=true" and done.
Ok I thought the topic was "a simple Site2Site-Connection using two MikroTik-Routers" "with one site using dynamic IPv4". Maybe it shifted somewhere.@pe1chl, AFAIK NordVPN only offers bare IPsec so the OP has no choice here.
You would expect that to work, but the bug reported here is that it does not work (in this version).If i understand correct, can i use this commands as a kind of whitelist?
-faxxe