Anyway, when you have 0KB HDD space available your device is a time bomb. It will not survive a reboot.
So now you need to netinstall it, and after that you can try again.
1d6b Linux Foundation
0001 1.1 root hub
0002 2.0 root hub
0003 3.0 root hub
Certainly for their products intended for, or likely to end up on, the consumer market.Will this apply to Cisco, Juniper, Arista, etc. as well?
Well, maybe because when you have a router that originally had a v6 release before 6.49.13 with IPv6 enabled, and you upgraded it to v7, that wrong rule will still be there and has to be corrected.And your comment about ROS7 scripting is valid in a ROS6 thread because ... ???
That is not a required feature, you can assign the VLAN in the bridge.nope, I want just the existing feature in wifi-qcom driver
do you mean via RADIUS?
Yes, that is bad!Yes this device is restored using backup from another device. Is this something bad? And how to fix?
As I said, I did not know that AMPERE was a "CPU platform".First hit when searching for "Ampere CPU platform"
On the "managed" tab it works. I do not know about the "neighbors" tab, rarely use that.Never has here. Double click on that line and all it does is populate the top box.
Already works!Double click on an entry in Winbox to connect.
It is the fault of your board manufacturer or seller.something cosmetic on X86:
board-name: x86 To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M.
But you pay 3 times the money for a comparable product. Your decision.Dumbest I've heard. Can't even imagine Cisco or Juniper putting out a stable release that bricks the product.
I think not. I still see so many "introduced in 7.13x" bugfixes that I think there have been major changes and 7.12.x should be the longterm release.7.13.5 one more step against Long Term release :)
It is better not to do it. Just remain on v6.How can one run ROS 7 on a hAP lite? I've tried this several times and even just as a CPE (no firewall filter rules, a blank config in fact) it was barely unusable.
Do you observe actual decreased performance? Or are you just obsessed by what is shown in that dialog?Thanks for reply, Its always show 1200Mhz if i use os 7, never change also in Full user load, Only if i downgrade to OS v6 then CPU again show 2600Mhz, Any idea how to solve this issue?
That is not surprising because your question is completely unclear! You ask for a new device and think all existing devices that fit the bill are not right for you...May be you don't understand the direction. Applying for a router, not a wireless one!
Like CCR2004-16G-2S+? Maybe CCR2004-16G-2S+PC?Can we expect new "Ethernet routers" ?
Something with better CPU, RAM and so on ? Like 1GB memory ? x64 bit 4 cores or more ?
Of course not. It was not in the release notes, so why should it be there?We still don't have information about AS
and:Please, stop calling megabits as MB.
MB = megabytes
Mb = megabits
You can do that with two local EoIP interfaces.Bridge-To-Bridge joiner.
Via RADIUS or via access list. I also want to have that, I use it in the old wireless driver.do you mean via RADIUS?Please make dynamic vlan assignment possible for wifi-qcom-ac wireless driver
And even worse: 15.3MB FlashProblem are all ARM wireless devices with 16MB flash.
You can run SwOS on that. Anyway, I would never buy that kind of thing from MikroTik.Too bad the CRS326-24S+2Q+RM is delivered from factory with RouterOSv7 and 64MB of RAM.
True, you should not upgrade that kind of vintage device to RouterOS v7 unless you are prepared to live with performance issues.I do feel that 64MB of RAM is on the low side for ROS7.
/interface detect-internet set detect-interface-list=none
Yes, but a lot of buffering of the traffic is actually a bad idea. Especially when there are not multiple queues and DSCP based priority.More RAM helps at buffering the traffic, at my understanding.
They are no longer sold but they are still supported. Updates for RouterOS are released for this model.What they do have in common CCR1009 and EOL.
That is a different model! And different config as well.
No fasttrack!
Yes, that is great! I have been asking for that for many years...I would like to say THANK YOU VERY MUCH for this improvement in 7.14 beta8:Code: Select all*) traffic-flow - use 64bit counters for v9 and IPFIX flows