MikroTik

Bytezone

Here is the network setup: CCR 1009 (DNS, DHCP and Hotspot) --> APs | |__ RB750 GR3 --> WAN1 |__ RB750 GR3 --> WAN2 |__ RB750 GR3 --> WAN3 |__ RB757 GR4 --> WAN4 Every RB750 is doing Simple QoS for the WAN it's connected to .. (Mangle rules for ICMP, DNS, ACKs and other marked traffic + Queue Tree s...

Bytezone

Not possible with ROS neither UBNT devices unless you change the Stock firmware with the Openwrt.. but that solution puts the device at risk you may find yourself unable to return the Stock firmware again.

Bytezone

Not literally damaging but sure it will cause problems at loading some web pages like yahoo hotmail while users are browsing as well as taking around 10 to 20 second to re-connect pppoe-out interface again with my ISP to get the public ip address every time i modify the value of mtu and mss Guys it ...

Bytezone

Guys as the subject say.. I have adsl line with mtu=1442 (windows -> command prompt -> ping 8.8.8.8 -f -l 1414 with no fragmentation) + 28 = 1442 setting adsl modem in bridge mode and creating pppoe client to connect directly to isp through mikrotik what value should i set with mtu i read on other p...

Bytezone

I don't think you can. The simple queue works independently of queue trees. The simple queues are targeted at the user's IP address, so they're going to hit 100% of the traffic that user generates. The only way to make a simple queue miss some of a user's traffic is by sending it through a differen...

Bytezone

Hello everyone, I'm sure this has been discussed so many times except how to deal with simple queues + packet marks added to shape the traffic instead of queue trees I have to ISP lines ISP_1: 192.168.101.1 and ISP_2: 192.168.102.1 the second ISP is dedicated for traffic based on address-list alread...

Bytezone

That bypasses NAT and filter rules only and doesn't affect simple queues. It's surprisingly hard to exempt certain traffic from rate limiting when using a Hotspot. You can override the simple queues that Hotspots use for rate limiting all traffic via queue trees attached to global-in and global-out...

Bytezone

If you only want to queue to traffic to/from addresses in a list, then you can omit the interfaces and use only the address list. Yup it's working :) would you lead me to the next step if you don't mind because this has been discussed so many times but actually that what confused me !! just looking...

Bytezone

It's not found there .. what package should i have to get it ?

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Bytezone

In the pre-routing chain, add a condition to the rule: in-interface=bridge-local, and change the packet mark from "all" to "upload" Then copy the rule and change the mark from "upload" to "download" and change the in-interface from bridge-local to ether1-gate...

Bytezone

We experienced the similar issues while testing simple queues. This was resolved by turning on rps on the Ethernet interface to allow it to use the multiple cpu's. This may be the bottleneck you are experiencing. Hi Aron, could u please point me right to turning on the rps, where exactly this optio...

Bytezone

stick to UHS-I (UHS-II feats(same to UFS, XQD, which is ~ basically propriatery fork/derrivation of UHS-II))imply extra-contacts and electrial support, underlying, which is most devices lacking aswell as UHS-I support itself, but UHS-I label atleast mean that controller within card - wouldn't be so...

Bytezone

I tested with Samsung microSD Evo and Pro, work very well.
Hotspot ~ 400 active clients, radius interim update 5 mins

Thnx Miracle and indeed Samsung brand microSD Evo is the best in the market but I came eventually with SanDisk Ultra MicroSDHC UHS-I class 10 which is good too

Bytezone

Guys i am running my wifi network with x86 routeros for 2 years and decided to move to CCR1009-x but i need your advice in 2 things - CCR1009 came with microsd card slot and microUSB type AB slot, which one of those u suggest me to move user manager too, forgive me for such a basic question cause in...

Bytezone

If you connect a PC directly to Ethernet 2 (temporary disable the VLAN). What speed do you get? The expected speed of your ISP? the main point as ZeroByte said maybe it's not related to vlans neither bridge settings. just looking at the configuration it's very basic nothing out of the line. the oth...

Bytezone

sure i'm not the only wisp in my area. it's full of 2.4 ghz ubiquiti APs and suffer from the interference and i have some APs 60 mt away from the switch.

Bytezone

As for your speed issues, I'm not sure what might be behind this, but vlan tagging / split horizon shouldn't be slowing you down. Perhaps it's the queue type on your interfaces.[/quote] Sure just like what you said i seriously started thinking it may be something else other than dynamic simple queue...

Bytezone

Ok if i understand you precisely, so in principle this way of doing the host isolation could affect the traffic in case of using low features RB or having so many vlans in the network but in my case it should not affect the performance although it's not professional way of doing host isolation (to b...

Bytezone

It seems problems doesn't end with this product version , i guess i have to think twice before buying one tonight !

Bytezone

Thank you so much ZeroByte, i'm a big fan of you and enjoy learning and reading your guide information every time i take a tour at this forum and yes exactly I followed your guides i created a bridge, added vlans and sat split horizon to 1 on each, created hotspot dhcp of that bridge, the result is ...

Bytezone

Thnx .. sure i will

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk

Bytezone

There is a known hardware issue with a small percentage of CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ models. You are able to return faulty units to your distributor for repair. The units that shipped with RouterOS 6.18 are OK. It is only a small number of units that shipped with earlier RouterOS releases that had the iss...

Bytezone

Greatly appreciate your info thank you yaikun94

Bytezone

the problem is that i don't have one on my hand to give it a try, so it's better to ask before buying one. I'm sure someone has tried rb951 for doing the load balance. BTW the hotspot is configured on another x86 ros so the RB is just for doing the load balancing :) hi, sorry for the late reply. I ...

Bytezone

the problem is that i don't have one on my hand to give it a try, so it's better to ask before buying one.

I'm sure someone has tried rb951 for doing the load balance. BTW the hotspot is configured on another x86 ros so the RB is just for doing the load balancing

Bytezone

ZeroByte .. kindly can you take a look at the post mentioned in the url below.. I really need your suggestions and what to do to solve my issue

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=109927

Bytezone

Guys I got RB750Gr2 (hEX) to do the load balancing for 2 WAN (each one is 4Mb) the speed of connection is so terrible i tried both pcc and nth but nothing changed .. someone suggested that i should get RB951 instead of the RB750Gr2 to do the load balancing.. i don't know is it a hardware problem or ...

Bytezone

Hello guys .. I have a very basic hotspot configuration Open wifi network service. I created VLANs to isolate the Access points from seeing each other along with the client isolation option enabled on each AP to isolate connected clients. APs used on my network are NSM2 bridge mode. APs are connect...

Bytezone

Guys.. can anybody enlighten me on how to adapt Mr. tomas script to work on pppoe client by bridging modems especially the mangle section

..

Internet connection is so terrible in my country i really suffer from repeatedly internet disconnection from my ISP.

Bytezone

Hi.. InfinityMVS.. Did you get the mangling script to work on pppoe connections ??

Bytezone

I'm having the same issue just like giomanda, the speed drops randomly and comes back normally to all active users connected on hotspot based on vlan interfaces..

Hope somebody can give us a clue

Bytezone

how interesting to see exactly what u look for !! :D cadamuroa .. actually i was searching the whole day for such configuration and i came to the same point which is how to share the hotspot page across all the vlan subnets.. Well appreciate your help in this :) cheers.. Hi Bytezone, how are you? I...

Bytezone

how interesting to see exactly what u look for !!

cadamuroa .. actually i was searching the whole day for such configuration and i came to the same point which is how to share the hotspot page across all the vlan subnets..

Well appreciate your help in this

cheers..

Bytezone

Yup sure jarda.. i will make sure to keep you updated with the latest once i finish what i want here at this post

Bytezone

Hi thank you BartoszP you gave me a lot more good options to look for .. all i need then is to look at the market for such devices as i guess this is the ultimate solution to add a local website to my network.

Thanks to all of you BartoszP, jarda and gotsprings for the help really appreciate that

Bytezone

Thank you so much jarda for your valuable suggestions.. sure i know mikrotik can't act like a web server that's why i mentioned static website (no need for database or support php libraries) and for the hosting service on the internet.. it's really a good idea but the problem is such a website needs...

Bytezone

Guys I really need your help here .. Due to the lack of electricity on my country (critical situation here in Yemen) I'm runnying my public wifi network based on Solar power so there's no additional power capacity to add one more x86 pc as a web server (at least i will need another 300 Watt to do th...

Bytezone

Even though it's existing as a feature on x86 ROS v6.33, really disappointed i see the fasttrack-connection on the action menu and can not use it !! .. thanks nz_monkey I hope mikrotik people do their job for this matter so i can enjoy this great feature like my friends here.

Bytezone

Can anybody confirm whether it's supported on x86 .. if not what should i do to use it?
I have v6.33 installed on my computer.

Bytezone

Hi.. guys .. this is my first post on mikrotik forum OK i will jump ahead to the problem .. most of the users "created in user manager" has to input their login information "twice" before the success to login !! for first time the "invalid password" appears to the user ...

Bytezone

This method and other similar ones are doing great ..

but the real problem comes from the client side .. you see sometimes active users don't use the internet (tx rate 0 bps) and they reserve an equal bandwidth for doing nothing!!

Search found 41 matches