MikroTik

human1982

Still unsolved problem:
ARM client with NV2 is disconnected from AP without reason (ROS 6.44). In log is - lost connection, synchronization timeout
Solution? Reboot client from LAN side. Ticket#2019012222004029

Watchdog?

human1982

With ubiquiti AF HD we are very close to have 100 mb/s download speed with 10 MHz for PtP NOW for AP side with cambium we have >300 Mb/s@20 MHz using ultra dense mu-mimo technology So if DISC Lite5 ac DiscG-5acD 240mbit (if it really works) cost is 45$, what is the cost of cambium per mbit? This is...

human1982

I think when u fix mixed mode for mipsbe and arm in nv2 u should make nv3 only for arm devices for new bases. This hardware is very good to be competitive and cheep comparing to cambium.

regards

human1982

... and second, according to CZ rules I can set 5480MHz ...
Which channel width do you use when trying to set centre frequency to 5480MHz?

5480Ce in Poland too. 5470-5725.

human1982

55 hold ping time safe.

human1982

Try auto tdma 55 fixdownlink auto mcs and re. Ptmp. Ptp - tdma 2ms mcs on what you have.

human1982

I have a 17Km p2p link using MAnt30 solid dishes and NetMetal5 units. The link has never performed satisfactorily in the 2 years it has been running : using nstreme we see decent throughput but the link disconnects completely and reconnects, every few hours (even though it works perfectly well in b...

human1982

I too!
We need nstreme without disconnects!

Nstreme works fine in 15 times hardware retries and dis timeout 00:00:15 long guard msc11-12-13. But i thing with ac nv2 1ms it would be stable 200mbit. When?

human1982

Do U folks have a test base room for abaut 50-80 cpe like cambium? It would be much eisier to do tests. Best regards from Poland. Yes, of course. We have multiple anechoic chambers with robotic installation stands with tens of CPEs mounted. Seems that some situations are simply unique So maybe some...

human1982

Do U folks have a test base room for abaut 50-80 cpe like cambium? It would be much eisier to do tests. Best regards from Poland.

human1982

It is better. N 911G to sq ping is stable and stable 100mbit to sq. But. For waiting i thing u should give level 4 for all devices for micro bases. As other folks told ya, to much time waiting. Seriosly. Fix downlink- 65 mcs default, tdma auto.

human1982

Working. Latency tho working?

human1982

that speed test is going to one client or to all clients together?

To 2 clients getting 80mbit 1x1 auto tdma ccq 70 and 85 so i think is`t getting better. Work on latency in overhead situation please.

human1982

Add me to the list of disasters with the 6.42. I also have an OmniTik 5HnD. With 6.42 running nv2 with about 15 SXT5 lite clients, the ping time went crazy, super jittery with a lot of timeouts, plus I couldn't maintain a winbox connection to the SXTs, winbox file transfers kept failing and overall...

human1982

What happens is you use nv2-qos=default and second test what happens if you use dynamic-downlink instead of fixed-downlink mode? fixed http://www.wireless-dsl.de/shared/nv2-fixed.jpg dyn dowblink http://www.wireless-dsl.de/shared/nv2-dyn.jpg I was talking abaout this, i was testing speed test and t...

human1982

Does anyone see any improvements in real life? Ooh yes. We used to get not more than 15mbps per client with sectors with more than 30 clients when all clients are active. Because of drop of performance when sector has more than 30 clients we were discussing migrating to another vendor but this vers...

human1982

We will be migrating from 711 to arm but there is no devices! Wtf! May be some?

human1982

350m how can i get ?

human1982

We will be migrating wrom 711 to 433 arm but there is no devices! Wtf! May be some?

human1982

Hello,

Would this fix work for PtP installations?

Kind regards.
p2p nstreme fixed

N

human1982

Hello,

Would this fix work for PtP installations?

Kind regards.

p2p nstreme fixed

human1982

First 2 days test on 2 AP 20 Mhz fixed downlink 67 tdma period size auto client 33 all client signal goog below -50 all modulation good real world test in the peak time we have the same performance of 6.40.5 no download improvments but we have issue with the upload tha is aorund 256kb/s often less ...

human1982

Next mistake, sq noise -106, 711 -117, wtf mates. Two different stations can absolutely have different noise floors, since they are in different physical locations. Same test location. Something is wrong with noise floor with 711 old stuff. Rx i crazy, doing manualy noise floor on -100 then problem...

human1982

Next mistake, sq noise -106, 711 -117, wtf mates.

human1982

Hello! When sq or other 711 get speed full test others get ping 200ms. If fix ratio 75/25 the same. Shoul it work then fine?
4 core=500mbit 600mhz=200mbit

human1982

Testing, working good at a/n Ce with configured mcs up to 5 and 13 (75 nad 150mbit), guard interval long, period size 2ms, cell 10km, dynamic downlink ratio 50% Any chance for period size 1,5 or 2,5ms?

regards
Mateusz

human1982

6.35rc49 NV2 qos works very good, ping in low, ap control capacity of the client well. Could u add a second Wieless Protocol nv2 (ex nv2-ptp, old named nv2-ptmp) for ptp only, with some special features to improove it? Ex lower the ping and more overhead control to stable the links? It could be the...

human1982

6.35rc49 NV2 qos works very good, ping in low, ap control capacity of the client well. Could u add a second Wieless Protocol nv2 (ex nv2-ptp, old named nv2-ptmp) for ptp only, with some special features to improove it? Ex lower the ping and more overhead control to stable the links? It could be the ...

human1982

If station mcs is mcs 5, then station tx limit is x. This would be helpfull to isolate some bad singnal clients from the rest and control jumps of high latency and speed when bad station is downloading. In Nstream no lost conections, in NV2 higher global speed, in 802.11 better hotspot. This functio...

Search found 29 matches

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: v6.44beta [testing] is released!

Re: Nv2 best performance

Re: Nv2 best performance

Re: MT alternatives for 17Km link?

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: v6.43rc [release candidate] is released!

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for 60 GHz solutions

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: Significant improvement for wireless Nv2 PtMP

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

Feature Request: Real time MCS Queue in Wireless Tables