Sorry, most people find that netinstall "doesn't work" but it's usually because they didn't follow every step
An alternative method to downgrade is to upload the npk for a previous version by pasting it into winbox then under the packages menu click "downgrade"
It should be pretty easy, for VLAN 101 for instance: /interface vlan add name=VL101 vlan-id=101 interface=bridge1 /ip address add address=192.168.101.1/24 interface=VL101 /interface bridge vlan add bridge=bridge1 tagged=sfp1,sfp2,sfp3,ether1 vlan-ids=101 More info here: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wik...
At the very least you will probably want a TTL Serial adapter rather than the usual RS232 one you'd normally use, RS232 can signal with voltages from something like -15V to +15V whereas TTL will be 0-3 or 5v
LIV2 - Have you tried to Netinstall your device and reset it only after that? Seems that default configuration has been changed to something else by using configuration script on Netinstall. I've tried Netinstall ensuring "Apply Default Config" is ticked with various versions with the fol...
After upgrading my mAP2n to 6.41.2 I've found that doing /system reset-configuration no-defaults=no results in an empty configuration, and I can only connect to the router via mac-telnet
Same result when using the reset button to do a config reset, even on 6.42rc24 it also doesn't work
With 6.41 this changed, master port was replaced with bridge functionality https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Switch_Chip_Features#Bridge_Hardware_Offloading Basically you need to create a bridge and add each port to that, this will still be hardware accelerated by the switch just the config has ...
Any traffic you wish to send over the WLAN will need a route, if you add a static route for 8.8.8.8 with a gateway of 192.168.12.1 it will work, it is not enough to simply specify an interface for your ping.
Have you ensured that the default route has been added?
/ip route print
You should see a route for 0.0.0.0/0 to your gateway, if not make sure you've enabled add-default-route for your dhcp client
Hi, I noticed in recent releases of RouterOS there is a /system routerboard mode-button menu where you can set a script to run when the mode button is pressed This doesn't appear to work at all on my wap2n and if I enable it then do a print/export nothing is exported It would be nice if this could w...
@Strods Since this new crs Poe series is out, so this version belongs to the same of crs1xx having the same features or it have new features available on crs3xx series? Enviado do meu iPad usando Tapatalk It would be nice to finally get LACP on the CRS125. the fact that we haven't got it by now and...
Interesting, if you call something that just uses your resources "a vulnerability", when you can clearly protect your device against this (like with firewall), would you also call Chrome a vulnerability? It uses tons of RAM on my machine. Does chrome bring down your business by allowing r...
Sucks about ports 17 and up :( Re: VLANs I'm surprised. when you upgraded to 6.41 it should've modified their interface parameter automatically, I'm also suprised setting them to the physical port actually works too because usually with a bridge you need to set the vlan's interface to the bridge. CR...
Perhaps it's a bug, your config looks fine to me. I also have a CRS125 with DHCP server running on the bridge interface with no issues whatsoever. I did notice that you had this under the bridge ports config {noformat} add bridge=bridge comment=defconf disabled=yes interface="WAN - SFP1" {...
Hello Sindy, thank you ! In this case, maybe I should to got the way of future und to adapt my configuration on both wAP-ac to the new bridge ... any recommendation how to start, what to read, etc. ? Thanks ! The change in bridging is to do with hardware switching I thought, and since the wAP-ac do...
That's weird, all the ports should have worked, perhaps there is something wrong with the hardware? You could try resetting to defaults and see if you can get a lease on the higher ports. the default config places every port in the same vlan with a dhcp server configured to hand out addresses on the...
You can configure vlans using the following config, note that it is extremely important that you run the master-port sets otherwise it will not work properly, the default sets every interfaces master-port to ether1 which essentially bridges the LANs and your WAN side connection. The NAT should have ...
Also did you do this bit? it is important that you set the master-port=none for all of the ports otherwise it will not work properly /interface ethernet set [ find default-name=ether1 ] master-port=none set [ find default-name=ether2 ] master-port=none set [ find default-name=ether3 ] master-port=no...
I saw you mentioned PPPoE in the original post, I've updated the above config with that in mind, you can substitute your own username and password in there You should be able to shape the ports to 10Mbits to each VLAN like as follows. you can just remove the lines mentioning whichever interface you ...
This should be pretty easy to do without having to worry about vlans, with your requirement you can simply configure each interface as a network interface on the router. the following config should do the trick I think. You will want to adjust the ether1 ip and might want to add some rules to the fi...
According to the wiki, if you have enabled protected-bootloader mode you need to hold the reset button for a certain amount of time to restore the ability to netboot, though this will completely wipe the NAND including your config https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RouterBOARD_settings#Protected_...
On both my CRS125 and my mAP 2n installing 6.38 results in a unit that won't boot, for both I had to revert to an earlier version using netboot. is this a known issue?
/interface vlan add interface=ether2-master name=vlan6 vlan-id=6 /interface ethernet switch vlan add ports=ether2-master vlan-id=6 This successfully gets a dhcp lease on that vlan and tags traffic out of that switchport anyway Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic # ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFAC...
Same here, I am looking to buy a new router and I'd really love one of these, afaik the only real difference is the case right? so what's taking so long?