How long are UTP cables between RB5009 and powered devices?Unfortunately, no, this setup is not working.
Yes; MK to MK.
I made them all static for simplicity. I exported to txt file, but I can copy and paste. Where do I paste?
Think on your dst-nat rule you are missing:
Code: Select allin-interface-list=WAN
I don't even need Samba service nor DLNA.
It must be quite expensive to manufacture all that heatsink for nothing.
Mb someone know is there "dynamic vlans in qcom-ac" in plans of smth like that?
SwOS Lite or SwOS or both?
No mkx, I demand that new posters continue to baffle us with minimalist approaches and lack of information.
No.Is there any way to foce CAPSMAN not to restart Wifi when loosing connectivity with CAP ?
And what does /interface ethernet ether2 once show?Here's the output of /interface ethernet print detail
As mentioned in post #5 tested also different /64 on both br_wan and br_lan, they can not reach each other
Web-proxy (transparent) ?
I also notice that the AX3 router has no switch chips ...
Wasn't it @anav who said that?Where were you when I said ...
As the rumours go it'll stay this way ... i.e. no bridging between wifi and wireless drivers ... ever.So no, bridging still doesn't work between old/new wireless packages.
I don't think CRS310 is that sexyFeel for you buddy, looking at at CRS310 I just took out of the box.
Anytime you want to wireguard in and look around let me know.
Great. But the command name is non-descriptive. Does it reset all the profiles as well?Actually, it does exist.In 7.13 ability to reset /interface/wifi to defaults would be welcome for all WiFi5 devices previously running legacy wireless driver.
So đ and ž are fine?If you have any special characters in your user name, for eg. š,č,ć
And IMHO the possibility to override settings from an inherited profile is neat in some cases.
Not necessarily different cell tower but definitely different band (2600MHz now vs. 1800MHz before).Other cell tower and other band so may be normal.
Why not provide a migration script?
/ipv6 firewall filter set dst-port=33434-33534 !port [find comment="defconf: accept UDP traceroute" port=33434-33534]
If they did it, then it was a poor design decission.It still needs some user-land program to manage static routes, and I strongly suspect they put everything routing into a single binary.And for static routes linux doesn't need to run any daemons.
Did you adjust discover-interface-list (and/or interface list membership)? Under /ip/neighbor/discovery-settings/ ...Sooo I ended up changing the access points to the VLANs and then setting ports to Admit-only-vlan-tagged.. but now they dont show up on /ip neighbor print.
Beware that by installing legacy wireless package on hAP ax3 (to get legacy capsman) you're loosing wireless on hAP ax3 itself. See viewtopic.php?t=202578See wireless package for controlling legacy wifi devices.
when you have it configured as a switch without a firewall, is fast track even a thing?
Other than the radio interferance, is there any issue using 2 WiFi cards on a single device?
They are MIMO antennae.But are specifically the ac3/ax3 antennas actually a MIMO setup?
Or more simply the 2.4 GHz radio is connected to one antenna and the 5 Ghz radio is connected to the other?