Agree to that. I was just explaining to @OP why he can't manage device via ether1 if they're running factory default config (which doesn't bridge ether1 with the rest of ports AFAIK).If device is fully bridged it doesn't matter if ether1 and 2 are connected
If would be nice, if Winbox had told me about the full disk when saving a configuration.
Gosh ... doesn't everybody (and their favourite pet) skip top results from search engines?Be carefull with the fast (sponsored) answer of the Google (AI based?) search.
When I close the dialog the value I get in the CLI is wrong again.
I just leave it at "LAN", that seems to work for me.
RBD53iG-5HacD2HnD = hAP AC3
This one should be made rule number -1 ... or whatever takes to make it to very top of rules.4. Do NOT use quickset
I also don't see any high CPU usage, this is a screenshot while doing the upload part of a speedtest (I assume this is what you meant with profiler?):
internal-path-cost=10 path-cost=10 trusted=yes
... VLAN1 ... leave it alone, since it costs nothing.
Not everybody knows the name for it ... and certainly not everybody knows how to use it properly ... hence post by @TheCat12 (which is, unlike yours, useful)this is considered PtP addressing and works fine
hAP ac2 has 3 more ethernet ports, so more buffer on switch chip is in use ... perhaps that's a life saver? LOL... on 1 cap AC using wifi-qcom-ac driver...
Oddly enough, no such issue on ac2 with exact same config (same RAM amount so why ??).
If i connect directly to my ISP's router the firesticks (2) will work but not if behind the mikrotik
Many datacenters don't ... in which case the box part kocks in.As long there is a workspace with 🪟 ...
If only you'd taken the opportunity to change that meaningless (if not entirely misleading) name, now that its Windoze shackles are finally off :)
The new one is able to hardware accelerate more then one bridge and my problems have ceased.
In another words - been there, seen that.
Nothing special, just IP address, default route and DNS server address ... just like any other IP device in your network.Is there some particular setup needed on the ‘station bridge’ to get internet connectivity for the RouterOS on that wAP AC itself? Or is it possible at all in this mode?
/interface list member
add comment=defconf interface=sfp-sfpplus1 list=WAN
No, not on CRS3xx devices (if you want wirespeed operations).Is it possible to create VLANs directly on the Switch Chip without creating a bridge?
Which device are you using?I am now thinking about activating L3 Hw Offloading, any suggestions?
And I didn't imply that. However, posting something about own disappointment on vendor's discussion forum may imply something (and it's everybody's guess what the implication might be).
It seems to me like mtest001 is not blaming anyone.
My link is 10ft apart at 7 feet height, unobstructed line of sight. In short I am connecting one side of the my office with the other side.
> scp ./routeros-7.15.3-mipsbe.npk username@192.0.2.1:/flash
Just wondering why you want to run ROS in your storage device though
Yes. So far.So for RB5009 it is a pure software NAT router. I mean it doing NAT in Linux Kernel without using hardware accelerator in the soc,right?
Disabling HW offload is not necessary for the raw rule approach, and affects LAN bridging performance, so only keep it disabled while sniffing.
what is your plan?