If nothing else helps, ask your personal numerologistAny reason to choose 1 over the other?
Perhaps someone from Mikrotik can comment on this officially?
Right. Thanks for correcting me.It's not quite correct, the second rule should be:
Let a router be a router, let an access point be an access point.
As soon as I select the CRS the ROS file is removed.
Owning a private vehicle, let along driving one, is a capital offense in NYC.
Unfortunately it is needed. And if you can't make config or installation slimer, then the problem will re-occur.... I will to if needed ...
I will but, one should not think that more slaps are better!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhJQp-q ... xhcA%3D%3D
That is to say, there appears to be a bug in the member ranking system.
This can be allocated as a separate option or package or made disabled by default with a warning that by enabling ...My guess: supporting H2 blows the ROS bundle out of 16MB flash.
it should work with prefix delegation, they route over the dynamic address.
How exactly did you get that "fixed" prefix?From my provider i got an fixed ipv6 prefix ::/48
So the new WiFi driver has less features that the old Wireless driver![]()
I'd say it's the same model. PDF contains a render, you showed a photo.here is information from an official source
https://box.mikrotik.com/f/1f880747e77346a3bf7f/
And this is a slightly different model according to the photo.
I'd probably do it as well ... but so far I didn't find the right command. Can you enlighten me?Removing dynamic entry is not needed. Just reprovision. Same result but the way of handling it is different (re-apply versus destroying, I prefer the positive approach)
... if the cost of this unit is between 18 to 20 USD ...
/interface/pppoe-client/monitor 0 once
Why the question?GPON - True or false.
If you upgraded to 7.19beta from 7.17.x or older, then you may have to properly set-up device mode prior to downgrading https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... evice-modeWorse, I cannot downgrade.
/console/clear-history
cant upgrade .. have u found a solution without netinstall the device ?
Yes ... if switch chip supports L3HW offload ... which switch chip in L009 doesn't.Wouldn't it be better to use one port from the hardware offload chip as a WAN port as long as I have it logically separated from the rest of the bridged LAN ports?
Certainly something to carefully look at and consider a netinstall!
See? That's exactly why one should stay away from VLAN 1 in any incarnation (PVID, VID, anything).Is OP saying not to use VLAN1 as in PVID1? Not use for what? Forwarding? Admin VLAN? Its confusing...
Agree that it's a good way. And it seems that it's the correct way (considering that may people will likely end up using multiple APs and hence CAPsMAN).But that's my choice to do it this way.
Are there any other parts of RouterOS that bypass Netfilter filter chains? DNS maybe?
In short: IPv6 fasttrack is available since ROS v7.18.
Offending devices are usually only using 2GHz bands.
IM confused, why are you trying to SSH between internal devices ...
Which screenshot? I don't recognize any screenshot to originate from pfsense.Isn't pfsenses port 1 already configures as trunk port as on my screenshot above?
What I meant was that you had doubts about uploading supout.rif anywhere in complete form.No, I don't have any doubts that it's uploaded.But using it means that supout.rif file is already uploaded to MT's site ... which I believe @teslasystems has his doubts about ...
now there is the viewer directly on the mikrotik site
https://mikrotik.com/client/supout
But the flash folder is missing, which means that mechanism is somehow not working as intended ...
What are you doing that is attracting an attack??
Is just one-post-wait-immediate-reply-and-go-away user.