You haven't mentioned what the log is currently mentioning.Code: Select all/system logging action ...
It's actually shooting under / between the branches.
could this solve it?
https://github.com/ncravino/mikrotik_en ... our-router
In such a case it _might_ also be worthwhile to export config, netinstall device and then re-apply config again.
I think the problem is DOH, if I do a torch I see requests towards 8.8.8.8:443. so AdGuard is skipped. How do I manage these requests to process everything from AdGuard?
:put [ /interface/ethernet/get sfp-sfpplus1 sfp-ignore-rx-los ]
What to do to resolve the issue?
But I didn't like the fact that with usage of datapath I got a tagged wireless traffic
You can. But TPlink has to perform NAT also for "alien" subnets on LAN side ... and I've no idea if that's possible or not.You cannot have the rb5009 providing separate subnets without double NAT ...
... if L3 hashing policy is used by them
Is there a guide I could follow that helps me to setup WiFi?
If L3HW is configured, then your CRS could even route at wirespeed ... but yes, PPPoE is a deal-breaker here.If I'm wrong, please correct me then. If the PPPoE authentication is removed, logically, the product would only function like a switch and wouldn't be unnecessarily burdened.
They may be shiny, but fun level is anywhere near what RB3011 provides: full 1U dimension, LCD display, two switch chips, etc. Only colour comes near RB3011's black... brand new shiny RB5009
I'm not sure. I some related tings (such as "received packet with own MAC address" or something like that) are logged even by default, not sure if there are some more extensive loggings available for STP.Is there any way I can log those events?
So ... what else is there to try execept for the trashcan ?
Default cap config it's called bridgeLocal.
... i.e. it's like GRUB so once RouterOS boots, I'd think it go away once boot.
So there's a way ... and I sense you're getting some will ... to do it properly... there is a huge difference in price, the price of the MOCA would allow me to re-route a CAT5e cable from the first floor.
Thanks, I suspect this too. But where to set GW for Bridge? See pics attached.
Also, unless I'm missing it, there isn't any masqerade stetting between the wan and lan. Not familiar with capsman, so could be in that already.
What does "low 2.4ghz coverage" mean exactly?I am more worried about the low 2.4ghz coverage.
Unless that QCN-6102 in between has something to do with it ...
I could change all 1,000,000,000 aspects of my life to 24 hour UTC.
Is there still a wil to overdrive the PA?
EDIT: Interestingly, it appears to apply to the LTE device. When I tried to apply it to the hEX, I got the error below.
The "hEX refresh" does not have IPsec test results, ...
The problem was that you did not have a rule to accept port forwarded connections!
do you have any troubleshooting idea I could start with ?
Did you follow the link from my post?It would be nice to know what the diameter is ...