Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 128 matches

by Florian
Mon Nov 13, 2023 8:10 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.13beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 467
Views: 87006

Re: v7.13beta [testing] is released!

Wifiwave 2 working on hap ac2 here, well done ! Slight increase in performances, and wpa3 available, nice !

Edit : and the ipv6 deprecated addresses is fixed too.
by Florian
Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:36 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.12.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 252
Views: 90684

Re: v7.12 [stable] is released!

This is actually already fixed in 7.13 which is coming soon. Deprecate message will not be sent if actual prefix is re-used.
7.13? not 7.12.1 ???

I hope it's soon anyway, it's breaking some ipv6 scenarios...
by Florian
Thu Apr 20, 2023 11:23 am
Forum: General
Topic: "Routing Table" Parameter for IPv6 Routes Not in Effect (v7.5) [SOLVED]
Replies: 17
Views: 3577

Re: "Routing Table" Parameter for IPv6 Routes Not in Effect (v7.5) [SOLVED]

Great, so have fun! 😊

Wondering why this is required for IPv6 though, but IPv4 works without.
Thx you, I had the same problem.
by Florian
Wed Mar 22, 2023 1:44 pm
Forum: General
Topic: "Routing Table" Parameter for IPv6 Routes Not in Effect (v7.5) [SOLVED]
Replies: 17
Views: 3577

Re: "Routing Table" Parameter for IPv6 Routes Not in Effect (v7.5) [SOLVED]

Hi,

7.8, not corrected. Same use case as the OP. Work great in ipv4, but ipv6 doesn't use a custom route table, just the main one.
by Florian
Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:57 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

moderator action
That's not the point. The point is the gap between fasttrack ipv4 and non-fasttrack ipv6.
by Florian
Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:20 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

7.8beta, still no fastrack for ipv6, come on mikrotik, pleeeaaaase (having say that, you're doing good on multiple fronts with latest releases, congrats).
by Florian
Mon Dec 26, 2022 8:39 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.7rc is released!
Replies: 259
Views: 88413

Re: v7.7rc is released!

The vast majority of apps are still using the OS dns servers. The few who doesn't, I redirect them to my own server. Now, If some apps are doing doh, well, we're screwed...
by Florian
Sun Oct 02, 2022 11:22 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

That's cool :)

(But TBF, I don't want to switch to OpenWRT, I like RouterOS)
by Florian
Wed Sep 21, 2022 11:00 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]
Replies: 22
Views: 15105

Re: Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]

Any news on HSGMII support on device without switch chip, like some tilera CCR ?
by Florian
Mon Sep 05, 2022 12:23 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

I get l3hw offload is important, and good job on that, but for a lot of hardware without modern switch ships, fast track/path is still a must. I hope we will see this in the next 6 months.
by Florian
Mon Aug 29, 2022 11:11 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.5rc is released!
Replies: 86
Views: 20814

Re: v7.5rc is released!

They can work on multiples things at the same time. If they already fixed something, good.
by Florian
Tue Aug 09, 2022 2:18 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49.6 [stable] is released!
Replies: 56
Views: 84608

Re: v6.49.6 [stable] is released!

So, are ROS stable releases only v7 now ?
by Florian
Sun Jul 17, 2022 4:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Recursive Routes in RoS 7.x
Replies: 35
Views: 17913

Re: Recursive Routes in RoS 7.x

Read Paragraph I.
viewtopic.php?t=182373
Thx a lot !
by Florian
Sat Jul 16, 2022 8:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Recursive Routes in RoS 7.x
Replies: 35
Views: 17913

Re: Recursive Routes in RoS 7.x

Hi.

Any news about this behaviour with 7.3 and 7.4 rc ?
by Florian
Sat Jun 04, 2022 8:24 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

Any news ? IF it arrives, will this be ROS 7 only, or V6 too ?

Thx.
by Florian
Sat May 07, 2022 7:40 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]
Replies: 22
Views: 15105

Re: [SOLVED !!!] Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]

Does any 2.5Gb/s Ethernet interface support HSGMII or vice versa or both ?
In other words, beside 2.5Gb/s speed, what does an Ethernet interface need to support to fully implement HSGMII ?
Nope, it has to be 2.5g+HSGMII compatible. A lot of 2.5g interfaces are not HSGMII compatible.
by Florian
Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:19 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]
Replies: 22
Views: 15105

Re: [SOLVED !!!] Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]

Thanks Mikrotik !

Too bad I got a CCR2004 16G 2S+, the 2 SFP+ beeing wired direct on the CPU...

I'll try it with the CRS305 :)
I don't get why they can't add the support by the cpu. The switch asic is more "compatible" than the one into the cpu ? idk....
by Florian
Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:13 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 101209

Re: v7.3beta [testing] is released!

*) sfp - added 2.5Gbps rate for SFP+ and QSFP+ interfaces on 98DXxxxx and 98PX1012 switches (requires disabled auto-negotiation);



It is possible to add this for TileGX based product ? I would love to be able to use my 2.5gb ONT HGSMII directly into one of the sfp+ port...
by Florian
Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:28 pm
Forum: General
Topic: dhcp-client stuck in rebinding state when moved to new network
Replies: 7
Views: 15476

Re: dhcp-client stuck in rebinding state when moved to new network

I still encounter this bug from time to time. Funny thing is, If i disable the dhcp client for this interface, internet detect immediately create a new one, and it's getting a good ip and everything...
by Florian
Sat Jan 08, 2022 11:28 am
Forum: General
Topic: Recursive Routes in RoS 7.x
Replies: 35
Views: 17913

Re: Recursive Routes in RoS 7.x

Interested in an answer since I use recursive routes to manage failover between 2 links.
by Florian
Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:35 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

Lack of route cache doesn't explain the noticeable decrease in speed like we see,speedtest or other usages...

And hell, even with V6 some of us want fastpath for ipv6.
by Florian
Thu Dec 09, 2021 6:43 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

Or no action at all and just happily using the router...
Living only for benchmark is not very useful...
Why are you talking about benchmark ? We should just accept that ipv6 is way slower than fastracker ipv4, at a time where ipv6 is more and more used ?
by Florian
Wed Dec 08, 2021 9:28 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Re: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

Some people are noticing than ipv6 is slower on RoS7 vs RoS6 on some hardware. It's increase the need of fasttrack imo....
by Florian
Sat Oct 16, 2021 9:36 am
Forum: General
Topic: HGSMII for 2.5 Gbps link
Replies: 8
Views: 4130

Re: HGSMII for 2.5 Gbps link

+1 please.

1036 owner here.
by Florian
Sat Oct 09, 2021 9:47 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49 [stable] is released!
Replies: 219
Views: 95212

Re: v6.49 [stable] is released!

No when you repartition to 2 partitions, the first one will contain what your entire flash contains now, and the second one will be empty.
Check that the current disk usage is (much) less than half of the total, and you will be safe.
Perfect, thx :)
by Florian
Sat Oct 09, 2021 8:23 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49 [stable] is released!
Replies: 219
Views: 95212

Re: v6.49 [stable] is released!

Thx a lot :)

EDIT : wait, will I lose my current partition / config when I do the repartition command ?
by Florian
Sat Oct 09, 2021 7:47 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49 [stable] is released!
Replies: 219
Views: 95212

Re: v6.49 [stable] is released!

Hello, I upgraded my CCR1009 yesterday… and lost my internet connection. My SERCOMM FGS202 SFP Module isn't recognized anymore. Problem is, it's a quite widely used one in France since the main ISP Orange ships it with their Internet box. When you have such a router (i.e. not one of the new home ro...
by Florian
Mon Oct 04, 2021 11:49 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 36
Views: 19197

Re: v6.49rc [testing] is released!



I can confirm I see the same behavior here.
Some days ago I got the confirmation from MikroTik that they could now reproduce this problem (with the extensive description of test scenario I provided) and are working on fixing it.
Thx for this information.
by Florian
Mon Oct 04, 2021 8:05 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.49rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 36
Views: 19197

Re: v6.49rc [testing] is released!

In SUP-51076 I am discussing memory leaks in the DNS resolver and was requested to test an internal beta56 which unfortunately was not available in the architecture of my test router. Now I see this rc1 and this item does not appear in the changelog, also it appears not to be solved (still testing)...
by Florian
Sat Sep 18, 2021 9:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DoH overrides DNS Static RegEx
Replies: 11
Views: 3261

Re: DoH overrides DNS Static RegEx

To bypass the problem, I'm using 2 Routerboards in the same LAN

in the first router, DNS is configured with FWD entries and /ip dns set servers=<the second MIkrotik's IP>
in the second one, DNS is configured with DoH.

It works.
I do that too, but tbh it should work with only one device :D
by Florian
Tue Sep 14, 2021 3:34 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc3 [development] is released!
Replies: 172
Views: 49138

Re: v7.1rc3 [development] is released!

Also, on website is written that cAP ac is IPQ-4018 based and has 128MB of RAM, but i've logged onto my AP and it says its IPQ-4019 based and size of memory is 256MB? Winbox shows wrong values? You are one of the lucky. When hAP AC2 (and looks like cAP too) was lauched, Mikrotik had problems with s...
by Florian
Tue May 25, 2021 2:08 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 176
Views: 50585

Feature Request : IPv6 Fasttrack

Hello there. Creating this dedicated topic after reading the post of raimondsp : https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=175369#p859010 ... . We cannot do Fasttrack offloading until the software IPv6 Fasttrack gets implemented. The latter is on the TODO list (backlog) but not on the roadm...
by Florian
Mon May 24, 2021 10:01 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!
Replies: 377
Views: 241148

Re: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!

It's a pity that L3 offloading is limited to IPv4 only, but it's impressive nevertheless. I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that it is only limited to IPv4 for now, and L3 offloading for IPv6 is coming. Exactly. L3 HW for IPv6 is on the roadmap. And any news on fasttrack for ipv6 on CCRs (...
by Florian
Mon Feb 08, 2021 6:12 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]
Replies: 22
Views: 15105

Re: Feature request: HSGMII for SFP >1Gbps synchronization. [SOLVED]

Any news ? Is it possible for a futur v7 version, at least for hardware with 10gb ports ?

Thx.
by Florian
Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Question]: Anyone running a MA5671A GPON ONU at 2.5 GBit/s
Replies: 7
Views: 4088

Re: [Question]: Anyone running a MA5671A GPON ONU at 2.5 GBit/s

In that case, 2.5gb support mean HSGMII support. Mikrotik devices , afaik, don't support it.
by Florian
Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

I consider fasttrack only a quick bandaid to improve the performance of underpowered routers. It is always the first thing that I disable as it often is incompatible with what I want to do. IMHO the only furure-proof way of handling traffic is to buy a device that can route it without fasttrack or ...
by Florian
Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:47 am
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

Are there there any comments from MikroTik about the missing fasttrack support for IPv6? Is it at least a planned feature?
I don't think so :/
by Florian
Thu Dec 03, 2020 2:14 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta3 [development] is released!
Replies: 261
Views: 78634

Re: v7.1beta3 [development] is released!

Almost every device out there based on ipq4018/4019 has atleast 256MB of RAM. With a few exceptions, like RT-AC58U which struggles to not throw errors because of the very limited memory available out of the 128MB total. So I wouldn't keep my hopes up to see it running in the future on lower require...
by Florian
Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:54 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!
Replies: 385
Views: 152876

Re: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!

Currently we are having issues with beta3 booting on TILE architecture. Beta3 will be available when we get these issues sorted out. ... just stop the Tile hardwares, even Mipsbe, Smips, and please no more 16mb and 128mb, providing cheap hardwares is ok but they you are going to spend more money to...
by Florian
Fri Nov 20, 2020 7:29 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!
Replies: 385
Views: 152876

Re: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!

Currently we are having issues with beta3 booting on TILE architecture. Beta3 will be available when we get these issues sorted out. ... just stop the Tile hardwares, even Mipsbe, Smips, and please no more 16mb and 128mb, providing cheap hardwares is ok but they you are going to spend more money to...
by Florian
Thu Oct 08, 2020 6:37 am
Forum: General
Topic: DoH config ignores local static entries
Replies: 7
Views: 1574

Re: DoH config ignores local static entries

It's weird because it's working fine here, my static entries are working and I use doh ... (I'm using 6.48, but didn't notice a problem before).
by Florian
Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:54 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Usage GPON module SFP in Spain
Replies: 629
Views: 349825

Re: Usage GPON module SFP in Spain

So it's limited at 1g ? In France (and i guess others countries too) Orange, SFR, Bouygues, offer more than 1gb now, still on gpon tech.
by Florian
Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:59 am
Forum: General
Topic: S+RJ10 auto-neg problem/question
Replies: 1
Views: 605

S+RJ10 auto-neg problem/question

Hello there, I've a CCR1036-8G-2S+ , and a S+RJ10 (recent, manufacturing date 20-04-20), and I believed the module supports 2.5g and 5g (and 10g of course) ? But when I type /interface ethernet> set advertise=2500M-full sfp-sfpplus2 , the gui in winbox is showing 2.5g, but the neg with a remote equi...
by Florian
Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:53 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.48beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 184
Views: 114206

Re: v6.48beta [testing] is released!

"*) dns - added IPv6 support for DoH;"


Not sure this is working ? The DoH server I'm using is https://doh.opendns.com/dns-query , and I see requests to 146.112.41.2 , but none to 2620:119:fc::2
by Florian
Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:34 am
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

Another v7 beta without improvement for ipv6 speed : /
by Florian
Sun Aug 16, 2020 2:01 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 167
Views: 83747

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Oh man that screenshot... Can't wait ! Good luck with the v7 development !
by Florian
Sun Aug 09, 2020 11:20 am
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

Maybe with futur Ros v7 ?
by Florian
Tue Jul 14, 2020 8:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

No news on that front I guess ?
by Florian
Thu Jun 04, 2020 8:59 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.0beta8 [development] is released!
Replies: 178
Views: 91948

Re: v7.0beta8 [development] is released!

Can't believe my eyes. L3 HW offloading and Linux kernel v5.6.3, what a jump from v4.14. What's next, WireGuard and HW NAT? :) You're amazing, guys! Gonna play around with spare RB3011 to test everything. IPv6 fasttrack/path (or any form of faster ipv6) would be nice :D But it's already a big step ...
by Florian
Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:36 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 269
Views: 179147

Re: v6.47beta [testing] is released!

Hello, Would it be possible for dns / doh to use ipv6 too ? I mean, I've dns.google for doh. The name resolution is giving me 4 addresses, 2 v4 , and 2 v6. But if I monitor the connections, the dns requests are only sent to 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 , the ipv6 ones are not used. My ISP has different routi...
by Florian
Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:29 am
Forum: General
Topic: ccr1036-8g-2s+ high CPU temperature [SOLVED]
Replies: 7
Views: 8254

Re: ccr1036-8g-2s+ high CPU temperature [SOLVED]

If it is a gen1 (one 24v psu), most of the heat come from the psu, with the air trapped inside. On mine I just opened it, and lose like 10-15 degrees.
by Florian
Wed Apr 01, 2020 9:15 am
Forum: General
Topic: IPv6 offload needed
Replies: 4
Views: 3219

Re: IPv6 offload needed

It's been asked for years.

I guess it needs a lot of work under the hood to accelerate the ipv6 flow.
by Florian
Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:51 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

Maybe in v7 ? With a ccr1036, I hit approx 2gb/sec per connection, while I can hit more than 9gb/s with ipv4 and fastrack. Of course, if you multiply the connections, you can be at full speed overall, but, it's not ideal. unfortunately it seems impossible for now. they said that they should add rou...
by Florian
Sat Mar 21, 2020 5:57 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 269
Views: 179147

Re: v6.47beta [testing] is released!

Seems there are some errors with DoH, I've this sometime in the logs : DoH max queue size reached, dropping query
@Florian : same here. couldnt get it to work stable.

Despite the "max queue size reached", it's working well (I'm using opendns doh servers) here.
by Florian
Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:52 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 269
Views: 179147

Re: v6.47beta [testing] is released!

Seems there are some errors with DoH, I've this sometime in the logs : DoH max queue size reached, dropping query
by Florian
Fri Mar 20, 2020 8:50 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 269
Views: 179147

Re: v6.47beta [testing] is released!

As others are saying. The router does not know what dns.nextdns.io is. Add at least a single regular DNS server which will be used for DoH servers name resolving. Adding a static DNS entry should also suffice. Are DoH servers prioritized? When does it fall back to regular dns servers? Oh, and is it...
by Florian
Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:46 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.46.3 [stable] is released!
Replies: 28
Views: 51870

Re: v6.46.3 [stable] is released!

Does this include all the 6.47 test version fixes, since it's newer ?

Thx.
by Florian
Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

Maybe in v7 ?

With a ccr1036, I hit approx 2gb/sec per connection, while I can hit more than 9gb/s with ipv4 and fastrack. Of course, if you multiply the connections, you can be at full speed overall, but, it's not ideal.
by Florian
Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)
Replies: 203
Views: 100708

Re: RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)

Soooo, we can't disable undividual package with V7 ?

Because if not, I hope the ipv6 / duid bug, where it's needed to disable the dhcp package before changing the mac adress (viewtopic.php?f=2&t=120801&p=699787#p699787) is fixed.
by Florian
Wed Aug 21, 2019 5:18 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR1036 memory upgrade question
Replies: 31
Views: 23235

Re: CCR1036 memory upgrade question

How can i find out if i have a new(no slots) or an old(slotted) version? Specifically of the CCR1036-12G-2S+ @xt22 Do you have a picture of the new revision board open? I believe the "new" revision are the ones with 2 psu. The "old" model have only 1 psu (which at one point were...
by Florian
Tue Aug 20, 2019 11:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances
Replies: 7
Views: 2882

Re: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances

Well, with only 2 interfaces used on my ccr right now, the 9 cores are used... My guess is, for the the os, it won't matter, it will still spread the connections / session across cores. I could already test this, in 1gb. But if it doesn't, it would mean that router on a stick is non doable performan...
by Florian
Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances
Replies: 7
Views: 2882

Re: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances

Thx again :)

About the 10gb part, I don't find the post anymore but someone tested the 10gb ccr1009, and when fast track /path was active it was good. Or good enough anyway. I have a fes firewall ans nat rules, but not hundreds... And if vlan interface can do fastpath too, I'll be alright I guess.
by Florian
Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances
Replies: 7
Views: 2882

Re: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances

Thx you for this answer : ) I read a lot about bridge, but it seems that if you mess it up you can lose a lot of performances. With vlan interfaces directly attached to a ether interface, I guess that fastpath and all that is still working ? I read some situation where as soon as they enable vlan in...
by Florian
Tue Aug 20, 2019 5:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances
Replies: 7
Views: 2882

Question about CCR and inter-vlan routing performances

Hello, On CCR routers, let say CCR 1009 without switch chip, if I create 2 vlans, and assign them to physical interfaces (vlan2=>ether2 ; vlan3=>ether3), and using the vlans interfaces for my firewall rules, routing, nat, etc, will the speed be the same that if I'm using directly the physical interf...
by Florian
Sun Aug 18, 2019 3:04 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?
Replies: 10
Views: 4925

Re: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?

Hello again. I'm thinking more and more about this since in France the isp Free is pushing 10gb (well, 8) in some areas. What I don't understand about router on a stick is the bandwith impact. Port are full duplex nowadays, so, If i launch a download and can get 10gb/s... wan-vlan=>10gb router port ...
by Florian
Sun Jul 14, 2019 9:07 pm
Forum: General
Topic: No layer7-protocol on ipv6?
Replies: 1
Views: 1314

Re: No layer7-protocol on ipv6?

i have to up this.

It's very useful to to conditional DNS...
by Florian
Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:32 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack
Replies: 39
Views: 16232

Re: [Feature Request] IPv6 Fasttrack

+1

There is not NAT situation anymore with IPv6 (well.... mostly), but a boost in perf could be nice, with IPv6 being the futur and more and more used.
by Florian
Sat Jun 15, 2019 7:29 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.45beta [testing] is released!
Replies: 304
Views: 156650

Re: v6.45beta [testing] is released!

Please implement "advertise-local-dns" option in IPv6 ND that makes router advertise the local address (same as gateway) as DNS server, instead of the IPv6 DNS servers configured in /ip dns. (to make IPv6 systems use the local DNS resolver instead of going directly to the ISP DNS servers)...
by Florian
Thu Apr 18, 2019 3:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Dstnat in output chain? [SOLVED]
Replies: 23
Views: 12688

Re: Dstnat in output chain? [SOLVED]

If this was added, I'd also use it for per-domain DNS forwarding in few places, because it would help with at least some shortcomings of current L7 hack (bypassing cache and not working for router itself). But I really hope to live to see proper support for that in RouterOS DNS resolver. +1, for th...
by Florian
Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:58 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?
Replies: 10
Views: 4925

Re: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?

Router on a stick works well and many SoHo routers works by this way internally. I also don't know how a residential customer could saturate 10GbE internet link. Saturating 1gb is pretty easy in my case. Now, 10gb, I don't know, it would depend of the servers I'm using, the peering quality of my is...
by Florian
Thu Dec 27, 2018 10:30 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?
Replies: 10
Views: 4925

Re: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?

Switch: Port 1 = WAN - PVID 100 (so access port on vlan 100) Port 2 = LAN - PVID 200 (access port on vlan 200) Port 3 or 4 = Router, Trunk port with tagged 100 and 200 VLAN Making sure bridge vlan filter is on to ensure adherence to the tags and PVID. On Router you have 1 physical interface, you cr...
by Florian
Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:51 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?
Replies: 10
Views: 4925

Re: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?

He is suggesting to make an "router on a stick". With the use of VLANs, and a smart switch, You can use the same 10Gb port to WAN and LAN. But, with this setup, you can't use the full 10Gb - since we would have two streams using the same port. With residential usage I don't think it would...
by Florian
Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:13 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?
Replies: 10
Views: 4925

Re: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?

You could use a cheap switch like Mikrotik's little 4 port SFP+ switch for WAN, LAN, Router So WAN comes into switch, switch goes into router, router back to switch for output via LAN port. Or you could upgrade to the likes of CCR1036-8G-2S+ but thats quite a bit expensive. But in this case, I stil...
by Florian
Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:31 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: 2*10gb ports for a CCR ?
Replies: 10
Views: 4925

2*10gb ports for a CCR ?

Hello, Some ISPs are looking at testing 10gb ftth in 2019/2020. Right now, I've a 1gb connex., which is working great with my CCR1009-7G-1C-PC. But in the futur, I will need a 10gb port. Even 2 (1 wan, 1 lan). So, the CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+PC looked good with the sfp+ cage, until I notice that It's the o...
by Florian
Sun Nov 25, 2018 2:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?
Replies: 18
Views: 10822

Re: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?

Yeah, it's pretty bad... It's strange, some problems they fix in a few RC releases, and other are not fixed for years... In my mind, I really hope it's because RoS6 is a "mess" to work with, and V7 will be more flexible and a lot of bugs will be fixed by it... But I'm 35, I wonder If I'll ...
by Florian
Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:45 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?
Replies: 18
Views: 10822

Re: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?

Alright, so I did a reset configuration, then change the ether1 mac address, the create a dhcp6 client, and still, it's the original mac from ether1 who is used for the duid. The factory reset isn't working anymore ? Thx in advance. Edit : ok, I had to disable dhcp and IPv6 package, reboot, reset co...
by Florian
Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:25 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?
Replies: 18
Views: 10822

Re: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?

Can we at least have the option to reset the duid, from a chosen eth interface, without having to factory reset the whole thing, please ?
by Florian
Wed Oct 31, 2018 6:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?
Replies: 18
Views: 10822

Re: DHCPv6 DUID change - bug?

Any news on this ? SFR, a french ISP, need a specific DUID. I don't want to factory reset my router, then change the mac adress (of eth1 since RoS seems to use this one event if it's not connected...), and then enable ipv6, only for that... A simple duid variable in the dhcpv6 client would do the tr...
by Florian
Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:08 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.43rc [release candidate] is released!
Replies: 557
Views: 221412

Re: v6.43rc [release candidate] is released!

Hello,

Funny thing after Version 6.43rc56 , my DHCPv6 client is showing in red in winbox, even though everything is working, and my ipv6 connectivity is ok. Still after after re-creating it from scratch... Not a big deal, but...
ipv6.JPG
by Florian
Fri Jun 01, 2018 2:50 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 255314

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

To be fair, some of "wait for v7" problems were in fact corrected in v6.XX (like more options for DHCPv6 Server) My theory is that they didn't plan to push v6 this far, and they realised that SOME of v7 features could be in fact in v6, so this "helped" delay V7. Now, Mikrotik is ...
by Florian
Sun May 27, 2018 2:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request / Improvement : Fastpath/track and bridges
Replies: 0
Views: 917

Feature Request / Improvement : Fastpath/track and bridges

Hi. It seems release after release you improve on that, but, is there any chance that fastpath/track on bridge can be improved ? And by that I mean working even if we have rules in /interface bridge filter ? In my case, I have just 2 rules here, to change priority on dhcp request (my isp require tha...
by Florian
Sat May 26, 2018 8:22 pm
Forum: General
Topic: IPv6 Neighbor List : Status : failed
Replies: 1
Views: 2028

IPv6 Neighbor List : Status : failed

Hi there. I've a strange problem that I don't really understand. My IPv6 setup works for a few minutes, and then, at the next ND I suppose, the physical interface with the ipv6 connection goes to "failed" in the Neighbor List. If I disable/enable , it's working again for a few minutes, and...
by Florian
Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:21 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!
Replies: 537
Views: 188450

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

So, if we are under r20 and don't want to "clean flash", we're screwed and can't upgrade, right ?
by Florian
Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature requests
Replies: 1739
Views: 624717

Re: Feature requests

I guess so, but, It's to show the devs my (or "ours") interest in this, if they can find a way to implement it, some people would be very happy.
by Florian
Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature requests
Replies: 1739
Views: 624717

Re: Feature requests

I know it's not ready yet, but +1 on Wireguard. You know how everyone's always saying "we want UDP support in OpenVPN" and "we want LZO"? And MikroTik say that their OVPN implementation is really nasty code that's hard to work on? How about instead we look to the future: WireGuar...
by Florian
Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:03 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request - DNSCrypt support...
Replies: 173
Views: 80707

Re: Feature request - DNSCrypt support...

+1.
by Florian
Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DNS server stop working from time to time
Replies: 8
Views: 5159

Re: DNS server stop working from time to time

I do. But I found the "true" problem in my case. I mailed them this : (sorry for my bad english) "Additional info : In fact, it seems that Mikrotik sometime doesn't try all the dns servers in the list, but only the last one. And if the last one is down, then, it doesn't try the first ...
by Florian
Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DNS server stop working from time to time
Replies: 8
Views: 5159

Re: DNS server stop working from time to time

Yeah, I did it yesterday :) Thx :)
by Florian
Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:58 am
Forum: General
Topic: DNS server stop working from time to time
Replies: 8
Views: 5159

Re: DNS server stop working from time to time

Hi.

Ok, what is the "official" way to submit a bug report ? I can't seem to find it, sorry :/

Thx.
by Florian
Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:09 am
Forum: General
Topic: DNS server stop working from time to time
Replies: 8
Views: 5159

DNS server stop working from time to time

Hello, I've a strange problem with the Mikrotik DNS server of my CCR 1009. The setup is pretty classic : [admin@MikroTik] > /ip dns print servers: 80.67.169.12,8.8.8.8 dynamic-servers: allow-remote-requests: yes max-udp-packet-size: 4096 query-server-timeout: 2s query-total-timeout: 4s max-concurren...
by Florian
Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request: DHCPv6-client Options
Replies: 1
Views: 1286

Re: Feature request: DHCPv6-client Options

Hi,

They told us before that all that will be included in RouterOS v7. Now, when RouterOS v7 will be available, it's another question :)
by Florian
Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request for v7.x
Replies: 296
Views: 106604

Re: Feature request for v7.x

Hi ! I would love a equivalent of "llprio" found in OpenBSD6. "In ifconfig, add the "llprio" parameter to set the priority of packets that do not go through pf." I believe it would be a way to interact with raw sockets packets. (In my own case, I need to put priority on...
by Florian
Sat Nov 05, 2016 6:03 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 PD not working
Replies: 11
Views: 5481

Re: DHCPv6 PD not working

If I remember correctly, they said it will be in RouterOS v7.
by Florian
Tue May 03, 2016 4:41 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets

I hope the DHCP will use "ip" and not raw sockets in V7... or that the v7 will be able to work with raw socket... "The real need is to be able to mark outgoing DHCP client packets with a DSCP value. The reason stays the same, the isp Orange need it to answer DHCP requests. And then, s...
by Florian
Thu Apr 14, 2016 1:45 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!
Replies: 536
Views: 177100

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

regarding options for DHCPv6-client, DHCP-PD client (and also DHCP--PD server) as it currently stands - options will be available only with RouterOS 7.x release due to technical limitations for backporting the feature.

Thx for the update :)

The famous RouterOS7.x.... I'll have to wait I guess :)
by Florian
Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:33 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!
Replies: 536
Views: 177100

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

Version 6.35rc49 has been released. Changes since previous version: *) dhcpv6 client - fix ia expiration and lifetime validation; *) dhcpv6 server - acquire binding on renew if it does not exist; I see a lot of works on dhcpv6 in recents RCs, which is a good thing. Any timeline about adding options...
by Florian
Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:30 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!
Replies: 536
Views: 177100

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

Everyone who is still experiencing issues with upgrade/downgrade. In version 6.35rc46 we introduced fix: *) nand - fixed reboot loop after upgrade to >v6.35rc43; This fixed reboot loop, but you have to remember that within upgrade you can not have rc43-rc45 version involved. For example, upgrade fr...
by Florian
Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:06 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!
Replies: 536
Views: 177100

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

Everyone who is still experiencing issues with upgrade/downgrade. In version 6.35rc46 we introduced fix: *) nand - fixed reboot loop after upgrade to >v6.35rc43; This fixed reboot loop, but you have to remember that within upgrade you can not have rc43-rc45 version involved. For example, upgrade fr...
by Florian
Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:02 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!
Replies: 536
Views: 177100

Re: v6.35rc [release candidate] is released, new wireless package!

I'm staying on rc43, rc45 seems risky...
by Florian
Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets

I would suggest that, at the same time that you try to convince MikroTik that they should support this DSCP setting, you try to convince your ISP that they should not perform needless checking. Fine if they give out modems that send DHCP at higher priority, but why would you check in the server tha...
by Florian
Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets

Some *nix dhcp clients work at the ip level, not raw socket level. It could be one solution if I'm not mistaken.
by Florian
Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets

- I corrected the first post and the subject -
by Florian
Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : CoS on DHCP packets

Well I really hope it will be implemented somehow. For now I switched to PPPoE, but there is some overhead, and, soon Orange will only allow DHCP and I'll be screwed...
by Florian
Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:56 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : CoS on DHCP packets

generally its much better to make ISP respect standards instead. relying on 802.1x-2010 instead, for example(and MacSec, PortSec and other stuff in it), instead. I agree, but they are the number one ISP in France so they sort of do what they want :D But anyway, other *nux/nix based solution have a ...
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : CoS on DHCP packets

Still, solutions exists in other products :) The solution for EdgeOS was done by a amateur who has a Orange access too, he compiled the new dhclient himself...
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:58 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???
Replies: 36
Views: 16421

Re: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???

Does the CCR have a hardware switch on it? (too lazy and braindead today to go look at the product flier on routerboard.com) If so, there's an option in the HW switch to twiddle things, including the Dot1P priority value - my 2011 has settings for this, and perhaps this would be the best way to do ...
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Re: Feature Request : CoS on DHCP packets

For the record, an ERL user (Ubiquity / EdgeOS) patched the open source dhclient by adding this 2 lines :

int val = 6;
setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PRIORITY, &val, sizeof (val));


(sock being used by raw sockets)

I know RouteurOS is different, but...
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???
Replies: 36
Views: 16421

Re: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???

Thx, I just tried, but the bridge filter rule does nothing, the counters stay at 0. For the sake of it I tried to change to out-interface to vlan832-orange, same thing. Try in-bridge instead of out-bridge or just leaving no bridge specified? Also - you might grab a quick paket sniffer capture to di...
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets
Replies: 19
Views: 8952

Feature Request : DSCP on DHCP packets

EDIT : I was wrong in the following post. The real need is to be able to mark outgoing DHCP client packets with a DSCP value. The reason stays the same, the isp Orange need it to answer DHCP requests. And then, since Orange use a VLAN, we need a DSCP=>CoS mapping which would work for dhcp packets go...
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature requests
Replies: 1739
Views: 624717

Re: Feature requests

Hi.

Is this topic still read by the devs ?
by Florian
Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:13 am
Forum: General
Topic: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???
Replies: 36
Views: 16421

Re: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???

make a bridge called WAN /interface bridge add name=WAN connect the ether8 interface to it: /interface bridge port add interface=ether8 bridge=WAN move the vlan interface off of ether8 and onto the WAN bridge /interface vlan set [find where name=vlan832-orange] interface=WAN Then make a bridge filt...
by Florian
Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???
Replies: 36
Views: 16421

Re: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???

My ccr is a dhcp client in that situation. And your solution doesn't work from what I understand, because the dhcp request is a raw socket thing, and doesn't enter in the firewall stack. Actually, you're comparing apples and oranges. This thread is about blocking inbound DHCP request frames from re...
by Florian
Tue Mar 22, 2016 11:10 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???
Replies: 36
Views: 16421

Re: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???

Hello there, Any news on that ? My ISP need to receive DHCP Request with a priority of 6. In the current state, I can't "manipulate" the dhcp packet with the firewall "stack", so, no connexion... my crr 1009 is a 400 euros paper weight right now :/ Is this for your CCR to be a d...
by Florian
Tue Mar 22, 2016 9:56 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???
Replies: 36
Views: 16421

Re: Impossible to block DHCP Server. By design, or bug???

That's great to know that the bridge firewall can intercept those packets! You are right, I was using the IP Firewall option, not the Bridge Firewall. As for the raw versus ip option, I put in a feature request and support said "not currently, but probably in the future ". Hello there, An...
by Florian
Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Prioritizing DHCP
Replies: 4
Views: 2981

Re: Prioritizing DHCP

Hi,

I need to have a Cos of 6 on the DHCP Request emitted by one of my vlan interface.

The last post is the way to do it ? ie creating a bridge and put the CoS there ? (since dhcp bypass the firewall brick ?)

Thx.
by Florian
Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:28 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP, Raw Socket, and priority
Replies: 0
Views: 993

DHCP, Raw Socket, and priority

Hello there, My ISP need a CoS of 6 on the DHCP packet. But as far as I know, you can't force that in the dhcp client options of RouteurOS. And, if I create a mangle queue, it doesn't work either because the raw socket don't "enter" the firewall module, right ? So, is there a solution for ...
by Florian
Sun Mar 20, 2016 12:27 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Nat / in-interface / ethernet or vlan interface ?
Replies: 4
Views: 1497

Re: Nat / in-interface / ethernet or vlan interface ?

Well, in my mind, I thought the both would work, since physically it still come in by "ether8". I guess I was wrong :D
by Florian
Sun Mar 20, 2016 12:00 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Nat / in-interface / ethernet or vlan interface ?
Replies: 4
Views: 1497

Nat / in-interface / ethernet or vlan interface ?

Hello there. Sorry for the subject title, it's not very clear. I've a question about the "logic" of vlan interface and nat rules. I explain, I added a vlan interface on a "physical" interface (let say I added a vlan832 on the ehter 8 interface : /interface vlan add interface=ethe...
by Florian
Tue Mar 15, 2016 11:35 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR 1009 switch chip menu
Replies: 22
Views: 13104

Re: CCR 1009 switch chip menu

That was my main problem, because I read that switch port used more cpu than "cpu port". I have read that a few times as well, but could never reliably reproduce it in lab tests on both RB1100AHx2 and CCR1009-PC. If there is a difference, it is so minor it barely makes an impact. you are ...
by Florian
Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:07 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR 1009 switch chip menu
Replies: 22
Views: 13104

Re: CCR 1009 switch chip menu

... Other than the switch-group ports sharing 1 gbps full-duplex towards the CPU, Routing/NATing etc. to a port in a switch-group is not slower than it is on any other port. That was my main problem, because I read that switch port used more cpu than "cpu port". But if it's wrong, great, ...
by Florian
Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:02 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR 1009 switch chip menu
Replies: 22
Views: 13104

Re: CCR 1009 switch chip menu

Thx a lot for the explanation and instructions. Without even using the bridge method, I'm still "afraid" of performances problems if I firewall/nat to a switched port. I've a 1gb/sec fiber connexion, would like to use fastpath, fasttrack&stuff. So, I guess I'll just put a switch I alre...
by Florian
Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:01 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CCR 1009 switch chip menu
Replies: 22
Views: 13104

Re: CCR 1009 switch chip menu

Hello there, and sorry for posting in this old topic. Sorry for my bad english too, it's not my native language . I'll receive my CCR 1009 soon, and I don't get something about the swtich chip / switch ports. My CCR will replace and ISP box, home usage. My wan will be on port 8 , and my LAN on port ...
by Florian
Sun Mar 13, 2016 9:48 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 PD not working
Replies: 11
Views: 5481

Re: DHCPv6 PD not working

Yes, Orange needs DHCPv6 options.

I hope we will have them soon :D