Please keep this forum topic strictly related to this particular RouterOS release.
We have relatives there, and taking my mom to visit this summer. They wanted me to "fix their wi-fi" while visiting & thinking how to outsourceCurious why you asked...
Fixed for me. Thanks.*) fix RoMON connect (introduced in v4.0beta19)
That sounds like good news!Very close to final version.
Any updates?
"Sir, I see some movement on the enemy's trench."
/system/history/print detail
Well when the release mgmt discussions start to overwhelming the "testing" thread... the "process" is that beta becomes a rc ;).this will be for sure going in circles for eternity
/routing/nexthop print
/routing/routes print
So what is the summary on why RoMON does not work here? I lost track of the conversation.Well based on the avatar, I guess that post could be considered a dud!)
Fixed. I swear I'd seen that cause not RoMON work in past. But re-tested it, you're right.My post intentionally refers to @Ammo's one in particular, just for the case that someone comes searching and gets mislead by it. But unless @Ammo edits his, few people will probably notice mine.
Sure, but that's what HAProxy is for...Normis said the problem is the forum software doesn't support HA and/or distributing the site between several servers. Do with this info what You will.
Is there any way you can publish a ZIP of the forum content when you migrate it? I still think it interesting try the forum content in some small language model.posts will be migrated
While :nothing is nothing... [:nothing] is nil:Is not clear at all on post #2: not mix nil and nothing, because nothing is also different from nothing.
:put [:typeof [:nothing]]
nil
:put ([:typeof [:find "asd" "p" -1]]="nil")
:put ([:find "asd" "p" -1] = [:nothing])
Maybe if it multiple lines you need a {} code block, since the [] is not a codeblockBut alas.
/ip/arp/find [{
:put $address
:put $interface
}]
* assuming you're not in North America+1 for ATL LTE18.
That make sense, given they've long implemented the now ratified RFC-9759It might actually happen sooner than you'd expect. Word is Mikrotik has recently brought on about 15 people, supposedly working full-time on developing business-oriented features.
no plan to make it avoidable while still keeping the device up to date. This is my main complaint.
True in part. But there is no context menu (right-click) with "Copy", and in WinBox4 the "copy" being in the title bar (i.e. stacked paper icon is copy) may not be obvious to all...Not sure why you think it is missing.
Maybe. No point arguing here. Open a new ticket with the exact problem you're see... since, yes, sometime it does take a few rounds in a ticket to convince them. But they do fix something if there is clear repo case in a ticket.As was said, it's a RouterOS bug.
LOL. When I saw the release note, I thought of you and this thread "guess rex' is right"Well, I see I was right...
Yeah that's kinda my question. I wouldn't have spend 1+ hour testing if there was SOME clue it was "experimental"/"for testing"/etcRhetorical question, of course this could be tested beforehand.
Nope.any reply from mk?
I wrote down some basic steps here too, which include a BASIC initial example of using file-share.If not, then maybe I have to upload screenshots step by step of it.
/interface/wireguard/peers/show-client-config [find]
@anav identifies with interfaces. Let's not judge.Jealous?Now you guys are just showing off with json commands and DHCP codes LOL, Too much for us less trained, but must be sexy talk to you guys LOL