One note, in scheduler script, you might want to use "/log info TEXT" instead of a :put.@Amm0 thanks will give that a shot.
Perhaps, but it's "brother" with miniPCIe is marked as discontinued (https://mikrotik.com/product/wap_r_ac)wAP ac is not discontinued
Given we're at an icon flashing in task bar: https://youtu.be/sQPlwDSd5LM?t=184 — be a while.@normis any update on a native mac app for winbox?
Well, they should have a status page. I'd suggest Dude and function to update the web siteAgree. Or perhaps some backup host someplace else for geo-redundancy. Not asking 5-nines here.Why on the forum?
They should have a services status on the main website.
LOL. I don't think @DarkNate was even trying to troll [here] – just a lucky guess. If so, you have some eggs from your pizza to throw at him.Seriously?
Good to hear.First bet is DNS.
Think y'all selling yourselves short. And docs themselves do get updated regularly.there are not so many new features during these revisions.
If you know Linux/UNIX, the [] are similar to `` backtick to run a command and replace result in-place.I didn't even think about the use (), i'm kind new to scripting, thanks for the hint!
So sanitize means remove spaces and special characters. The reverted this as a default in 7.15 beta.*) console - replace reserved characters in file and script names with underscores;
Ask and answered below . So EoIP + WG with RoMON is discussed here:What if you wanted to do EoIP on top of wireguard and add RoMON?
It is possible China changed its policy recently. AFAIK, Mikrotik uses the same subnet for BTH as everything else.Dont feed the trolls.
But this forum works?I think so, but ping is OK, http and https can’t be accessed.I think that the question is: Does China blocked Mikrotik's site?
Which is okay, you're really just using it for management. But all encryption has to flow through the CPU anyway.Note that when I added an ipsec key, I was forced to turn off "Allow Fast Path"
/ip routeSorry, I don't know what you meanThat's why you're getting a command error. Now is routing "mark" in the firewall, it a "table" routes.
To @anav's point, your problem is not the same. IPSec isn't mentions at all here & that add more complexity.I have exactly the same problem as Chaosphere64. [...] IPSec Lan2Lan connection [...] How can I solve this problem?