Yup.Some kind of warning/reminder would be appropriate.
/system/note/set note="Using free license, speed limited to 1Mb/s"
My guess: the additional heat from SFPs requires fan/more complex cooling. See CRS304 (plastic) vs CRS305 (metal).Why no SFP+ port (or two)?
Gotcha. Well, then it's getting it off the roof/tower to reset it one way or another.As I said, I use only SSH to connect to any of the routers and all other methods were intentionally disabled for security reasons.
What partitioning is used on the usb2-part1? If it's FAT you'd want to keep the names shorter. And if FAT, maybe use an ext4 partition.I just try this example and does't seem to work... i just use: "usb2-part1/debian/container1"
For some weird reason the alpine image works...
See viewtopic.php?t=211251Without any concrete needs/use, are all useless.
OS / version give more clues... Did it work in previous beta before?i have an issue with winbox 4vb8... i can not start winbox. I see it in the processes but the windows of winbox is not starting.. any hints/tipps?
Well... the VPN does need to support multicast & that's the limiting factor to repeating mDNS. I don't think L2TP work with new mDNS proxy. So off top of my head, that be GRE+IPSec, EoIP+IPSec and ZeroTier - that should work with new mDNS repeater.I'll try with another VPN...
While it got the wine... but c'mon, dutch impressionist art. And two door handles, although you are a security conscience guy. Always something wrong with these LLMs .It is made with artificial intelligence, since at least in this case imagination is useful...
Sure, just copy the existing profile used by SSTP (likely default-encyrption) and create a new one under PPP Profiles.Actaully I can't also create a second SSTP server wit a static destination only, specified on another profile. How can I run SSTP server with different profiles?
True. Specifically, this chart:
Yup. FWIW, the docs on how this works are lacking . My guess it operates a "matcher"/selector, not like the firewall "filter"/etc - or at least that how I rationalize the logic here.... really wierd...
Yup. I'd look at the CPU usage on the Proxmox host, if CPU is low there, but CHR is high... you should increase the CPU cores assigned to CHR. Or perhaps memory too.Which again points at CHR itself rather than at virtualization platform.