LOL. When I saw the release note, I thought of you and this thread "guess rex' is right"Well, I see I was right...
Yeah that's kinda my question. I wouldn't have spend 1+ hour testing if there was SOME clue it was "experimental"/"for testing"/etcRhetorical question, of course this could be tested beforehand.
Nope.any reply from mk?
I wrote down some basic steps here too, which include a BASIC initial example of using file-share.If not, then maybe I have to upload screenshots step by step of it.
/interface/wireguard/peers/show-client-config [find]
@anav identifies with interfaces. Let's not judge.Jealous?Now you guys are just showing off with json commands and DHCP codes LOL, Too much for us less trained, but must be sexy talk to you guys LOL
But one could say same about pixels sizes... It's sloppy, and shows lack of build process that would set that. Now priority, IDK.What difference does it make?
@Mikrotik, Is there a list of modems modules that the eSIM feature works on?I really like the eSIM support and works great,
But some unique "log id" has long been missing... so hope that is part is included.More CEF features are in development for the next betas
"We're going the taking shit about device-mode forever - don't blame me"Attempt5: " Damn, I forgot the keys in the car! "
Attempt6: " I wonder if these glasses make me look smarter? "
My guess is that webfig717+/winbox4 being "done" is the gating item there, I'd imagine they'll re-use those UI components, but those aren't done given the Winbox4 beta threadCould it be related to the MikroTik Devices Controller ?
We could only hope. Or, just add Dude features into winbox4.Maybe, an overhaul of Dude is the new controller.
Easy to confuse, we're all one country over here now.Where is???@anav