Installed 6.49.11 and its boot firmware on RB 3011, 2011, hAP ac and multiple RB750's - Everything works fine. Curious about what exactly improved about the poe-out port. Does it specifically address the problem related to low voltage passthrough that can blow the port out ?

Thanks for the comments guys. Indeed the ISP side had it accidently blocked. Problem has been resolved and it was definitely not the RouterOS.

Open resolvers on port 53 are often abused for DDoS reflection attacks, your ISP or another upstream is probably filtering it. I've thought so too. I'm testing from within the ISP network using the same subnet. Client / server connection not working with the MikroTik. But I can query another IP in ...

Why would anyone open up port 53 on the input chain or portforward port 53 to the LAN side......... Sounds like security breach to me........ In other words your firewall rules are not worthy of commenting upon and port 53 is the least of your problems. Fixed for you........ /ip firewall filter {In...

For starters, push those 2 rules with action=log above similar rules with action=accept. Firewall rules are evaluated top-to-bottom and first matching rule executes. Rules with action=accept or action=drop also stop processing of rules. So the way you have them now, the log rules will not execute f...

Confusing post. Forgetting about the config, What are your requirements, based on users, traffiic flow they need to have or not to have with respect to DNS. A viable solution will pop out from well stated requirements. The only issue here is that you dont understand how DNS works or ROS works or bo...

Change the in-interface to "pppoe-out1" ? I made the suggested change, counters still at 0 when I tried with putty using telnet to port 53: # jan/10/2023 15:13:32 by RouterOS 7.6 # software id = 7***-**** # # model = RB750 # serial number = 2F********** /interface pppoe-client add add-def...

Hello, If anyone can help please do. Several mikrotik routers I manage can't seem to get a socket connection to port 53. The production application would be a DNS server behind NAT where the WAN connection is the PPPoE interface. ( but I haven't got that far because of this problem ) I tried to setu...

Certainly not in the long-term channel. I've already paid mikrotik for the hardware. I come here in this release channel to actually make it work like advertised. There may be an opportunity for MT here to provide paid access (subscription or per-release) to some kind of ultra-stable channel with se...

Are you for real with a comment like that? This is the LONG TERM channel - Mikrotik's most stable release channel. Doesn't matter the reasons for upgrading. One should expect from one release to the next that their device won't brick in this release channel. Completely unacceptable, don't go blaming...

Bricked means the device interfaces no longer works as intended by the manufacturer. Unable to use the reset button and power cycle functions to gain access to the device means BRICKED. Going from one Long-Term (6.47.10) to the NEXT Long-Term(6.48.5) release should not equate to getting a bricked de...

RB3011 6.47.10 to 6.48.5 RouterOS installed ok.
Reboot
update bootloader from 6.47.10 to 6.48.5 and Brick.

Now I just have Etherboot sitting on my LCD. Not happy -_-

Anyone else using RB 3011 on 6.44.6 that shows the wrong link up time? Viewing the router through winbox ver 3.18 - 3.20 on Windows 7 and windows 10 computers. Viewing Last link up times on the Ethernet interfaces and even the PPPoE client interface shows link up times of the future. Right now its s...

I've read it. I see what I use shouldn't be affected. But its quite a jump, considering the changes to switch and bridge. Just wondering if anyone else made such a jump. In the past I've gone from 4.x to 6.x and that wasn't an issue. But so much has changed. I don't need any new features, but I can'...

Hello ! I left a bunch of RB's on 6.40.9 but the latest CVE's no longer make that suitable for internet traffic. Is there any concerns making the jump to 6.44.5 ? Other then changes to bridge and password storage method. My hope is to just press the Download&Install button remotely so I don't ha...

Just noticed on this version that RB3011 display screen no longer scrolls during bandwidth monitor. Has anyone else had touch screen issue where its locked up on 6.40.9 ? It was working in earlier versions of 6.40.x

3011 and RB750 with MLPPPoE upgraded fine from 6.40.8

Normis, Is it also true to say that using net install with any version will also remove the bad files? Obviously reinfection is possible below 6.38.5, but files that were mentioned from the console output with special npk package, would those be removed using net install specifically ? How to detect...

Just upgraded RB750 and RB3011 from 6.40.5 - MLPPP still working good.

After testing with RB750 and RB3011, the upgrades are ok, but going from 6.39 to 6.40.5 reveals a problem on MLPPP. I'm using 2 DSL modems. If one of the modems loses its physical layer, such as loss of power or loss of ADSL sync, the MLPPPoE bundle gets confused and does not bring the link down to ...

That's a pretty smart idea. I actually started with an RB2011, and then maxed out the CPU with my needs and got a RB3011RM, great router! Everyone's needs are different, however depending on your setup, you could put the WAN connection on 2011 and connect just the servers to run off it ( Git server,...

I agree with everyone's comments here. But possibly there may be one small labeling change that could stop some confusion. The current version inside the router is currently labelled as " Stable ", I think that's great, just like FreeBSD style. But we all know its not a release that works ...

This completely broke in 6.39 but fixed completely in 6.39.2:

*) ppp - fixed "change-mss" functionality (introduced in 6.39);

This was finally fixed in version 6.39.2 !

New inexpensive member to the CCR family of routers:

- five 1Gb ports
- five 10Gb ports
- four SFP+ ports
- two USB 3.0 ports

No port sharing / TILE-Gx based CPU

Is there any plans to patch the bugfix channel ( 6.37.x ) against Vault 7's "ChimayRed" exploit ? Some of my networks are not able to make the jump to current release channel.

Hey everyone, I'm hoping that someone has ran into this before. I've tried for a very long time to come up with a fix for this, but only ended up doing a work around. The setup is like this. RB750 or RB2011 as the PPPoE device for DSL. Modems are in port 3 and port 4 ( MLPPP ) Then the mikrotik subn...

Hello, I'm currently trying to migrate away from using FreeBSD as my MLPPP client for the internet connection. The problem I'm finding is that not all the websites are available with MikroTik in place. This is not an MTU problem. MTU, MRU and MRRU values have all been adjusted according to various a...