MikroTik

ice

MT Guys,
Any development on the WIMAX front?

ice

Eugene you mean, that WLAN1, WLAN2 both go into bridge, WDS static is made. Then we bond the WDS1 and WDS2. Should we also put the bond interface into the bridge? WHat about ether1 interface? Correct me please:
WLAN1, WLAN2, Ether1 and Bond1 all go into bridge!!!

ice

Is it available for RB112 also?

ice

NM is working fine for us in 2.9.17. Same performance compared to SR2. Plus NMP is better in 2.3ghz bands than SR2.
Will check 2.9.23 though, but if there was a change in the drivers, MT guys would have mentioned it. No reason to hide it i suppose.

ice

Taloot,
In older versions did u use Tx-Power-mode= card rates and tx power=25? The problem with older versions was that at default the MT driver used to take 17dBm tx power for NM-8602. So once you do the above in old versions the peformance is same as in 2.8.23

ice

I am using CDP Monitor from TALLSOFT. It works on WINDOWS XP. It doesn't show. Do you know any software which works on Windows and can scan MT. I don't want to use Neighbor Viewer for some reason.

ice

They are enables. Simultaneously checking with Neighbor viewer shows MT. But with any other CDP MONITOR software MT is not discovered. I think MT is not 100% CDP.

ice

BUT....
using CDP Monitor software we cannot scan MT.

ice

Cool!
SNMP TRAP and GET features are required.

ice

Yes this is interesting. Would appreciate to know if some one tried the transparent web cache feature.

ice

We found out. There was a block in cisco for all router access in the same lan. We configured the MT to bridge mode and now all traffic flowing through it able to ping cisco, though MT still can't ping cisco due to the block.

ice

The computers can get on the Internet but NOT THE MT.

ice

MT and cisco are on the same LAN. MT= 10.10.10.23/24 Cisco= 10.10.10.1/24 Computer= 10.10.10.4/24 Computer pings cisco MT pings computer Mt pings cisco, but after 3 pings it gets RTO, and if interface disable and enable then again 3 pings and then RTO Is the cisco blocking access from router on the ...

ice

We have a cisco router in the network, we don't know its configuration. The computers in the network use it as default gateway to go on the internet. The problem is that when we put MT on the same network(LAN) following happens: 1. MT can ping the computers in the LAN 2. Computers in the LAN can pin...

ice

Set basic to 6 only.

ice

Maybe make your unit a Brouter. Bridge all traffic except TCP. It should work then i suppose. Never tried it though.

ice

Any plans on implementing TDMoIP support in MT OS? This way we can use any G.703 E1 card and implement solutions for transferring E1 trasnsparently over wireless network. We require this to compete with RadWIn.

ice

enable NETBIOS over IP in network settings in the server and your computer

ice

This for MT Guys, any plans of implementing WIMAX, since now the minipci card is out.
http://www.wavesat.com/products/mini-pci.html

I think its time to show the big boys what is MT all about

ice

What should be mention the Tx Power as if we use 2.4Ghz-10Mhz mode?

ice

Does any one know how to DISALLOW router page from opening in browser. If we disable www in services then WINBOX also gets affected and doesn't open. We need to allow WINBOX but not browser access for security reasons.
help would be appreciated

ice

The network is like this: Cisco VLAN1 ---- VLAN1 of MT Master (meant for Slave 1) VLAN2------VLAN2 of MT Master (meant for SLave 2) WLAN1 of Master is connected SLAVE 1, which is terminated to Network 1.1.1.0/24 on ethernet WLAN2 of Master is connected SLAVE 2, which is terminated to Network 2.2.2.0...

ice

The problem is not cisco. Slave 1 when tries to ping Slave 2 it does not even need to reach the cisco, it just goes through the master MT, which is not wanted. So how to prevent slaves of each wireless interface from not able to reach slaves of other wireless interface?

ice

We have a problem, help would be apprciated: We have the following: MT Router with 2 WLAN Atheros Interface and 1 Ethernet Interface (on which VLAN1 and VLAN2 is configured). Connectivity is as follows: Cisco with VLAN1 and VLAN2 connected to MT Router. Slave MT Radios are connected to each wireless...

ice

goto firewall mangle and type the following, you would be allowed to telnet

add src-address=0.0.0.0/23 action=accept

ice

ISO image would be better, since not all WISP would like to disclose that they are using Mikrotik Equipment. They would also like to brand it according to their logos etc.

ice

hi, do you use OFFSET 1.8m or Primary Focus 1.8m?

ice

I still think it is an LOS issue, and not the cards. The only issue is that in earlier versions I think it showed correct signal or maybe refresh rate was slower. In the newer versions it shows signal as sometimes -70 and immediately later it shows -88 and then again -75 and so on. Why is this?

ice

5212 works.... i just don't get it.... where are the mt guys???????

ice

We also changed some systems to CM9 and good performance. But the problem i is in new installations since i think the 2.8.21/22 is not showing correct value of signal so tracking is not proper, which even with signal of -73 the ccq is 3 and throughput is a meagre 300Kbps max. Uldis, Normunds.... any...

ice

Uldis, John, Normunds..... is it correct.... should we try 5212? Is there some problem with 5213 driver in mt which shows not correct value of signal?

ice

We are seeing some problems in a few of our installtions. The signal is -73 but the ccq is not exceeding 3 or max 4. The tx/rx rates are fluctuation between 6/6 to 6/18 to 12/12... frequently. Is it LOS issue, if yes, then why the signal is so good. In earlier versions -73 signal meant a decent stab...

ice

In the last few days we have seen that a few of the MT routers are not accessible through Winbox. They can be accessed via Telnet/FTP normally. But when we try to access them from Winbox it shows routeros.dll not a valid windows image and missing RouterOS winbox plugins. It is happening from all our...

ice

Will RB230 work fine if use EOIP Bonding. The total data rate would not exceed 10mbps.

ice

looks good, but does MT know how to handle multicasting packets?

ice

Edgards, when do we expect final release of 2.9v

ice

what kind of load balancing would be available in the new version? Will it be possible to do load balancing with failover, when both interfaces are up load balancing happens but the moment one goes down then it does failover.

ice

we are using Yoda, for connecting PBX. The voice is fine. Fax and data modems also work over this E1. But on one link we are facing problems with data modems. The modems don't connect but the moment we switch the E1 on a regular lease line copper E1 they work perfect. Why is it so? any suggestions? ...

ice

We are using 3 links, 2 are working OK. But one has problems with data modem relay. Some echo issues also.

ice

Has anyone of you guys done E1 transfer using TDMOIP gateways?

Search found 40 matches

WIMAX

Advice wanted!

TDMoIP support in MT OS!

WIMAX Mini-PCI is out!

Winbox and www

VLAN and 2 Wireless Radio Interface Problem

2.8.22 problem in signal

sudden winbox crach in some MT routers

Some more info!

E1 over Mikrotik using TDMOIP