When someone disables that graphic... doesn't it get removed from the storage?It's does matter how you enabled stuff like graphing or dhcp leases or whatever-else needs might cleaning up.... There isn't some magic CLI to free these things once created, only netinstall will wipe them.
Yes, we can. But I agree with him: why not allow this? It must be a one liner change: In pseudo code, something like "write logs in /logs or /usb/logs?"RouterOS do support syslog so you can send any logs externally and graph everything. Look at my Mikrotik for Splunk.
At the very least make one HaP AC2b, with more storage!
it is time for MT to release stripped down "DumbAP" (Openwrt terminology) image for HaP AC2 only switch/firewall/dhcp v4 & v6 client/ AC wifi and finally put HaP AC2 to place where it belong
Why would a normal user run an RC version?Thank you for the feedback but how is a normal user supposed to do this downgrade ? It's only possible via support, I believe ?
You ALMOST got it. I think he wanted to shed some light FROM it...They should be able to shed some light on it ( oh no, wait, you don't want light...sorry, couldnt resist)
Not here where I am.But yes, typically at home, use it till its not fixable or no longer does the job required.
I think You misread my post...Nope. FCC is very specific and fines are stiff. A pretty good explanation, and associated rants, is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9959088 .
Also known as "SWMBO"!WAF acronym.
Yes, it does. But so does IPSec on this hardware. So...WG/ChaCha lack support för HW acceleration
By the way: is it only me, or the text for "Show from which peer route received", on the "v7.1" column is light gray over green - make it quite hard to read?On this page: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... l+Overview
Consider yourself upvoted. I was thinking the same thing here.You should firstly learn how to proper answer simple question.... I didn't ask for your shity network but WHAT IS NOT WORKING FOR YOU?
Yes! Sanity prevails! Thank you!This is the last time I'm saying this. There is no rule that forbids quoting the above post. If you harass people about it, ban for you
Ah, a man of culture, I see.Seems more like a sed and awk problem to me .
I hear You. This is getting out of hand. I just lost the will to post here - too much hassle.Sorry but I lost track of that discussion due to excessive quote stripping (probably mandated by a dictator moderator).
It looks like it is time for another complaint...
I hear you - it's the same for me. That thing get me crawling up the walls. No idea why, it just does.It's way off topic for this thread of course, but I can't stand Winbox. The windowed and tabular format for sub-config items drives me mad. Don't know why, it just does.
I don't think they have problems sourcing the small metal USB cage. It probably is the USB controller chip that can´t be found.Will the USB port still function if we solder one to the board ourselves?
Mikrotik have a policy of supporting any given model for 5 years after it's discontinued. At least had, and I don't think it changed. So...I am ok with that. Just more worried that 7.7 would be the last update for them.
I understand that's a bug. But is it important? What's the problem of having one link-local address on a disabled interface?ROS v7.7 stable is still generating link-local addressing for *disabled* VPN interfaces such as GRE or WireGuard. When will MikroTik fix this?
Basically, everything. Open "Design Skin" and You will see.@rextended that works nice ...
are there any other menu items that can be nade invisible thru that default.json ?
for example on a MT without wifi I like to hide the wireless menus
One can always dream...Hopefully they will remove the entire feature, it is just a nuisance.
Well, we could easily go far beyond 7.100. So... I wouldn't worry too much about lack of numbers. Now, worrying about BGP is another thing...With recent release numbering scheme, I wonder if there is enough numbers left to get stable before we get to 8.0 ;-)
Will it be? Come to think about it, is /127 supported? Will it be?/31 was never officially supported, use /32 instead.
That did it! Thanks. :DUse:
Code: Select all/export show-sensitive
Good to know.The REAL problem is RFC 7168: this is the one we should worry about!
I tested it here and it conforms to the protocol perfectly. It just returns a 418 is all.
Don't we all. But I like this "release early and release frequently" way: much better than a giant beta each two months. Let's hope they keep it this way from now on.It looks like a minor release with a couple of quick fixes. Still hoping for major work on e.g. BGP to be finished.
We all can. But let's keep optimistic, shall we? After all, if this is the end of times I want to go sleeping, just like my uncle. Not screaming in fright, like his passengers.I can think of worse things .....................
Duly tested.Test
Shhh... Don't give them ideas...Hell, look at the CRS2116 - that box is basically everything I could've asked for in a $1000 router, MT could've charged almost 2x as much and I'd still have a preorder with our distributor.
Disgruntled employee? Paranoic admin, with device more physically exposed than would be advised?Who would disable especially the console port ?
A much better switch, more flexibility and since all ports are on the same switch, one could use it as router AND as a one port SFP+ switch. An easy way to put one file server on a small network.What does the RB5009 give you that the RB4011 doesnt ?? and only for few more bucks $$ CCR1009
Maybe they were infected earlier, and just upgraded without netinstall?This is scary - how are devices running 6.48.3 being infected?
Hearsay, here on the forum. To be clear: August 23 is rumored to be the date for 7.1beta7 - not 7 gold.I would love to hear where this August 23 date was taken from
As always, bpwl is right. It is exactly what I'm saying.Call me one of those idiots, who think the computer should do the calculations, not the human operator.
That would be good too. Mikrotik really should give IPv6 some love.Myself, I would like to see IPv6 features to be on-par with IPv4. There are still lots of features in the firewall and static routing that are not available for IPv6, and they really should be.
Only the SoHo models. The CCR, RBxxxx (does RB4011 do this?) and CRS lines don't do this. I think CHR doesn't do it too.The default configuration on RouterBoards, does indeed consider ether1 as the 'WAN' port.
I only need the admin user to create my own user.was about "one user"
Very well. But please, PLEASE (with a cherry on top!), make so we can disable it! Something like the IPv6 on RoS6 - we can just disable it.We don't plan to make quickset a separate package. We actually plan to reduce number of packages
Really? Long posts? How about not hijacking someone else's thread?@Paternot
To equaly treat all users:
please read my footer and do not quote whole long posts without need viewtopic.php?p=864499#p864499
Have You tried to pass traffic through the host server, to check if it's just the VM or both loosing packets? Have You pinned the VM CPUs to the host CPU cores?We have 4 memory sticks, and I have checked and no CPU core on the host is maxing during production traffic yet we still see packetloss