If there really isn't anything configured on the router as you claimed, it can only be a layer 1 / layer 2 issue.
Check Ethernet cables, ports, errors, duplex mismatches, etc.
/routing filter ?Cisco, Juniper, Huawei, Alcatel, etc... all have the option to create a "prefix-list" for filters. I'm surprised Mikrotik doesn't offer this option...
LOLOnce per three years is more than enough.
Those are switches, not routers.CRS326
Yes - that's precisely why the topic says Denial of Service, and not ExploitThis is not an exploit.
/ip firewall address-list add address=127.0.0.1 comment="_TEST_" list="test" timeout=00:02:00
Because the OP *specifically* mentions MM fiber?Why 300 meters. With S+31DLC10D single mode sfp+ 10km. It is compatibleAs long as you're within the 300m distance limitation, yes. No reason why it won't work.
That's also true yes. x86 does not support vxmnet3, so no 10G.I think you are limited to E1000 cards if you use x86 but if you use CHR you can use vxmnet3 which will give more performance.
VMWare Workstation no. You'd need to use ESXi (vSphere).Does VMWare (Running inside Windows 10 PRO) support TRUNK interfaces? and How to achieve that?
Ah yes, of course. Thanks!On RB951-2n (R2) ether1 default L2MTU is 1600, that's why only ether2 appear in the export.
There's nothing pretty about it. It's a HUGE PITA Even with +cti, it's still not a "dumb" terminal.You forgot that RouterOS terminal by default will output pretty lines with colour codes
And IPv6 filter on dst-address doesn't work at all in WinboxHello!
RouterOS "ip route print where dst-address in x.x.x.x/z" is fast. But for a reason the same for ipv6 is slow (when the number of routes is large).
Please, make ipv6 route lookups fast as well.
Will ask the DC engineers to take some pics when they replace it. 4 CCR's purchased (over a period of 2 years), this is now the 3rd one failingHi Chris,
Let us know if the C10 capacitor is leaking, and if it has the black plastic around it.
HUH?If you don't care about having the latest RouterOS version all the time, your license is free with any speed.
email@example.comThank you very much for your opinions. Anybody knows how to report this bug?
+1I believe 10g optics and a piece of fiber are cheaper than a 10 meter (active) DAC cable...
We must stop saying that. You just delayed ROS7 by another year nowindeed, very useful and maybe a new CoDel/fq_codel queue type..
Maybe on ros7
NPThanks for raising a 2 year old topic from the dead.Try telling that to your distributors
Try telling that to your distributorsLike I said, we have not made products with these capacitors since many years, if you have such device, it is covered by warranty.
/ip firewall mangle add action=mark-routing chain=preprouting comment=Steam dst-port=27000-27600 protocol=udp passthrough=no new-routing-mark=GW2
Mangle rules to mark the traffic (mark routing), and multiple default routes in the routing tables, based on the route-markI can imagine I have to configure 2 bridges but how can I set a default route for each bridge?
And... I tell them that a can't give tham that data because of the goverment security ) But i sad that you can come to my city for testing ) And the next - only silent from support )))
There's been PLENTY of comments from MT, "it will be fixed in v7"I might be wrong, but as far as I remember, it was always "we can't fix this now, because we need a new kernel", and not "v7 will have this and that"
Wine works fine with MAC (L2) connection and other features.
As quite a few said yes....but /127 just plain did not work. When I experimented a bit and changed the mask of the PTP interface from /127 to /64, everything started working right away
OKNah, that's where you're wrong. They know it very well. It's quite common to assign a /64 that's routed behind a /127, that's not the question here.Whom ever assigned you a /64, and even worse a /127, doesn't know how IPv6 works.
The issue is the /127.If I set the default route GW to 2a01:XXXX:2:6::18/127, it's immediately marked as unreachable, even though it can be pinged at the same time.
Looks like you might have some older ros installed. I also used to have these errors but it vanished in more recent versions...
And yet again nothing in the changelogs, sigh...MikroTik RouterOS 6.37 has support for the following PPP attributes,
Yes, I'm not disputing that they CAN get them. The point is they WONT get them. Fundamental difference between the twoWe have managed to get replacement PSU's for CCR1016/1036 and for CCR1072 from our Mikrotik distributor.
So they can get them...