MikroTik

buset1974

what is the point of BGP instance? looks like we have the same in the template? Instance was needed to link evpns, and also it will now allow to add other features that required per instance configuration. Could you take a look mrz, some people including me having problem after upgrading to v 7.20b...

buset1974

having problem with routing bgp instance after upgrade.

thx

buset1974

In my RB4011 with ~1500 routes and 15 blackhole routes it takes about 2 seconds to execute. So I could understand why with a full internet feed it could appear "stuck". Wait some time and see how long it takes. Yes, it's not exactly stuck, but it takes a long time to respond. Well, I thin...

buset1974

*) routing-filter - use zero as default as-path length (allows matching empty as path);

did u mean that bgp-path-len issue now works? SUP-183226
i have try filter bgp-path-len, now it's works.

thx

buset1974

The '/routing/route/print where blackhole' command is stuck in a full route environment. In my RB4011 with ~1500 routes and 15 blackhole routes it takes about 2 seconds to execute. So I could understand why with a full internet feed it could appear "stuck". Wait some time and see how long...

buset1974

The '/routing/route/print where blackhole' command is stuck in a full route environment.

buset1974

Well, as I said before, NMS runs fine when collecting the same information from Cisco (NCS4000) and Juniper MX, as well as Mikrotik v6 (6.49.13), all under similar conditions (routers with large full routes, approximately 1 million routes). But the problem happen in v7 , i have tested til the latest...

buset1974

Does anyone have a problem with NMS (Cacti & LibreNMS)? The problem occurs when NMS fails to detect devices using SNMP. This issue only happens on devices running v7, even the latest 7.19.rc2 has a problem. I've already filed a ticket, SUP-169547, and Mikrotik once said, "Do not monitor lar...

buset1974

As long as I know, RouterOS v7 has been introduced for almost 10 years, and people have been hoping and promising so much about it. Now, it's become an anticlimax. v7 isn't exactly better than v6, and now the magic of v7 is suddenly being used for ROSE, which is quite disappointing. Mikrotik has a &...

buset1974

That does not qualify as "completely broken".

Have u fix bgp-path-len mrz?

Thx

buset1974

Testing is fun, but for production I would be much happier with some kind of long term supported ROS 7 release...
The rather skimpy content in the newsletter does suggest MT is working on software ;)

+1

buset1974

SUP-185949, reported CCR1072 v7.18.2 setup as PE with vpls and L3-VPN4 inside, having random rebooted by proper shutdown. if you find any miss configuration at least you can reply which configuration that caused it. this router running well in v6 and just upgraded last weeks and already having 2 ra...

buset1974

SUP-185949, reported CCR1072 v7.18.2 setup as PE with vpls and L3-VPN4 inside, having random rebooted by proper shutdown. if you find any miss configuration at least you can reply which configuration that caused it. this router running well in v6 and just upgraded last weeks and already having 2 ran...

buset1974

i got feeling that the stable version will come very very so0n
Not so fast, first there will be a release candidate.

Dont hope too.much as they said, 99% problems caused by miss configuration.

buset1974

It's company policy and I can't comment on that, but what I can tell you personally, is that we get hundreds of "bug reports" every day, and 99.99% of them are bad configuration or misunderstanding about something. If all these would be turned into bug reports directly, it would be utter ...

buset1974

Deploying VPNv6 Over IPv4 LDPv4, on an environment of per-vrf label allocation seams to be really simple in the point RouterOS is now. Seams that if they just rework a bit how the NLRI of MP-BGP is created for this scenario and they are good to go. As I know, RouterOS 7 is based on Linux kernel, ma...

buset1974

anyone have problem with bgp filtering for local as?
regexp ^$ or bgp-path-len < 1 did not works
what do you want to achieve?

Advertise any prefix originately from the router itself.

In v6 regexp ^$ works
But in v7 did not works

Thx

buset1974

anyone have problem with bgp filtering for local as?
regexp ^$ or bgp-path-len < 1 did not works

thx

buset1974

It might actually happen sooner than you'd expect. Word is Mikrotik has recently brought on about 15 people, supposedly working full-time on developing business-oriented features.

True word or gossip?

buset1974

naming inconsistent
cli =>/routing/filter/communities-list
winbox => /routing filters -> communites Set

buset1974

Set blackhole yes on routing filter broken on 7.19.beta6
Last known work 7.18.2

Reported SUP-183157 with supout from both version.

Thx

*) route-filter - fixed the "blackhole" option setting process;

Yes, it work now, you may close the ticket

buset1974

We are still waiting for VPNv6 support over IPv4 infrastructure. We don't insist to the IPv4-only backbone, we like IPv6, or we would like to :-) Sure, it would be appreciated to move from MPLS to SR, maybe it would be better for the vendor and for the end-users, or SRv6 if too hard to implement IP...

buset1974

But could You do a quick heads up here? Just a little list of small bullet points, Mikrotik style? :D I have already done that in almost every release topic after 7.16 so no need to repeat it. My support ticket was created July 2024 and has not received a reply after August 2024 despite several upd...

buset1974

We are still waiting for VPNv6 support over IPv4 infrastructure.
+1 to vpnv6 over IPv4.

+1 6vpe, 6pe hope they listen

buset1974

Waiting for the next beta

buset1974

Anyone has successfully make a routing filter in bgp
To filter any prefix that came from the same local as?
I did before in v6 uing regex "^\$" but its not work in v7.

buset1974

Set blackhole yes on routing filter broken on 7.19.beta6
Last known work 7.18.2

Reported SUP-183157 with supout from both version.

Thx

buset1974

Any reason why MT still hide vpn6 from winbox.
They should tell us reason and the limitation because there is 7.18.x announce as stable version

Thx

buset1974

*) route - fixed stuck output when calling prints from multiple routing menus; Still having stuck when doing "/routing/route/print where blackhole" or "/ip/route/print where blackhole" Tested on CCR1009 with 2 full route peering for ipv4 (950k) & ipv6 (210k) and 1 RTBH peer r...

buset1974

I can't wait whatsnew in 7.19

buset1974

I ask again for focus on: - Ensuring minimum resources, and also limiting them to a certain maximum, for control-plane processes. - Correcting and optimizing existing network protocols (VRF, L3VPN, 6PE/6vPE, BGP-LU, Flowspec). - Making Kernel bypass and hardware offload work in these protocols. - S...

buset1974

VPNv6 does indeed work, but only partially, as it does not support an IPv4 backbone as a transport layer.

Up

buset1974

LDP signaled VPLS works BGP signaled VPLS works VPNv6 works either misconfiguration or very specific setup. Its totally basic setup in labs, both CHR and physical routerboards. There is a P router in the middle and 3 PE on that. This is the MPLS and Routing config from first PE router (RB750Gr3): [...

buset1974

LDP signaled VPLS works
BGP signaled VPLS works
VPNv6 works

either misconfiguration or very specific setup.
Could you please share an example config with at least 4 devices RouterOS, being at least one on P.Router Only, with the v7.18rc ?

Up

buset1974

Hi mrz, any reason why MT still hide vpn6 afi from winbox? If there any limitation should we know about? By the way, it is worth mentioning that the syntax between routing and routes is still incongruent: [administrator@fischerdouglas] > /routing/bgp/connection/print where address-families= ip ipv6...

buset1974

LDP signaled VPLS works
BGP signaled VPLS works
VPNv6 works

either misconfiguration or very specific setup.

Hi mrz, any reason why MT still hide vpn6 afi from winbox?
If there any limitation should we know about?

buset1974

What's new in 7.18rc2 (2025-Feb-21 12:50): *) cloud - added "Back To Home Files" feature (additional fixes); *) dhcpv6-relay - added option to create routes for bindings passing through relay (additional fixes); *) disk - do not allow adding device in raid when major settings mismatch in ...

buset1974

MikroTik ADN is network, why spend so time to storage when network features is becoming unstable... I agree... lot of not really oriented network routers/switching/firewall features, but since this release, when seeing ipv6 fast tracking, i can say it's a great thing. What the point MT selling CCR ...

buset1974

Hi MT,
from this road map,
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... l+Overview

any ETA or which version 6vpe & 6PE will be implemented?

thx

buset1974

from this road map,
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... l+Overview

any ETA or which version 6vpe & 6PE will be implemented?

thx

buset1974

What's new in 7.18beta6 (2025-Feb-12 11:20): *) bridge - improved stability when using MLAG with MSTP (introduced in v7.17); *) cloud - added file-share feature (additional fixes); *) file - improved handling of filesystems with many files (additional fixes); *) ipsec - added hardware acceleration ...

buset1974

hi oreggin it's seem that you also got U = unreachable status for vpnv6 next-hop any trick to make it active? Currently IPv4 mapped gateways cannot be resolved. You have to change the gateway to valid ipv6 address with routing filters. Any ETA or in what major version it will resolved mrz? thx

buset1974

- U - b 2001:db8::/48&65000:105 ::ffff:10.0.0.1 vpn6 200 40 30 This is in your RIB, not in mine. You wrote: " it's seem that you also got U = unreachable status for vpnv6 next-hop", but I haven't got because I use native IPv6 datapath for VPNv6. That's why VPNv6 routes are active in m...

buset1974

viewtopic.php?p=1123531#p1123531
Which row contains "U"nreachable flag?
-U- b 2001:db8::/48&65000:105 ::ffff:10.0.0.1 vpn6 200 40 30

buset1974

Flags: U - UNREACHABLE; b - BGP
Ub 2001:db8::/48&65000:105 ::ffff:10.0.0.1 vpn6 200 40 30
viewtopic.php?p=1123531#p1123531
Which row contains "U"nreachable flag?

Ub 2001:db8::/48&65000:105 ::ffff:10.0.0.1 vpn6 200 40 30

buset1974

it's seem that you also got U = unreachable status for vpnv6 next-hop Where did you see them unreachable? any trick to make it active? Yes, as I mentioned, you MUST use IPv6 BGP neighborship and IPv6 IGP + LDPv6, but won't work with latest stable/testing releases. IIRC last worked with 7.17beta2 or...

buset1974

mikrotik does not Support BGP VPNv6 over IPv4 MPLS LDP transport? [admin@PE2] > /routing/route/print where afi=vpn6 Flags: U - UNREACHABLE; b - BGP Columns: DST-ADDRESS, GATEWAY, AFI, DISTANCE, SCOPE, TARGET-SCOPE DST-ADDRESS GATEWAY AFI DISTANCE SCOPE TARGET-SCOPE Ub 2001:db8::/48&65000:105 ::...

buset1974

mikrotik does not Support BGP VPNv6 over IPv4 MPLS LDP transport? [admin@PE2] > /routing/route/print where afi=vpn6 Flags: U - UNREACHABLE; b - BGP Columns: DST-ADDRESS, GATEWAY, AFI, DISTANCE, SCOPE, TARGET-SCOPE DST-ADDRESS GATEWAY AFI DISTANCE SCOPE TARGET-SCOPE Ub 2001:db8::/48&65000:105 ::...

buset1974

well, i double check again, MT hide vpn6 option from winbox, it can be set using cli.

thx

buset1974

You mean 6PE and 6VPE, right? IIRC 6PE is not supported yet, only 6VPE over IPv6. VPNv6 routes exchanging over IPv4 BGP session too, but the nexthop encoding is incorrect and/or IPv6 route over IPv4 nexthop is not supported. i dont see any vpnv6 and send-label parameters available in bgp. so i thin...

buset1974

anyone has successfully experience implement MPLS-VPN6 (6vpe) on v7?
is it works?

thx

buset1974

any plan to make some /ip/route or /routing/route option faster (specially when we run the command on full route router)
example:

/ip route print where blackhole
/routing/route print where blackhole

buset1974

waiting for this
viewtopic.php?t=213301

This is a important BGP bugs, it s not a new feature, its a bug, i dont think we need to wait new major version to fix this.

buset1974

The future with MT is bleak anything with Service Provider solution my company accept that facts now, we are now going back to Juniper as much as possible and put mikrotik on some areas as we see it fit or put them in the shelves for eternity who knows one of these days they are going to land some ...

buset1974

Yes there sure are terrible issues with BGP in current releases, but it is difficult to debug them. This week I had a case where one BGP peer connects, routes are received OK (remote is RouterOS v6 so none of that stupid "routes are sent only after one keepalive timer" rubbish), then afte...

buset1974

Speaking about MPLS / VPLS, did someone try to see if the last versions are still losing packets on CCR2216? As far as I know, it is still an unresolved issue.

that kind of problem in MPLS/VPLS happen since v6 anyway

buset1974

What's new in 7.16rc5 (2024-Sep-20 14:11): *) leds - fixed SFP+ LEDs for CCR1072 (introduced in v7.16beta2); *) lte - fixed R11e-LTE no traffic flow when modem with older firmware version is used (additional fixes); *) modem - fixed PPP link recovery when port unexpectedly removed and returned due ...

buset1974

polish behavior with new Winbox 4, but - who knows...
Would not make sense to me. Winbox 4 is early beta and that should not be any priority for any stable ROS version right now.

Agree, we are hoping years to get MT v7 stable , the hardware seem promising though

buset1974

Why is so hard for MT to make a real stable system, compare with cisco, juniper, even vyos, its suppose have a very powerfull cpu right? With so many rams and cpus Kernel panic Unstable bgp Suddenly Reboot by watchdog. Thx Reasons to move to new kernel versions include: - major new features that hav...

buset1974

does anyone, make it doing bgp filter out add bgp-communities no-export?

dear @MT please check the filter script for problem aboved

thx

buset1974

7.16.beta4 still have bugs in BGP VPN4 in a particular cases.
has been reported almost a month ago.
Please check ticket no SUP-3085 for details & videos what the problem is and response the ticket please

thx

buset1974

*) route - improved system stability

MT Can u explain detail exactly

Thx

buset1974

CPU usage means you are using the device for something. If you still see 100% CPU with no configuration and cables unplugged, email support with your RIF file Dear Normis, Please take a look SUP-3085, i sent u many rif on that tickets, problem happen and captured from CCR1009, running simple single...

buset1974

CPU usage means you are using the device for something. If you still see 100% CPU with no configuration and cables unplugged, email support with your RIF file Dear Normis, Please take a look SUP-3085, i sent u many rif on that tickets, problem happen and captured from CCR1009, running simple single...

buset1974

Quite some time passed since rc2. I can smell final release already...😂
Final release without an RC to check if memory leak was corrected?
Sounds like a bad choice.
Sounds like 7.15.1 will be launched before we would like.

Not too fast, rc2 still have bugs with cpu 100%

thx

buset1974

Be careful Rc2 have CPU (cpu1, routing) lock 100% bugs, i believe caused by BGP and has been reported SUP-132127 It's also cause some configuration cannot be read. /routing/bgp> export # 2024-05-05 10:09:54 by RouterOS 7.15rc2 # software id = F7QD-XXXX # # model = CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ # serial number =...

buset1974

something happen in beta6, in our MPLS L3 networks, routing advertised by PE with 7.15beta6 suddenly cannot do recursive routing to other PE i think this changed can caused it, not sure *) route - rework of route attributes; *) vrf - fixed VRF interfaces being moved to main table after reboot (intr...

buset1974

something happen in beta6, in our MPLS L3 networks, routing advertised by PE with 7.15beta6 suddenly cannot do recursive routing to other PE i think this changed can caused it, not sure *) route - rework of route attributes; *) vrf - fixed VRF interfaces being moved to main table after reboot (intro...

buset1974

*) mpls - fixed VPN fragmentation when forwarding IP traffic

Can u explain more?

Thx

buset1974

I tested this version on my CCR 1016 where MPLS and VPLS {LDP} is running. After 3 to 5 minutes router reboots and it keeps repating over and over. On version 7.12.1 everything is ok. Has anyone same experience? No error in log. have a similar experience, report SUP-132127 and no reply ever since. ...

buset1974

every problem reported supout will be first ask by MT. but not all problem can be captured in supout if we generated after rebooted. and not all the supout can be generated when problem occurs. question: sometime we see autosupout file in the router, anyone knows when exactly autosupout generated? a...

buset1974

providing default route via VRF-BGP is totally broken on v7. I got ticket opened. I've been advised to provide more details, as soon as i provided, i haven't received any response Dear MT, Can u check this issue please. So many people using your hardware as enterprise things not just a home things ...

buset1974

Our CCR2004-16G-2S+ which ran fine with 7.11beta4 has now had two occurrences of "router was rebooted without proper shutdown by watchdog timer". Did others see this as well? I have submitted a support ticket with supout.rif. Usually they ask supout before and after rebooted, well sometim...

buset1974

Is it possible MT can make /ip services works in multiple vrf like cisco.
because in v7 /ip service can only choose for 1 vrf only

thx

buset1974

It seems that v7.12 stable will not generate OSPF LSA type3 - “inter-area-prefix“ while v7.11.2 stable is ok. Here are configs: https://z1.ax1x.com/2023/11/16/pitmIfK.png [admin@ROS7.11.2A] >export /ip address add address=10.0.0.1/24 interface=ether1 network=10.0.0.0 add address=192.168.1.1/25 inte...

buset1974

Until v7.12 in MPLS L3 env/ topology. /routing/route/print where routing-table=xxxx or /ip/route print where routing-table=xxxx did not show any routes when /ip/vrf interfaces=none. Works for me in any version above 7.11 [admin@MikroTik] /ip/route> /ip vrf/print Flags: X - disabled; * - builtin 0 n...

buset1974

Until v7.12 in MPLS L3 env/ topology. /routing/route/print where routing-table=xxxx or /ip/route print where routing-table=xxxx did not show any routes when /ip/vrf interfaces=none. Interfaces must fill with some working interfaces (dummy loopback) to make it works. we also have to enable disable th...

buset1974

When upgrading v6.4x to latest v7.11.x. value export import route target became invalids (suffix " L " added on the value) > /routing/bgp/vpn/print Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive 0 ;;; no available router id value name="bgp-mpls-vpn-1" import.route-targets=1L:1 export.route-ta...

buset1974

Another hardware coming with ampere processor?

buset1974

Dear Mikrotik,

as you know that routeros not only use for home user but also use as enterprise service.
Can u hide or secure the quickset button so no one can miss click the button please.

thx

buset1974

Upgrading from v6.9x to 7.12rc2 all bgp, mpls, ospf settimg all missing.

Thx

buset1974

They must doing more frequently, so many unanswer tickets

buset1974

Dear Mikrotik,
Please reply our TIket SUP-128175
regarding failing when upgrading production router with many bgp peering from v6.49.8 to v7.11.2 above (7.12.beta.x)
router got freeze

thx

buset1974

version 7 was an anti-climax for Mikrotik, not as expected.

buset1974

Can anyone in MT fix the VPLS de fragment on 7.12 please?

please see this topic for detail viewtopic.php?p=1022490#p1022490

thx

buset1974

Check debug logs, see what is the error

Hi normis,

Could you check my report regarding vpls defragment problem?
viewtopic.php?p=1022490#p1022490
It's happen in v7

Thx

buset1974

VPLS bigger than 1558 did not works in v7.11 but if one of the PE's using v6 it works like a charm. i did change both PW control domain into "default" and "Enabled", both are has the same result. See all the details in https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=1022490#p1022490 thx

buset1974

hi,

i tried both PE's (PE2 & PE5) using v.7.11
and the result still the same , i cannot create vpls greater than 1558

Is it a bugs? I did change PW-control word into "default" or "Enabled" both did not works

thx

buset1974

Does MT aware of this CVE 2023-30799

buset1974

What's new in 7.11beta4 (2023-Jul-05 13:33): *) bluetooth - added "decode-ad" command for decoding raw Bluetooth payloads (CLI only); *) bluetooth - added "Peripheral devices" section which displays decoded Eddystone TLM and UID, iBeacon and MikroTik Bluetooth payloads; *) bridg...

buset1974

Hi peichl, i tried /routing/route/print where belongs-to did not works either. can u capture yours for example, maybe i did wrong Parameter of "belongs-to" is like "bgp-IP-1.2.3.4" when your BGP peer has address 1.2.3.4 Probably for other routing protocols it will be similar. It...

buset1974

/routing/route/print where received-from=bgp1 or /routing/route/print where received-from bgp1 did not works, wait for hours and no prefix has displayed thx That is correct. You need to use "belongs-to". received-from is a field from RouterOS v6 that is no longer supported in any 7.x vers...

buset1974

/routing/route/print where received-from=bgp1
or
/routing/route/print where received-from bgp1

did not works, wait for hours and no prefix has displayed

thx

buset1974

Hi Mikrotik, in v6.48.9 /ipv6 route print Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, C - connect, S - static, r - rip, o - ospf, b - bgp, U - unreachable DST-ADDRESS GATEWAY DISTANCE 0 ADb 2001:4:112::/48 fe80::a05:e2ff:fe07:7... 20 1 Db 2001:4:112::/48 fe80::a05:e2ff:fe07:7... 20 2 ADb 2001:500:...

buset1974

finally v7 can do /routing/bgp/advertisement print.
i dont know when exactly this feature silently added.

thx

buset1974

is there any plan to add feature to make mikrotik can resolve ipv6 domain.
example:

ping6 microsoft.com

thx

buset1974

You will have to understand that v7 bgp is different from v6 bgp, many commands are different and some things are no longer there.

So could u tech me or maybe us how?

Thx

buset1974

When you will fix bgp advertisement?

Thx
may you explain the issue you experience about bgp advertisement?
I have just a delay in advertisement, delay that icrease over time.

This command missing in v7 /routing/bgp/advertisements print

buset1974

When you will fix bgp advertisement?

Thx

buset1974

*) mpls - added FastPath support;

how to activate this feature?

thx

buset1974

Bgp prefix count work now, not realtime but is ok for now.
Hope in 7.10, show bgp advertise also fixed.
Before both work i will not upgrade my production router.
Long wait

Thx

buset1974

is there any way to block the issue using firewall?
maybe it's useful for someone that still cannot upgrade their router for some reason.

thx

buset1974

!) ipv6 - fixed DNS server processing by IPv6/ND services (CVE-2023-32154); What this issue affects: The issue affects devices running MikroTik RouterOS versions v6.xx and v7.xx with enabled IPv6 advertisement receiver functionality. You are only affected if one of the below settings is applied: the...

buset1974

*) routerboard - fixed memory test on CCR2116-12G-4S+ ("/system routerboard upgrade" required); Could you please explain what it means? Will this solve the problem with our CCR2116, which is rebooting every 1-2 days with a watchdog timer error? Oh my god, The problem still exist on v7? I ...

buset1974

I've been able to use 1500 bytes with ROSv7 and VPLS for quite a while with no issues. It' actually how my home network is built which has been running VPLS on ROSv7 for more than a year. We've also got some ISP clients using it in prod. What hardware is this running on? The image looks like GNS3/C...

buset1974

Check line 50 in the PE-5-V7.rsc
Are you certain, you want that disabled?

i tried to enable disable that line, result is the same.

buset1974

i am having issue with vpls mtu after upgrading from v6 to latest v7 (7.9beta4)
here is the detail
viewtopic.php?t=194895
And here the tickets number SUP-111902
thx

buset1974

Hi, On well run ospf +mpls network ,vpls created cannot reached MTU more than 1490. Problem happen if one or both of the PE using v7 but if both PE using v6 everything running well. [admin@SIDE-2] > ping 192.168.200.5 size=1490 do-not-fragment SEQ HOST SIZE TTL TIME STATUS 0 192.168.200.5 1490 64 3m...

buset1974

Check v7.9beta4

I have tested,
path selection in v7 vpn4 as i describe above now works

i appreciate

thank's maris

buset1974

We are working of BFD support.
From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9.

pe1chl, do you have any issue with BGP in 7.8?

Let we see together what he s promised in 7.9

buset1974

We are working of BFD support. From brief look over reported BGP issues in the this topic, they should be polished and fixed in 7.9. pe1chl, do you have any issue with BGP in 7.8? hi sergejs. please check ticket number [Ticket#2018112922000575] for the BGP vpn4 issue. I also explain details how to ...

buset1974

This topic how to produce the problem. this the topology made with GNS3 lab. topology-PE-CE.jpeg.jpg CE advertise it’s loopback ip 192.168.0.100 to PE1 & PE2 with diffrent path length, hope that short bgp_path will be choosen as we can see in PE3 try this steps: 1. After CE rebooted everything l...

buset1974

BGP vpn4 still problem, cust bgp path did not advertised to other PEs.
Please check mikrotik this problem did not happen in v6.

buset1974

Bgp vpn4 path distribution and calculation still problem, i am not using this version for production yet

buset1974

It is already fixed in v7.7 and v7.8betas

Can u explain more exactly what you have fixed for bpg vpn4?
It still have problem with best path calculation?

Thx

buset1974

V 7.7 BGP vpn4 routing withdraw still problem.

buset1974

Dear Mikrotik.
It's almost 2023 , when our CCR2xxx can run proper BGP (VPN4) in v7?
i've made the tickets for the issue [SUP-3085], problem reported since 2018

buset1974

still no progress on VPNV4 and BFD :-(

BGP cosmetic progress only

buset1974

Incredible that the forgotten space in the message "route,bgp,error HoldTimer expiredpeername" (between expired and peername) still hasn't been fixed... Such a major blocking issue, it is a shame They keep ignoring the bugs and pretend nothing happen. people waiting for years to be fixed....

buset1974

Fix VPN4 BGP please!

buset1974

FiX the BGP please

buset1974

originate-default generates type5 lsa, which is not flooded to stub areas, this is true for any vendor. @mrz, could you check my Ticket that has not been reply yet SUP-3085 the problem reported since 2019, regarding BGP vpn4 problem with route calculate/ withdrawn And the problem still happen in v7...

buset1974

You can use alternative opensource like vyos to get better BGP advance service, i don't know when BGP in mikrotik will be ready and fixed. i wonder if "vyos" can run in mikrotik hardware, metarouter or container. The big problem is the investment in knowledge and configurations for Router...

buset1974

One big building, several separate subnets on separate wires. Any dynamic routing is really not needed in our scenario. Failover is done on 2L. So it is not a BIG NETWORK. For actual big and complex networks that require dynamic routing with complex routing policies, v7 is beta at best. Crucial fea...

buset1974

Please check this PE-CE BGP issue SUP-79812
Ticket open since mar 2022
And also PE-CE BGP multihoming issue SUP-3085
problem reported since 2019

thx

buset1974

on v7.6rc1 mpls L3vpn still broken, eventhough PE - CE using static

Thx

buset1974

possibly, I am facing a bug in CHR version 7.6beta10. When I open "Sessions" tab of Routing/BGP menu and select a session and click "Refresh" and then refresh, session is stopped. The only way I found to bring session online again is rebooting the router. i have the same experie...

buset1974

BGP VRF MPLS L3 (PE-CE) in v7.6 beta7
still having problem with routing propagation.
route sent from PE did not propagate correctly to Other PE's, missing AS-PATH

capture-7.6beta7.jpg

thx

When will you fix this BGP issue?
How many longer we should wait?

buset1974

BGP VRF MPLS L3 (PE-CE) in v7.6 beta7
still having problem with routing propagation.
route sent from PE did not propagate correctly to Other PE's, missing AS-PATH

capture-7.6beta7.jpg

thx

This problem still exist in 7.6beta8

thx

buset1974

BGP VRF MPLS L3 (PE-CE) in v7.6 beta7
still having problem with routing propagation.
route sent from PE did not propagate correctly to Other PE's, missing AS-PATH

capture-7.6beta7.jpg

thx

buset1974

For my mpls + bgp network, for safety ikeep stay on 6.49.x
My CCR2004 only test bench, so unused
To much hoping

buset1974

Until today as u can see, bugs still exist in v6 and a lot of people operate their CCR1xxxx with that poor condition, in some of my tickets MT always promised the bugs will be fix in v7, now MT offer us new hardware CCR2xxx that works best in v7 and as we know v7 is not properly finished yet. how ca...

buset1974

MPLS and BGP development in MT is next to none, to be blunt we are a minority as far as MT is concern our use case is minuscule a lot of people here share the same sentiments as I am. If only i have a power and influence to change our network gear to something else I'll be happy to do it and won't ...

buset1974

What's new in 7.5beta11 (2022-Aug-17 13:14): *) bgp - improved stability when "default-originate" is configured; BGP vrf still broken, - "default originate" now successfully advertised to CE, - BGP vrf session now can show "Established" - BGP uptime still show "496...

buset1974

Well, when the software will be properly stable then, all promise v7 will solve routing problem still not proven yet.
I cannot depend on mikrotik anymore in my environment, i dont think v7 will be stable soon

buset1974

With recent release numbering scheme, I wonder if there is enough numbers left to get stable before we get to 8.0 ;-)

And it will be a new router series will released CCR3xxxx

thx

buset1974

The talk about an "entirely new routing engine" already started ~10 years ago, when the mythical v7 was introduced that would solve all our problems and fulfill all our wishes. I believe that when MT Developers adopted the newer Linux Kernel [the very heart of the OS ] for version RoS v7 ...

buset1974

What's new in 7.4beta5 (2022-Jun-27 10:39): *) container - added support for running Docker (TM) containers on ARM, ARM64 and x86; *) dhcpv4-server - disallowed overriding message type option; *) dhcpv4-server - log message when user option updates existing option; *) dhcpv4-server - placed option ...

buset1974

it's a bad habit that mikrotik support ask some question then leave the customer without answer

buset1974

Hi Team Could you work on BGP on VRF ? thanks Or even better: could you work on BGP? BGP seems to be at a standstill, even though this is the major area of feature incompleteness in v7 relative to v6. I also reported possibility memory leak caused by bgp vrf issue, i believe security issue must be ...

buset1974

Another release without full VRF functionality (as attested by posts from buset1974 and loloski above). I'm perplexed that we're up to a dot-four release, but there still appear to be chunks of L3 VPN functionality missing. These are not bugs; they are things that haven't even been implemented. Spe...

buset1974

When BGP vrf PE-CE issue will be fix? This is BGP configuration in v6 and v7 v6.49.6 (works) 2 name="peer-trial-bgp-ce" instance=bgp1 remote-address=172.19.2.2 remote-as=65500 tcp-md5-key="" nexthop-choice=default multihop=no route-reflect=no hold-time=3m ttl=default in-filter=&q...

buset1974

So you are saying that you cannot upgrade to v7 because these features are missing, but BGP Multipath, RFC6666, and RFC6286 never existed in v6 too. Prefix limits and viewing advertisements are already possible. please check my ticket SUP-79812, the problem related with BGP and i use it in real wor...

buset1974

What's new in 7.3beta40 (2022-May-11 12:18):

it''s been 2 weeks after last release, waiting for the next release.

buset1974

when will BGP PE-CE will be solved in v7?
Please check my tickets SUP-79812 and reply it

buset1974

7.2.3 still having problem with PE-CE bgp vrf, detail already reported please check SUP-79812
please fix it faster, accelerate your works please

buset1974

BGP AFI vrf still problem in V7.3b37, for detail please refer to my ticket SUP-79812

buset1974

v7 introduces years ago (i believe more than 5 years ago) and today in 2022 it's not even finished yet, how many years actually need to make the v7 full finished anyway?

buset1974

in MPLS L3 case, (PE v7.2 and CPE v6.49.3)

BGP vpnv4 Peering between PE and CPE are not working, BGP session were established but PE did not receive any prefix sent by CPE and CPE did not receive any prefix sent by PE.

Please make it BGP stable and completed soon !!

buset1974

No BGP progress?? Please give more attention please?

buset1974

BGP session for address-family ipv4 vrf xxxxx still not work

buset1974

Finally i made it to make MPLS L3 works upgrading working MPLS PE with 6.49.5 to 7.1.5 actually it's not perfectly smooth upgrade, i found out that some of MPLS configuration were missing after upgrading to 7.1.5 - MPLS/MPLS Interface were missing - MPLS/Instance LSR-ID were missing - MPLS/Instance ...

buset1974

I was able to solve the issue. I had to set the STP to none on the bridge that the VPLS was connected to. It was already set to none on the loopback, but apparently when the route changes it also trigger RSTP which drops the traffic. Once I disabled that it worked like a champ. Hi, recently i have ...

buset1974

you're not alone mate.

buset1974

i'am waiting day by day for the next rc

buset1974

Did you try it with basic config? I guess there are some in your config that fails. Why, the device is a router, and I need it as a router. It is not a lab, I need it working as it is. Also what is "basic config"? for me, basic is the what I need from it. As I'm not alone on this, means t...

buset1974

About the whole "v7" thing...: well, you should be aware of the fact that some devices can only run v7. Also, v7 is presented prominently on the software download page as a stable release, which makes some people do the upgrade at a time they probably should not do that yet. I surely unde...

buset1974

Well, of course a CCR1xxx can still run RouterOS v6 whereas a CCR2xxx can run only RouterOS v7 rendering it unusable in the enterprise... i agree with you, CCR2xxx have fancy hardware indeed but unusable "right now" in enterprise. i think CC1xxx lifetime also not in very good experience r...

buset1974

BGP VRF on MPLS Layer 3 implementation still not works.
Everything works fine in 6.49.2

bgp-v7.2rc4.jpg

how many longer should we wait?
V7 is not beta anymore.

thx

export-list.rsc

buset1974

Any progress on bgp and mpls?

buset1974

could u make it fixed fast. It's been 2 weeks i 've waiting. Be patient, we already are waiting for "the new and improved BGP" for almost 10 years! My CCR are getting rusty waiting. I have a lot of tickets regarding routing issue that promise will be solved in v7 I believe a lot a people ...

buset1974

BGP vrf problem is acknowledged and will be fixed in one of the next versions.

Hi,
could u make it fixed fast.
It's been 2 weeks i 've waiting.

thx

buset1974

Any estimation time or in what version L3 MPLS will be ready and working in v7 ?

thx

buset1974

I think the BGP daemon was written from scratch... before new features are added, let's first make the existing features working to the level of RouterOS v6.

unfortunately v7 is not beta anymore, and still not all BGP feature are works

thx

buset1974

when the routing/bgp/session prefix count will be fixed?
or maybe you think that it's not so important?

buset1974

I wanted to update all my routers, because MT said it is stable. I was in the middle of another project, so I didn’t have time. I’m glad I didn’t update.

You made a good decision.

buset1974

Soon

Any status for MPLS L3?
I've upgrade 1 MPLS L3 working node from v6.49.1 to v7.1.
After upgrade, all ospf bgp, mpls indeed converted automatically but the L3 connectivity were broken.

I try to downgrade to 6.49.1 again and the L3 connectivity back to works.

thx

buset1974

I also have the same experience, all the MPLS setup on v6 cannot run on v7.1 I think it's still bugs or under development. before we activate MPLS , the OSPF running well. (all the loopback can ping each other) but after MPLS module start, all the routing went crazy, some of the loopback cannot ping...

buset1974

bgp routing selection on vrf environtment (vpn4) still broken. It cannot choose the right path. simple-topology-multihoming.jpg (please the topology) 1. After CPE rebooted PE-C see that next-hop to 10.10.110.1 will be go to PE-A (good) 2. When CPE disable bgp to PE-A. PE-C see that next-hop will be ...

buset1974

How come the prefix count always show 0 using winbox?
Is other ways to show BGP Prefix counts?

thx

buset1974

what about the MPLS module, is it stable?

buset1974

did anyone successfully migrate mpls to v7.1rc7?
i don't know why my ospf suddenly going crazy (not perfectly works) right after i activated the LDP.

thx

buset1974

/routing/bgp/cache/ did not show prefix counts properly on winbox

buset1974

Cannot set Route Distinguisher on VRF.
VRF cannot work properly!

thx

buset1974

/routing/bgp/cache/print and BGP cache GUI did not show prefix counts

thx

buset1974

Any progress on mpls L3/ VRF routing?

thx

buset1974

Rb3011 uias-rm

after 23h, it is frozen
My RouterOS v7 test lab consists of 3x RB3011.

They are all happily running with OSPF + LDP with no lockups or reboots.

have u simulate vrf / L3 vpn on your mpls? BGP vpn4

thx

buset1974

Keep Crashing/ rebooted anytime i add new vrf using /ip/vrf/add or using GUI I'am testing using RB1100 i try to activate vrf and the problem happen please check the supout file (this is a lab router not a production one so there is no secret on supout file) Is there any tutorial how to properly set ...

buset1974

Missing bgp-as-path information when /ip/route/print detail MikroTik-BGP] > /ip/route/print detail where 8.8.4.4 in dst-address Flags: D - dynamic; X - disabled, I - inactive, A - active; c - connect, s - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, d - dhcp, v - vpn, m - modem, y - copy; H - hw-offloaded; +...

buset1974

someone please give me info regarding mpls on v7.1rc1, is it works nicely or something?

thx

buset1974

i've problem reported around 2015 regarding CCR such as (randomly rebooting, ospf NSSA routing, BGP). Mikrotik allway said, it will be fixed on v7 And Now in 2021, the v7 still not sure when it will release and it's still not sure that it will be stable yet? A lot of people depend their business on ...

buset1974

anyone 've try mpls? i've create this simple lab with 4 routers connected each other making a ring/ loop: first step: OSPF successful created and each router can ping each router loopback. second step: MPLS activated and problem happen, each router have spesific problem with some router, they can no...

buset1974

I'm a bit disappointed, would like to see more focus on stability and features that not in V7 but are available in V6 instead of brand new features.

agree, make stable and release it.

buset1974

"error while running customized default configuration script: expected end of command (line 1337 column 53)"

buset1974

*) upgrade - fixed space handling in package file names;

system auto-upgrade still broken.

thx

buset1974

still having problem with /system autoupgrade
works fine in long-term version 6.45.9

thx

buset1974

hgh cpu show in profile.(CCR1009) so many unclassified 100% cpu [admin@MikroTik-Lab-01] > /tool/profile freeze-frame-interval=1 cpu=all Columns: NAME, CPU, USAGE NAME C USAGE unclassified 0 100% cpu0 100% console 1 0% networking 1 0.5% winbox 1 0% management 1 1% telnet 1 0% unclassified 1 98.5% cpu...

buset1974

on 6.47
system - auto-upgrade still problem since 6.46 please fix it.
i've report this many times.

thx

buset1974

any new regarding system-auto-upgrade that has been broken since 6.46?
it's working fine on long-term version 6.45.9

thx

buset1974

System->auto-upgrade, still problem, can not display available routeros from ftp source !!
Please fix it, it broken after 6.45.7

thx

buset1974

System - auto-upgrade broken since 6.46.1 please fix it.

thx

up, still broken

buset1974

System - auto-upgrade broken since 6.46.1 please fix it.

thx

buset1974

anyone can explain what exactly improve on this

*) system - correctly handle Generic Receive Offloading (GRO) for MPLS traffic;

i 'am having ping rapid random timeout on vpls, hope the improvement can fix the problem.

thx

buset1974

Hello,

i need help,
winbox + wine did not work after upgrading my mac to catalina.

I also tried winbox64.exe and the result also the same.

anyone can help me and shared how to fix it or i there any change that mikrotik will released winbox for mac?

thx

buset1974

system->auto-upgrade was broke starting 6.46 til 6.46.1 please fix it

buset1974

I can not upgrade hAP lite - not enough space. I got around it by manually updating only selected packages, rather than the whole package. Basically I downloaded the SMIPS Extra Packages ZIP file on my PC, extracted it and then only uploaded the packages I actually needed to the device, which were ...

buset1974

Dear Mikrotik, When are you going to start testing your releases? I'm guessing never, since that would be a huge workflow change internally. When I see this in the patch notes "*) ospf - fixed possible busy loop condition when accessing OSPF LSAs;" and my routers are experiencing that pro...

buset1974

Cannot upgrade HAP lite series

thx

buset1974

joserudi - Please send supout file to support@mikrotik.com. Generate file while the problem is present and name at least single user which does not get rate-limit; LeftyTs, Ulypka, gepelbaum, nostromog, CharlyBrown, xtrans - Please send supout file to support@mikrotik.com. Generate file while the p...

buset1974

having problem upgrading hAP lite to 6.45.1 from 6.44.2

"system, error not enough space for upgrade."

thx

Search found 245 matches