You need to give your router's bridge interface an IP from the prefix pool:I found several discussions about IPv6 within this forum but still I'm unable to figure out how to properly configure it and make it work.
/ipv6 address add address=::1 from-pool=my-ipv6-pool-1 interface=bridge
Check /ipv6/settings in CLI to see if disable-ipv6 is set to "yes".I cannot find ipv6 link local address in any ipv6 interface. Rebooting doesn't help too.
I can reproduce the tcp/564 connection on my own RouterOS 7 device here. I agree with the OP that RouterOS 7 devices do appear to be listening on that port.2000 is the btest server.
are you testing using nmap on the same the same subnet, or traversing another device?
I was actually replying to networkmonkey - I'm afraid I don't know anything about Huawei equipment, never used it, so I have no idea what you want to do.Will try Thanks!
Are you sure three tries is enough to properly test it? When I see your screenshots above, I see that you had problems resolving facebook on the fourth try but the first three were OK. But you are sure the CCR is OK after three tries?I got as like below image
This answer makes no sense. Do you mean you are only using PCs on that VLAN? I don’t know what you mean by “on DHCP”.On DHCP im using direct PC's only.
You’ll need to also check “other configuration” box if you want Windows to get DNS server addresses from DHCPV6 server on MikroTik. If they don’t get DNS v6 after that then you have not added DHCPv6 server for that specific network.This what i did in the IPv6->ND
Have you added DHCPV6 server on that vlan? What neighbor discovery settings are configured on the mikrotik under ipv6-> ND?I have getting Valid IPv6 IP and getting Fe80::... gateway, But not able to get IPv6 DNS,
Can’t you just replace the TPlink devices? Or upgrade them to fix it? Disabling DHCPV6 is not a good solution, IPV6 with manual config is too much work.That issue got TP-LINK routers DUID new each time ...
I've disable DHCPv6 becouse of that ...
I wonder if this might work?Has anyone tried some sort of shielding for these AP's yet?
Seems like with 60GHz it would be more effectively shielded given the beam width?
FYI we have tested this on our devices - DHCP relay is working fine for us on 6.44.5.I got problem with dhcp-relay , after upgrade my client cannot get address.
Now I downgrade to version 6.43.16 it work fine.
Possibly, but that would be a really strange setup. It is very unusual to establish OSPF neighbor with another ISP. You would typically use BGP in this role.Can you run two instances of OSPF between the same two routers (with multiple loopback addresses, etc) and make this work?
You might be able to do this with BGP, depending on your topology.Any other option? Another routing protocol? multiple OSPF instances perhaps?
Yes, exactly. Also as an ISP it makes sense to allow most (if not all) ICMP - it makes troubleshooting much easier.So, other 'regular' traffic should pass then, correct? Unless it's specifically blocked in the firewall of one of the routers. Correct?
Add two firewall rules to allow all ICMP on input and forward chains and move them to the top of the list on all three routers, then try the ping again.I've typed /24 too many times. Yes, it's 0.0.0.0/0 on all routers.
Yes it does - why would it not?Really? Will this work without intetnet? Cos i've tried a few hotspot guides from here but most requires internet connection to work properly.
What radios are you using?I don't find any good document about it, if is possible get some help that how can I configure it.
I don't have any QOS or priority configuration on routers / links.
I think what you want is PCQ - please see: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Q ... Q_Examplesit will effect only connection limit?? then what will i do for bandwidth limit???
This is excellent news - does this also work with DHCPv6 servers over PPP (ex. PPPoE)?*) dhcpv6-server - added RADIUS accounting support;
can you run /ip route export and paste the results? And the same for /ip route print?I will try a config reset later on Router 1. For the time being it's working in the opposite traffic flow.