Yes, Mikrotik, thank you! This was needed for so long.*) mpls - added MPLS mangle support;
That's been showing up that way for a while and isn't related specifically to this beta.Why in IPv6 DHCP server POOL option do I get a double static-only entry's listed:
If I recall correctly the CRS317 supported MPLS hardware offload when acting as a P router in RouterOS v6. I'm not sure if this has been brought to v7 yet.What MPLS Hardware functionality was in RouterOS v6 that is not in v7 ?
This does not seem to be working - I do not see this route either in the Winbox GUI or the CLI.*) route - fixed IPv6 default route presence when received from RA;
Yes, there is no need for a public IP for it. You can be behind multiple levels of NAT and it will still work.Hi, coul I use ZTT without public IP address?
For me, I see the actual interface under bridge->hosts on an RB4011 and Audience in 7.7 with wifiwave2.Is this expected behaviour?
Firewall filter? or route filters?the 7,7rc1 in our case (more then 5M routes) freezes when modify a filter rule.
Not at the moment, anyway. What is the reason you want to run RouterOS inside RouterOS? Usually people who wanted Metarouter did because they wanted to do something that you could only do in OpenWRT and not RouterOS.Hmmm, alright. Can I run another instance of RouterOS in a docker container?
No, I have not tried it yet, unfortunately, these are a crazy few weeks for me.Did you try it? It does not work for me (set priority from DSCP)...
Are you wanting to use a mipsbe device for wifiwave2-capsman or something?That leaves out A LOT of devices then ...
I think the reason that we don't see this is that the one CCR2004 model that can run RouterOS v6 has been shown to be unstable, with random reboots every few weeks, and they were unable to fix this without v7.If ROSv7 is still not ready please allow ROSv6 in CCR2004 and 2216 hardwares...
It has not been completely fixed, as this issue happened to me on a 6.49.6 -> 7.4 upgrade.Apparently it's been fixed in 7.4
Mikrotik this morning sent me an internal test version and it has fixed my issue - no more VPLS crash.Same trouble. mipsbe
As it says in the changelog, it is only available from the CLI at the moment, not Winbox.Are you seeing the 2.5Gbps speed option on the SFP+ port when you disable auto negotiation?
I upgraded the CRS309 to 7.3beta37, and 2.5Gbps option isn't available.
Winbox isn't really natively for Linux, but it is fully tested on wine in each release.I just noticed you have Winbox for Linux, I didn't know that, and I will thus give it a try.
7.1 isn't really long term. It is just there as a dummy placeholder until there is an actual long term v7.Strange that 7.1.3 is stable and 7.1 is long term :)
Why do you need bridge vlan filtering on the cAP ac in the first place? In most situations for APs there is no benefit, and instead it is just a make-work thing, by forcing you to configure many VLANs by hand.I set up an CAPsMAN (CAPac) with Local Forwarding and VLAN-Filtering.
https://bird.network.cz/doc/bird-5.htmlWhat is bird syntax?
No, I believe in another thread they have said that once there is a true long-term channel release of v7, after that point v6 development will completely end, no updates.I thought some devices will never be able to use 7 so 6 was intended to be maintained for the foreseeable future?
I suspect the same thing - with all the excitement around v7, somebody possibly forgot that 6.49.3 stable was never actually posted.Or some forgot that it was done :)
Yes there is, but not in /routing/filters. The option is under bgp, in "input.accept-nlri".Isn't there an option to get only one prefix without any others in memory?
This is fixed in 7.2rc2.+ export not working, wait almost forever and the result is nothing
+ Make supout.rif stop at 85%
I wouldn't be surprised if they used Electron, because then they could revamp webfig at the same time and use much of the same code for both. The other way would be to use some popular framework like Qt.What if we end up with some Electron-based monstrosity or something?
It might be fixed then - is that with connection tracking? i.e. do you have an IPv6 allow established,related firewall rule that is working correctly with that queue in place?That was the test I performed. IPv6 + simple queue using the interface as a target works on 7.2rc3 and CCR2116
Dropped a lot compared to what? 7.1.1?Internet speed through wi-fi dropped a lot
viewtopic.php?p=901944#p901944Source on this?
No, it isn't doing this. I'm not sure how to fix it with a script, it may be possible. This is something I hope they will fix soon in RouterOS v7.Is RouterOS sending an RA with a lifetime of 0 when the prefix changes? Or is there some way to do it with a script?
Probably you should report this via their support system. In the meantime, you can probably work around this with a mangle rule to get the same result.Still doesn't work with above configuration (first post).
The dude is not available yet on v7, that is why it is failing for you.I don't think I installed anything extra other than dude.
They haven't removed the setting yet. It is now a dummy setting, the only thing it does is disables fast path, and there is already a check box for disabling fast path.Then why is ip route cache option present in ip>setting?
This is not the case - fasttrack only works in situations where bridge VLAN filtering is not hardware offloaded.Fasttrack has nothing to do with bridge vlan filtering.
Yes, use no-mark for the parent, and remove any mangle rules that apply any mark other than no-mark. And, yes, cake is aware of the dscp rule from mangle.What packet mark do put for the parent queue ? no-mark ? is cake aware of the dscp value from mangle ?
I'm sure they will add defaults for those later. They probably do not consider it to be urgent at this time, and are focusing on fixing a lot of bugs instead of dealing with minor things like this.That's not the question, I see it listed among the types. I'm curious why it's not being used..
If you are doing VLAN, routing, basic firewall, you can probably use 7.1.1 on them to fix the reboots.On two CCR2004 we have experimented two watchdog reboot, all have 6.49.2,
I have looked at Preseem, but it is a non-starter for us because of its complete lack of MPLS support.For inspiration in general I recommend looking over how preseem does things.
This only impacts using cake with a simple queue shaper. It works fine with IPv6 when using queue trees instead or interface queues.ipv6 and these queue types have issues documented here viewtopic.php?t=181705
I don't fully understand what you mean here as IPv6 is working in 7.1.1. There are some issues or things not implemented yet, but none of those qualify as IPv6 "not working"1) Can someone confirm that 7.2 perhaps has a working ipv6?
