MikroTik

This can be done from RouterOS as well. Make simple Arduino||STM32 board with temperature sensor attached (DHT22 for example), that listens to serial input and answers with sensor data. In RouterOS if serial device is attached - disabled ppp-client is created. Make simple script, that does at-chat t...

thanks for reply. but it's not working

What device are you using? Is reset button acting as WPS button on this device as well?

system routerboard reset-button set on-event=??????
OK. now how to set event ?

Update: event on scripts must be entered.

wiki is also updated:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:R ... et_buttons

Cabling also adds Voltage drop

Please make sure that you are using latest software releases - there a lot of quality improvements between older and newer software versions.
Alignment LEDs should be followed when alignment mode is on:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1

/interface lte at-chat lte input="AT+COPS\?"
should give back active PLMN

Unfortunately this is not supported on US modems

this feature is currently not available for US modems

bounding with active backup will switch over in less than 0.3 seconds if 60GHz link is lost

Currently only MikroTik to MikroTik communication is supported.

Well I'm out of ideas. Try a different channel? The 23% packet error rate isn't great. Still makes me think the signal's too hot. @antons? Signal may be too hot, but in this case it seems that this is caused somewhere else. Is there any other devices in between PCs and Wireless Wire dishes? My firs...

please add multiple parallel streams with -P option, for UDP, you have to set transfer speed as well.

Btest is limited by device resources. Please run Btest on other, powerfull devices through created 60GHz link

Disable station roaming from wireless options. And/Or use connect list to connect to specific MAC address.

While Terragraph is still in development - Similar networks can be already made by using our devices, as explained by Attila Bologh in MUM Hungary 2019 https://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/HU19/presentation_6777_1559506180.pdf This approach is a bit different - currently unavailable feature of AP ...

max L2MTU for w60g is 7882

could you please post configuration from both sides of the link?

please paste output from:
/interface w60g export hide-sensitive

Those are capabilities not supported by this modem.

Intel wireless adapters are not supported under RouterOS

I have a MIKRO TIK RBwAPG-60ad KIT.

Data is only updated when beamforming is working - we will fix this in upcoming versions

In 50m distance - there will be no issues getting full speed in all weather conditions

please make sure that you are using latest RouterOS versions. Btest has gone from single core process to multicore.

Hi All,

so disappointed with Mikrotik, after those years and ...

Looks like wrong baud rate.

Thanks Great and Easy but a couple other questions. 1. Devices are in transparent bridge (Layer 2) mode - this won't cause any issues, by exception if you are using same 192.168.88.0/24 network and trying to access the devices. To access the devices set correct IP addresse to the bridge interface. ...

Hello, most of the tests are done by using internal traffic generating tool - bandwidth test. This tool runs on internal device resources - and before latest updates utilized only one core of 4 core ARM CPU. With latest RouterOS releases this test runs on all cores, but we still recommend testing by...

please show us exactly how are you testing this. We get full speed on much higher distances by using same testing tools.
make sure that testing PCs has enough power, if possible run test in multi core mode, use multiple streams as well.

out of box devices are configured as transparent bridge (think of them as replacing existing cable). Addresses are static and you won't be able to access devices by using IP address if you are not in same subnet (traffic will still be passed through this wireless bridge). Other than that everything ...

we try alignment many times but this is best, why rssi not below -49... whats your suggestions for this distance ?

Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?

how can fixed it

frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.

All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable... what exactly is not stable? thank you for replay when test it it put frequency=auto and no connection ?? what you think about it "auto" does not include 66000...

Hello. We have a strange problem. We made a PtMP on wAP 60G (v6.44beta40) with 5 clients (4 LHG and 1 wAP same ROS version). Everything is working fine, but when anyone will shutdown MT (or reboot it) then we get disconnect on all stations and they don't want to connect again. We have to manually d...

please send supout.rif files from both of the devices to support@mikrotik.com

this issue will be addressed in upcoming releases (already fixed in beta70 - that will be released in upcoming days)

Hi, Im using a R11e-LTE in which im trying to use the cell locking feature in the newest os V6.44. However, i cannot send a AT chat command while the modem is in use and if i reset the modem the cell lock is removed as noted by the wiki. https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/LTE#Using_Cel...

LEDs in your picture show that it's still connected

Where can one find the new snmp values ? "snmp - added "tx-ccq" ("mtxrWlStatTxCCQ") and "rx-ccq" ("mtxrWlStatRxCCQ") values;" Its not listen under "interface wireless" or "interface wireless registration-tabel". Checked both Ap and Client with print oid. Thank you for reporting this, there is a bug...

Rack "ears" can only be attached to non wireless version.

Add APN profile selection line together with changing SIM slot line:

/interface lte set lte1 apn-profiles=...

6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices

Would it not be better to recommend 6.43.7 stable that would have all the RC stuff inn it?

Does this looks like suggesting older versions?

Are you running latest RouterOS versions?

Similar issues was fixed some time ago:

6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices

Are you running latest RouterOS versions?

Multithread support for btest is already added:
Version 6.44beta39 has been released.
*) btest - added multithreading support for both UDP and TCP tests;

If you are using Wireless Wire kit - devices are pre-configured as transparent bridge and this usage case will work without any extra configuration.
In your case devices has not linked together, check if power is supplied to both of them.

Scan without sending out probe requests from device running passive scan.

is there any snow on front cover? Maybe device has alignment problems?

Finally test uses all cores of the routerboard... Have you checked BTest? MT Staff: why create speed-test? You already have BTest - develop it! :) I gave up on btest long time ago, and iperf is not always possible :( Please read carefully through change log: *) btest - added multithreading support ...

Yup also using the latest beta. On two separate links of +-1800m and 2000m cannot even make a single link. Using 64800 and 66000. You would think after aiming for a while there would at least be a connection - a bad one at least. please check if scan-list on "station-bridge" device includes frequen...

Thank you for reporting this - this Quickset issue will be fixed in upcoming releases. Currently you can change address from IP menu

66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!

Not exactly true -

connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AF:D3:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -57
distance: 2409.94m

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:S ... leshooting

Hello,
Is this issue reproducible in latest beta version?

Each version of RouterOS includes a lot of changes, it would help us, if you write versions you are using.

What RouterOS version are you using? Are you moving open Winbox screen around? Do you have stable connection to the device you are monitoring?

First five to ten minutes device is "learning" - there will be some drops in traffic during this period. We would recommend testing with traffic generated outside testing system (BTest is not the best tool to be used on device under test) If this issue repeats please send us supout.rif file while ru...

Anyone care to share with the less enlightened how exactly you go about enabling it in the CLI, and which beta version of the software you have to use? Is it under interface/wireless/channels/add?? On station make sure that frequency-list (or scan-list depending on used RouterOS version) includes d...

yes, align mode currently is only in latest beta versions.

upgrade you wAP60G devices and performance will be similar.

please provide versions used on those links and make sure you are running latest ones - there a lot of changes and improvements in latest releases. Antonsb latest FW 6.43.4 is not usable during the alignment the RSSI value update after several seconds (>30) or it don't update, I wasted 3 hours befo...

New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1

please provide versions used on those links and make sure you are running latest ones - there a lot of changes and improvements in latest releases.

Form supout.rif files - RSSI signal on one side is way off. Latest beta version includes align mode - for easier alignment. it would help us improve, if we get some user feedback. To use align mode run on both sides: /interface w60g align wlan60-1 RSSI and sector information will change rapidly, adj...

Hello,
Those signal levels are too low for such distance.
What RouterOS version are you using? Are the dishes perfectly aligned?
Can you please send us supout.rif files from both sides to support@mikrotik.com ?

66000 GHz is non standard freq for this band? Will You implement 66960 GHz and 69120 GHz?

it's not a standard channel

typo of 66GHz

Much higher distances are available by using 64800 and 66000 MHz frequencies

please provide us more detailed info and send a support output file to support@mikrotik.com What wireless protocol you are using? How are you testing the speed/capacity? How often do you see this problem? I am using 802.11 speed/capacity - just looking on winbox and pinging other side. MKs are link...

All 60GHz devices in AP mode currently supports up to 8 clients.

*) wireless - improved stability for 802.11ac;
Any description of improve? Thanks

This fix should provide better rate selection at higher rates and at higher load.

Can we get access for this link or similar with such issue to run some tests and debug?
Please write to support@mikrotik.com

4th channel should be much better in this distance

We fixed firmware instability when signal was too strong, latest versions should work without need to limit power output.

Dang! I think you won a certain type of silicon lottery! We have 750m link at ~-50dBm signal. Yours at 1km more should see an additional ~-22dBm fade over ours so expected would be -72. I wonder, if you found the magical beamforming TX sector. Because in reality we took down an ML2.5 link which was...

what about paramiko? import paramiko ssh = paramiko.SSHClient() ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy()) ssh.connect('192.168.88.1', port=22, username='admin', password='') stdin, stdout, stderr = client.exec_command('export') for line in stdout: print(line.strip('\n')) client.close...

this will be fixed in next Release Candidate version, sorry for caused inconvenience

please write to us: support@mikrotik.com

USB wireless devices are not supported and only Atheros based wireless chipsets are supported under RouterOS,

Here is my results from a 700m connection in good weather. It seems the rssi improved and the link was more balanced after putting load on the link. I also expected more throughput at that distance. LinkTest700m.png Currently You are testing one core performance - Use Traffic generator or generate ...

results

Test with external tool or Traffic-generator and You will get full Wire speed

LEDs currently are in fact miss-leading - we will address this in future releases.

known issue on RPI3 and RPIzeroW:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/issues/839

if You have SNMP active on other device You can use snmp-get feature from RouterOS:
/tool snmp-get address=192.168.88.1 oid=.1.3.6.1.2....

Signal levels are very low for such distance, is line of sight clear? Please check if this repeats with latest current and RC versions. as a side note - antenna-gain value is used for limiting power output. By setting higher value into antenna-gain field TX-power will be adjusted accordingly to matc...

Interface is not disabled because it's probably dynamic, try setting them as static under provisioning:
/caps-man provisioning set [find] action=create-enabled

We checked this issue one more time and we found out that default stack of 7600e lte card USB emulation takes up 17 USB endpoints from available 32, so coexistence of 2 cards is impossible in default working modes. However - Current RC release have additional PID 901b added for this card (custom fir...

I've upgraded WAP60g in ptmp scenario 2xapc - distance 170mtr wap60 and 270mtr - lhg60 before was 43rc17, jitter was quite ugly some ping went to 170ms but more or less stable, after I've upgraded all to 42.5 I got better MCS, but devices disconnects every few hours, worse is they dont came back in...

wAP60G 240m link updated from rc32 to rc42, client not connecting any more in scan see signal but not connecting, back to 6.42.5 it is working again, but seem to me it is not stable as has been in 6.42.1. Also please check scan for frequency 64800 seems to me it is not scanning that frequency when ...

x86 has very limited USB3.0 support, it will probably work only in 2.0 mode.

*) w60g - general stability and performance improvements; Ticket#2018062622003837 For me, 6.42.5 made w60g less stable (6.43rc34 has the same issues too) than 6.42.4. Wireless Wire Dish kit, 208 m PtP link, testing with UDP 300Mbps/600Mbps btest for many hours, new versions randomly disconnect abou...

Up!

/tool sms set port=lte1

Update 6.42.5: *) w60g - added 4th 802.11ad channel (CLI only); *) w60g - added distance measurement; *) w60g - general stability and performance improvements; *) w60g - improved maximum achievable distance; *) w60g - properly report center status under "tx-sector-info"; Only seeing MCS 8 again. Wh...

Please drop us an e-mail to support@mikrotik.com

Even from screenshots we can see that You can align it more precisely tx-sector-info should show 0.2 on both planes, or "Centre" if You are using latest RC
On sunny day You should get full speed on this link.

IP address is added automatically and DHCP configuration is moved to - /interface lte apn

I am still experiencing a problem with the WAP60 on this firmware. Both client & AP running latest release. Client connects when ap set to bridge. However when AP set to ap-bridge same client will not connect. No matter which frequency is selected (even the new 64800) Do You have level4 license on ...

Can somebody please recommend stable SW for wireless wire wAP60G ? I have tried many but all are unstable ? (jam after couple of days = hard reset is necessary). It is probably linked with hot weather ... Thank you.

Please provide more details to support@mikrotik.com

1) distance mesurement in CLI is here since rc19. Has it been improved somehow? Or what is the difference? 3) what is the new maximum link distance for WAP60 and LHG60? 2) I have a 10 meters long test link between 2 LHG60s (YES, I know it too little for LHG60 and can be clearly solved by wireless w...

This picture of QMP should explain this better:
https://img.routerboard.com/mimg/1445_l.jpg

water on radome cover will affect link quality a lot more than water covering parabolic dish.

PTMP improvements will be added in upcoming versions.

This will be fixed in next RC version

As I just read about new chipsets for Smartphones with 802.11ad Support. Think about a new room with 200 students. - In the ceiling there will 9 double sockets with RJ45 - I'll add 9x cAP AC to those with lowered sending power... - I will also have some RJ45 sockets. Ist WAP 60G meant to work like ...

We are still working on distance improvements - but we had made connections even on 2.4 km distances (weather condition needs to be excellent and it works only on 4th channel).
Currently we recommend to stick to 1.5km for stability reasons.

Please keep in mind that stated 1.5km range is with including weather factors.

thank You for reporting this, we will look into it.

You can't downgrade to version lower than factory installed version.

E-Band like Siklu ETH v1200 works at 2500meters at 76GHz!!!.. 16GHz difference and only 500MHz width! WirelessRudy - do you have in Spain the Snowy days? :P If yes the standard LHG60 doesnt work :P That's why the first links are in Hawaii where there will never be snow... IgniteNet ML-60-35 is ok m...

there is sniffer feature for capturing packets:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:I ... ss#Sniffer

Please upgrade Your router to latest RouterOS version - there are various fixes in place for issues like this.

Please downgrade to 6.43rc17, fixes for this will be available soon

new version will have distance measurement tool, it would be cool if we could get some feedback to support@mikrotik.com

Snow and rain does not affect link that much. There will be some added attention but link will still stay up. 5GHz backup in most cases is unnecessary. even not if we go to the Limit of 60 Ghz Range, look at Ignite.... Take a look to the Sector and to the Client Device.... That is the way we need, ...

WHAT? "LEDS show you"?? Meaning they tell me to; "go left", or "go right"? "Go up", or "go down"??

Exactly, depending on used beam-forming pattern LHG can tell you where to turn it. LED sticker comes with small arrows and device "blinks you to the right direction"

Snow and rain does not affect link that much. There will be some added attention but link will still stay up. 5GHz backup in most cases is unnecessary.

Hello MikroTik team, could you please provide more details - what performance improvements have been done, what is the new maximal achievable distance and what exactly is distance lock? Thank you in advance. Love it! Wireless Wire keeps getting better. What's "distance lock" though? Distance was li...

wAP60 has a specially designed and calibrated beamforming antenna with pre-configured patterns. you can't use it with custom antennas and I am surprised it works for you at all. OK, and how is this with LHG 60? On bigger distances 'non' beamforming 60Ghz devices are very hard to align. How is this ...

Try to switch used frequency to 58320 and upgrade to 6.42.1 why should I change freq? It seems to work quite good with rc52. there is no noise or other 60ghz link visible under scan. besides if it works worse with newer routerOS I doubt Your advice is to solve problem looks rather as a workaround. ...

Try to switch used frequency to 58320 and upgrade to 6.42.1

How far is the link? Please provide CLI output from both ends:
/interface w60g monitor wlan60-1

we have custom made antennas on WAP and on 1km test link it has 4dBi less then LHG60 on the same link. 500m link still drops with heavy rain. 420m is rock solid.

Custom antennas will never work as well without proper calibration.

I read the orther thread and If i remember well the link drop during heavy rain at 1200m :-) That link drop was due to misalignment and multiple devices squeezed close together with self made solutions. There are clever LED alignment option added to those devices that helps to find best position. W...

I read the orther thread and If i remember well the link drop during heavy rain at 1200m :-) That link drop was due to misalignment and multiple devices squeezed close together with self made solutions. There are clever LED alignment option added to those devices that helps to find best position. W...

Good results but in rainy days? The US version has the same power outpu of EU?

Same power output.
In other forum threads there are results from rainy days as well. Rain adds some attenuation but if link is set up correctly there shouldn't be any issues in those distances.

After update to 6.43rc11 My Kodi player on Raspberry could't connect to Synology NAS via NFS or SMB!

Please provide more information about this issue to support@mikrotik.com

This does not sound very plausible, there is something clearly wrong with the devices or with configuration. Please contact support and let us help you solve this issue.

Those are real field tests

wAP 60G should be used as the central unit and multiple LHG60G as clients. With a single connected client, in this scenario, we could reach distances over 900 m, but for stability, we recommend not to exceed 700 m. We are still working on those units and hopefully, there will be even more improvemen...

You can also use combo of wAP60G as AP and multiple LHG60G as CPE. I have posted a table of distances in other thread, but You can expect full speed at distances close to 700 m.

RBLHGG-60ad kit has larger antenna and will provide distance up to 1500 m. Maybe this is suitable for Your needs?
In future we plan to expand 60GHz lineup.

not exactly with 50m step, but may be helpful:

Distance, wAP RSSI, LHG60 RSSI, Throughput

300 m -63 -68 1.8Gbps+

500 m -63 -67 1.8Gbps+

700 m -66 -68 1.5Gbps

800 m -68 -69 1.2Gbps

850 m -68 -69 800Mbps

900 m -70 -72 Less than 100Mbps

They have a longer range unit now, the "Dish" version. Of course it's the antenna what makes the difference. But that will only be suited to point to point links. I guess one of those "Dish" units used as CPE would get a much longer range than 200 m connecting to a w60AP unit. As CPE they will go f...

300 meter stable connection currently is impossible with this device.

Yes, this is total throughput (TX+RX)

Were testing 6.42.1 2G is terrible (10-15mb) unless you use 20/40 (60+) This is across devices. Terrible waste of spectrum when all you need is a stable 30m Most of our customers have our 30 synchronous (3030 i get me hands dirty) Huge bonus points is you can name the artist :) 5 or 6 all in an apa...

LHG to wAP
Currently working at about 800 meters with 1.2 Gbps+ throughput
Full speed a bit under 700 meters. Distance depends on altitude and humidity levels.

It will work on higher distances, soon we will update this topic with test results.

Please contact us at support@mikrotik.com and include supout.rif file

With static addresses on Arch Linux KERNEL: Linux 4.16.4-1, No issues at all.
You can try to launch wine under different wine prefix:
WINEPREFIX=~/.winbox wine winbox.exe

For all WAP60g users please Mikrotik to explain the TX-sector numbers. For use of PtMP or colocation, it would be very useful to know the angles and directions of radiation. Please also add the option to modify the RX sector or turn off the beamforming routine. Thanks Explanation is already availab...

WHY?: when selected in "5GHz-only-N", rate to "default", HT-selected both chains, so WHY clients still connecting sometimes at 5GHz "A" rates, for instance 6Mbps. Is it any bug, that RouteOS still enable to connect with "A" rates? Wireless monitors sometimes report management rates instead of actua...

Please try to compare SMB results with cable to check if it's not limited somewhere else.
For iperf3 please add -P 10 flag at the end of command to run several parallel streams

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=133420&p=657196#p657196

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=133420&p=657196#p657196

That we know. What we would like to know from mikrotik is if it worths to test the wifi on hap ac2 with this RC or not.

Next RC release will have possible fix for this

The Bandwith test from AP1 to AP2

There is Your problem - run traffic through the created link. Generating traffic takes a lot of resources.

Are data rates reaching maximal supported by devices? About Lenovo P2 - no questions. But I'm not sure that Xiaomi Mi Max 2, with the manufacturer's support for MU-MIMO gives out a maximum. If I'm wrong, correct it. This device is factory locked to 20MHz channels, to get more throughput you have to...

Your phone is already working on max rate, this limitation in Your phone hardware.

Are data rates reaching maximal supported by devices?

6.43rc3

*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices;
Please upgrade and test - fixes soon will be included in current releases as well

6.43rc3

*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices;

This includes XIAOMI devices. Please upgrade and test - fixes soon will be included in current releases as well

Ap-bridge mode should be fixed in latest current and RC releases.

Upgraded also the Firmware of the R11e-LTE from v007 to v008...
Some details on how you got/did that update?

Write to support for more information. There is no practical need for upgrade from v007 to v008

Just a heads up, I had an issue with 6.42rc56 on a multipoint (ap-bridge) AP. Interfaces weren't showing up and the station wasn't connecting. I switched to bridge mode and everything worked again. Really digging the rssi and tx-sector-info, but I don't think it's ready for ap-bridge mode yet. We a...

RC releases will show more information on aligment by using sector calibration inforation There are T/Rx-sector items in interface w60g monitor 0 once command output.Anybody know what this last two lines exactly means? connected: yes frequency: 60480 remote-address: 30:07:4D:81:D0:B6 mcs: 8 signal: ...

I installed rc49 on a few of our >100m links (PtP and PtMP) and neither MCS or Signal Quality have changed. Throughput seems better, though, as running a traffic generator over our longest link (160m?) nets a solid 500Mbps full-duplex with little fluctuation. Used to be all over the place. Seeing a...

Is there any supout.rif saved files before upgrade was done? If yes, please write to support@mikrotik.com

What about CRS326-24G-2S+RM rack mount unit? Yes it's bigger but it has more to offer with 24 Gigabit ports and 2 SFP+ ports.
Upgraded, more powerful hardware for lower price.

Please read previous posts testing. Bandwidth test runs on one core, currently You are testing one core packet generation performance, not link throughput.

I was wandering if someone have any routerboard with dual sim slots and wifi 2.4 (prefer dual band 2.4/5ghz, but can be whithout). I need it for wifi hotspot project for tourist busses. I found the RBM33G, but it has no wifi cards. You can use M33G with 1 x mPCIe modem and 1x USB modem + Wireless c...

Normis the antenna beamforming is only in the horizontal plane or also in the vertical plane?

It works on both planes

We have placed a link test the distance is 101 meters the link is dropped 4 time in 3 days with light rain. We have a meteo station close to the installation that measured 23mm/hour of rain.during last drop. With no rain the singnal is 80 Please upgrade to latest version to support rates under MCS4...

RB411U has no power-reset implamented.
Only workaround i could think of is using serial port controled relay.
Or by using device with controled USB power-reset function:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:U ... _port_type

Isn't this modem avalivable only in m.2 size factor? 411 has miniPCIe slot.

There is different command set on R11e-LTE cards. Currently we don't have complete reference guide published out yet.
Scan is running in background at all times, latest RC releases should print some usefull info in logs.

We made some lab tests and the maximum clients allowed is 8 in PtMP mode, I hope in the next future the possibility to have almost 16 or 32 more clients.

No info about LHG 60 that 'll be the killer solution for the PtMP mode.

Same rules currently applies to LHG60G.

wAP60G uses an complex algorithm to select best elements from patch array. With reflector it needs to be re calibrated to be able to work correctly.

Just got a pair. Link is +-30 meters, I am for some reason not able to get over MCS8 however the link is testing full duplex +-880mbps. This is truly awesome. Cannot wait for the LHG60 Currently MCS selection prefers MCS8, it should provide 940Mbps full duplex real life speeds. Latest RC and 6.41 w...

Is there anything blocking line of sight?

Any news on the LHG 60?

We really need those in our network

Wireless Wire is our first 60GHz product, LHG series will follow.
Please give this kit a chance - performance will pleasantly surprise You.

Hello, please upgrade to latest RC version, there are some fixes regwrding this issue.

hello,
looks like client device is stuck at 802.11g rates. please send us supout.rif file to:
support@mikrotik.com

Fasttrack does not work in 6.40.1 SXT LTE Can you see if the connections are marked as fasttrack? There is no fasttrack support for SXT LTE units yet! What's new in v6.40 (2017-Jul-21 08:45): !) lte - added initial fastpath support (except SXT LTE and Sierra modems); !) lte - added initial support ...

Hello,
Reset configuration:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Reset
and try to connect to the device using Wireless interface.

Hello,
Is there any log messages regarding wireless disconnection? Could You please enable wireless logging and check disconnection reason?
You can also run frequency-monitor to check frequency usage:
/interface wireless frequency-monitor wlan1

Hi. You mentioned that: " lte - added additional driver support for DWR-910" Is this mean that it support USB 4G Modem D-LINK DWR-910? How to set it up? I have such modem and when I connect it to hAP lite ac, it just show "Mobile Connect" in USB resource !! What can I do for make it work? this mode...

huawei lte modem me909s-120 in 6.40 stops data transfer every 10-20 mins, it is active, no warning logs but wan is down
the same modem worked fine on <= 6.39.2
Same behavior with an huawei e3372h usb stick
Downgraded to 6.38.7, which works fine.

Hello,
Should be fixed in 640RC6

Hi,
Please upgrade to latest RouterOS Release Candidate version and check if it improves Your situation.

Management frame protection only works between two MikroTik devices, there is no use for this option in CAPsMAN mode.

Are You running latest RouterOS version?

*) wireless - reduced load on CPU for high speed wireless links;
Can you elaborate on this? What types of links are benefited and by how much?

Reduced 802.11ac load on processor. This may reduce processor usage for other protocols too.

We will address this issue in next RC releases.

Antenna gain is actually used for decreasing total power output when running frequency-mode=regulatory domain.
Wireless chip will adjust power so tx-power output + antenna gain sum does not go out of regulatory domain limits.

Country settings are taken in account only if You are running frequency-mode=regulatory-domain. Antenna gain is for reducing power if You are under regulatory domain to match country selection EIRP. no_country_set matches FCC compliant set of power outputs / channels. For maximum output power set fr...

Please upgrade to latest RC ROS version and upgrade firmware too!
send us more suppout files:
support@mikrotik.com

Hi I have just tried 6.39rc7 on a RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN. A lot of client equipment seem to connect fine with or without encryption. Unfortunately, an old Intel 2200BG client cannot connect to it no matter if I use WPA2 encryption on it or not. To confirm that the Intel 2200BG card worked, I tested it ...

Enable advanced mode and check your tx-power settings and frequency mode. Please post all wireless settings:
/interface wireless export

Netinstall works emulated with sudo rights.
You can also setup TFTP server on other routerboard:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/TFTP
or on Linux system (I personally prefer ARCH Linux way of documentation):
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TFTP

post Your wireless configuration!

So the RB3011 to a wAP AC throughput at 8 feet looks right?
I have a ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+pc I could flip to if you think that would help???

Packets from wAPs wireless to ether are not going fasttrack yet because of CAPsMAN. Limiting factor is wAP CPU.

The PoE on Ether2 outputs approximately 2V below input voltage, and supports up to 0.5A
Max power consumption without PoE - 4W;
You can do math from here...

please post your wireless configuration.

Wireless speed/distance depends on client devices as well. For example : You can't expect 450Mbit rate on 2.4GHz client device with only one chain 20MHz radio. Please provide more information about client devices as well or try running simultaneous speed tests on more then 1 device at same time.

Hi, this is not related to fake devices in any way. There are two scenarios - update bug when cm2 wireless package is used and after update wireless has disapeared. In this case netinstall should get wireless back.
2nd scenario - bad unit. please contact reseller and get your replacement.

Post your wireless configuration:
/interface wireless export

Hi. Can anyone confirm if the ports on this device pass through PoE? I'd like to run 5 Ruckus APs on this device and I didn't want to purchase a separate PoE switch to do so if I don't need to. Also is this the model with the dual PSUs? Many thanks saltrock. Hello, CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ supports only P...

Please post your configuration. Is it in ap-bridge mode?

channel-width=20/40/80mhz-eeeC , change it to the channel-width=20/40/80mhz-Ceee

Hello! Are you sure your TP-link supports channel-width=5mhz?

please post your hAP ac lite configuration

ok, it is obvious. But I told about configuring at wirless device vlan, or it's impossible? Configuring VLAN avalible only switch?

"You can also transport VLANs over wireless links and put multiple VLAN interfaces on a single wireless interface."
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/VLAN

Please post your wireless configuration:
/interface wireless export
/interface wireless print

channel-width=20/40mhz-eC

set it to 20/40MHz-Ce, or even better to channel-width=20/40/80mhz-Ceee. Your devices don't understand non-standard center frequencies.

Check ip addreses on wireless interfaces add gateways

Set 1st Mikrotik to ap-bridge (or bridge if you don't need more than one client connected) and set 2nd in station mode.
Please check wiki before asking in forums:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Wireless_Setups
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Connect_t ... ss_Network

You are now running mANTBox cpu at 100%.
Generating traffic takes a lot of resources. Put a more powerful RB at the end of link (3011,1100.CCR series) or run traffic between two PCs on both ends.

Search found 202 matches