MikroTik

Intel wireless adapters are not supported under RouterOS

I have a MIKRO TIK RBwAPG-60ad KIT.

Data is only updated when beamforming is working - we will fix this in upcoming versions

In 50m distance - there will be no issues getting full speed in all weather conditions

please make sure that you are using latest RouterOS versions. Btest has gone from single core process to multicore.

Hi All,

so disappointed with Mikrotik, after those years and ...

Looks like wrong baud rate.

Thanks Great and Easy but a couple other questions. 1. Devices are in transparent bridge (Layer 2) mode - this won't cause any issues, by exception if you are using same 192.168.88.0/24 network and trying to access the devices. To access the devices set correct IP addresse to the bridge interface. ...

Hello, most of the tests are done by using internal traffic generating tool - bandwidth test. This tool runs on internal device resources - and before latest updates utilized only one core of 4 core ARM CPU. With latest RouterOS releases this test runs on all cores, but we still recommend testing by...

please show us exactly how are you testing this. We get full speed on much higher distances by using same testing tools.
make sure that testing PCs has enough power, if possible run test in multi core mode, use multiple streams as well.

out of box devices are configured as transparent bridge (think of them as replacing existing cable). Addresses are static and you won't be able to access devices by using IP address if you are not in same subnet (traffic will still be passed through this wireless bridge). Other than that everything ...

we try alignment many times but this is best, why rssi not below -49... whats your suggestions for this distance ?

Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?

how can fixed it

frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.

All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable... what exactly is not stable? thank you for replay when test it it put frequency=auto and no connection ?? what you think about it "auto" does not include 66000...

Hello. We have a strange problem. We made a PtMP on wAP 60G (v6.44beta40) with 5 clients (4 LHG and 1 wAP same ROS version). Everything is working fine, but when anyone will shutdown MT (or reboot it) then we get disconnect on all stations and they don't want to connect again. We have to manually d...

please send supout.rif files from both of the devices to support@mikrotik.com

this issue will be addressed in upcoming releases (already fixed in beta70 - that will be released in upcoming days)

Hi, Im using a R11e-LTE in which im trying to use the cell locking feature in the newest os V6.44. However, i cannot send a AT chat command while the modem is in use and if i reset the modem the cell lock is removed as noted by the wiki. https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/LTE#Using_Cel...

LEDs in your picture show that it's still connected

Where can one find the new snmp values ? "snmp - added "tx-ccq" ("mtxrWlStatTxCCQ") and "rx-ccq" ("mtxrWlStatRxCCQ") values;" Its not listen under "interface wireless" or "interface wireless registration-tabel". Checked both Ap and Client with print oid. Thank you for reporting this, there is a bug...

Rack "ears" can only be attached to non wireless version.

Add APN profile selection line together with changing SIM slot line:

/interface lte set lte1 apn-profiles=...

6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices

Would it not be better to recommend 6.43.7 stable that would have all the RC stuff inn it?

Does this looks like suggesting older versions?

Are you running latest RouterOS versions?

Similar issues was fixed some time ago:

6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices

Are you running latest RouterOS versions?

Multithread support for btest is already added:
Version 6.44beta39 has been released.
*) btest - added multithreading support for both UDP and TCP tests;

If you are using Wireless Wire kit - devices are pre-configured as transparent bridge and this usage case will work without any extra configuration.
In your case devices has not linked together, check if power is supplied to both of them.

Scan without sending out probe requests from device running passive scan.

is there any snow on front cover? Maybe device has alignment problems?

Finally test uses all cores of the routerboard... Have you checked BTest? MT Staff: why create speed-test? You already have BTest - develop it! :) I gave up on btest long time ago, and iperf is not always possible :( Please read carefully through change log: *) btest - added multithreading support ...

Yup also using the latest beta. On two separate links of +-1800m and 2000m cannot even make a single link. Using 64800 and 66000. You would think after aiming for a while there would at least be a connection - a bad one at least. please check if scan-list on "station-bridge" device includes frequen...

Thank you for reporting this - this Quickset issue will be fixed in upcoming releases. Currently you can change address from IP menu

66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!

Not exactly true -

connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AF:D3:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -57
distance: 2409.94m

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:S ... leshooting

Hello,
Is this issue reproducible in latest beta version?

Each version of RouterOS includes a lot of changes, it would help us, if you write versions you are using.

What RouterOS version are you using? Are you moving open Winbox screen around? Do you have stable connection to the device you are monitoring?

First five to ten minutes device is "learning" - there will be some drops in traffic during this period. We would recommend testing with traffic generated outside testing system (BTest is not the best tool to be used on device under test) If this issue repeats please send us supout.rif file while ru...

Anyone care to share with the less enlightened how exactly you go about enabling it in the CLI, and which beta version of the software you have to use? Is it under interface/wireless/channels/add?? On station make sure that frequency-list (or scan-list depending on used RouterOS version) includes d...

yes, align mode currently is only in latest beta versions.

upgrade you wAP60G devices and performance will be similar.

please provide versions used on those links and make sure you are running latest ones - there a lot of changes and improvements in latest releases. Antonsb latest FW 6.43.4 is not usable during the alignment the RSSI value update after several seconds (>30) or it don't update, I wasted 3 hours befo...

New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1

please provide versions used on those links and make sure you are running latest ones - there a lot of changes and improvements in latest releases.

Form supout.rif files - RSSI signal on one side is way off. Latest beta version includes align mode - for easier alignment. it would help us improve, if we get some user feedback. To use align mode run on both sides: /interface w60g align wlan60-1 RSSI and sector information will change rapidly, adj...

Hello,
Those signal levels are too low for such distance.
What RouterOS version are you using? Are the dishes perfectly aligned?
Can you please send us supout.rif files from both sides to support@mikrotik.com ?

66000 GHz is non standard freq for this band? Will You implement 66960 GHz and 69120 GHz?

it's not a standard channel

typo of 66GHz

Much higher distances are available by using 64800 and 66000 MHz frequencies

please provide us more detailed info and send a support output file to support@mikrotik.com What wireless protocol you are using? How are you testing the speed/capacity? How often do you see this problem? I am using 802.11 speed/capacity - just looking on winbox and pinging other side. MKs are link...

All 60GHz devices in AP mode currently supports up to 8 clients.

*) wireless - improved stability for 802.11ac;
Any description of improve? Thanks

This fix should provide better rate selection at higher rates and at higher load.

Can we get access for this link or similar with such issue to run some tests and debug?
Please write to support@mikrotik.com

4th channel should be much better in this distance

Search found 184 matches