official announcements will be released only after product will be closer to finishing stage.
Hardware and software currently is close to that point.
Yes for experimental purposes, that's why we used horizontal Ethernet gland. Please keep in mind that dish design has drain hole, that needs to be sealed if used like that.I have seen that NRAY can be mounted rotated 90° changing antenna polarization this can help with rain and colocation?
What device are you using? Is reset button acting as WPS button on this device as well?thanks for reply. but it's not working
wiki is also updated:OK. now how to set event ?system routerboard reset-button set on-event=??????
Update: event on scripts must be entered.
Data is only updated when beamforming is working - we will fix this in upcoming versionsI have a MIKRO TIK RBwAPG-60ad KIT.
Looks like wrong baud rate.Hi All,
so disappointed with Mikrotik, after those years and ...
please show us exactly how are you testing this. We get full speed on much higher distances by using same testing tools.
Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?we try alignment many times but this is best, why rssi not below -49... whats your suggestions for this distance ?
frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.how can fixed it
/interface lte set lte1 apn-profiles=...
Does this looks like suggesting older versions?6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices
Would it not be better to recommend 6.43.7 stable that would have all the RC stuff inn it?
Are you running latest RouterOS versions?
6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices
Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
it's not a standard channel66000 GHz is non standard freq for this band? Will You implement 66960 GHz and 69120 GHz?
This fix should provide better rate selection at higher rates and at higher load.Any description of improve? Thanks
*) wireless - improved stability for 802.11ac;
Test with external tool or Traffic-generator and You will get full Wire speedresults
Up!
/tool sms set port=lte1
Please provide more details to support@mikrotik.comCan somebody please recommend stable SW for wireless wire wAP60G ? I have tried many but all are unstable ? (jam after couple of days = hard reset is necessary). It is probably linked with hot weather ... Thank you.
Custom antennas will never work as well without proper calibration.we have custom made antennas on WAP and on 1km test link it has 4dBi less then LHG60 on the same link. 500m link still drops with heavy rain. 420m is rock solid.
Same power output.Good results but in rainy days? The US version has the same power outpu of EU?
Please provide more information about this issue to support@mikrotik.comAfter update to 6.43rc11 My Kodi player on Raspberry could't connect to Synology NAS via NFS or SMB!
Next RC release will have possible fix for thisThat we know. What we would like to know from mikrotik is if it worths to test the wifi on hap ac2 with this RC or not.
The Bandwith test from AP1 to AP2
Write to support for more information. There is no practical need for upgrade from v007 to v008Some details on how you got/did that update?Upgraded also the Firmware of the R11e-LTE from v007 to v008...
It works on both planesNormis the antenna beamforming is only in the horizontal plane or also in the vertical plane?
Same rules currently applies to LHG60G.We made some lab tests and the maximum clients allowed is 8 in PtMP mode, I hope in the next future the possibility to have almost 16 or 32 more clients.
No info about LHG 60 that 'll be the killer solution for the PtMP mode.
Wireless Wire is our first 60GHz product, LHG series will follow.Any news on the LHG 60?
We really need those in our network
Hello,Same behavior with an huawei e3372h usb stickhuawei lte modem me909s-120 in 6.40 stops data transfer every 10-20 mins, it is active, no warning logs but wan is down
the same modem worked fine on <= 6.39.2
Downgraded to 6.38.7, which works fine.
Reduced 802.11ac load on processor. This may reduce processor usage for other protocols too.Can you elaborate on this? What types of links are benefited and by how much?*) wireless - reduced load on CPU for high speed wireless links;
Packets from wAPs wireless to ether are not going fasttrack yet because of CAPsMAN. Limiting factor is wAP CPU.So the RB3011 to a wAP AC throughput at 8 feet looks right?
I have a ccr1009-8g-1s-1s+pc I could flip to if you think that would help???
set it to 20/40MHz-Ce, or even better to channel-width=20/40/80mhz-Ceee. Your devices don't understand non-standard center frequencies.channel-width=20/40mhz-eC