please explain this in more detail, and if possible provide steps how to repeat this, as i haven't seen such issue.Sometimes veth can be lost automatically.
You can. Configure it as regular wireguard on PC.i wish if i can do that with laptop
Done! Look under Tips and Tricks section.Can you please provide some instructions how to add dual-stack IPv4+IPv6 address to a container?
Thanks
dksoft
Thanks, we will look into this.Please, follow the steps below, then restart a container to reproduce error log messages we get.
add address=172.17.0.3/16,fd8d:5ad2:24:2::2/64 gateway=172.17.0.1 gateway6=fd8d:5ad2:24:2::1
system/routerboard/usb/power-reset duration=5
Fix is included in upcoming betaThanks! Well, I hope that a new release is coming soon, at least as a beta!
This chipset was never fully supported. we will check if we can add it properly.USB Gb ethernet adapter (Techole UH411) with Realtek RTL8153
SFTP is slow single connection protocol, run multiple instances parallel to get faster results.What is the reason for that slow transfer?
this is rsync, i will add documentation tomorrow for thisThe rose-storage module also has command additions in /file/sync.
However that is completely undocumented and not so easy to figure out...
this issue is not related to new ROSE package. SMB in ROSE package currently will only support SMB2.1 SMB3.0, SMB3.1.1 dialectsHello,
please fix this (SUP-104510) . Thank you
nfs-share=...mount -t nfs server:/path /mountpoint
Thanks noted.Several comments:
documentation draft:Nice changelog, I don't know how to find that "rose-storage" ..
Please show us tools for building containers for those platforms and working example.So my point is if Mikrotik is going to be promoting container usage...they should try to make available on all platforms.
In this case, cause is not related to tmpfsSo what exactly is broken? Use of the RAM disk for container storage?
docker import https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/armvirt/64/openwrt-armvirt-64-default-rootfs.tar.gz openwrt-arm64
docker save openwrt-arm64 > openwrt_arm64.tar
Thanks, we repeated the issueCurrently I have done the test on a hAP ac3 (arm) and the same thing happens, the global variables disappear from the environment after a few minutes of closing the winbox.
Disks now have slot, as their name. This will be included in Winbox in future releases.I can't set or get the disk name on my hap ac3.
maybe in next releaseMaybe it could be combined with a new feature to have RAMdisk on ALL devices with sufficient RAM (not only those with insufficient flash) and a compatible
and predictable way to store persistent and nonpersistent files?
/container/print
/container/shell 0
this is in our to do list.The same way tun/tap access was enabled in containers under RouterOS maybe access to usb devices can be enabled too, with a proper feature request.
PCIe NVMe !PCIe AHCI or PCIe NVMe ?
I can't reproduce this. Please write to support with exact steps how are you getting this error and reference to this forum thread.I see the mounts, but I want to write to them, which is not possible (permission error).
NO!Could you allow systemd to work inside container?
/dev/net/tun device now is available for container useThat sounds good! How will it be supported?
how is "bridge mode" any different from current implementation?Is it fair to assume that the MT containers do not support the equivalent of Docker bridge mode networking?
And if that is correct, is future support for bridged mode on the roadmap?
/container set 0 mounts=config
sudo: effective uid is not 0, is /usr/bin/sudo on a file system with the 'nosuid' option set or an NFS file system without root privileges?
1) YesTwo quick questions about containers:
1) are veth interfaces mandatory, or can host networking be used?
2) the docs state that ext4 is supported, is this new? Any plans to add ext4 support to Disks > Format Drive?
we will look into it@antonsb is there any planning for other OS/hypervisor support, e.g. VMware ESXi 7.x ?
soon! just some minor things left.return container support
This power limit is active when "region=eu" is usednRay and LHG 60G is supposed to be capable same link lengths. Why to lower power limit for the nRay and not for LHG 60G? How that will play out?
This is due low gain antenna? WHich is the difference from LHG60?
This is True, but we had some software improvements regarding this as well:802.11ad works worse in cold weather not becouse it is freezing. Cold air becomes more dense and amount of oxigen per squere mitter increases.
stability in raised ambient temperaturesAntonsb it works well.... what we are missing?this will be available on new 802.11ay hardware.
Unfortunately this cannot be used reliably on our existing 802.11ad devices - that is why this frequency support is removed
Yes for experimental purposes, that's why we used horizontal Ethernet gland. Please keep in mind that dish design has drain hole, that needs to be sealed if used like that.I have seen that NRAY can be mounted rotated 90° changing antenna polarization this can help with rain and colocation?
What device are you using? Is reset button acting as WPS button on this device as well?thanks for reply. but it's not working
wiki is also updated:OK. now how to set event ?system routerboard reset-button set on-event=??????
Update: event on scripts must be entered.
Data is only updated when beamforming is working - we will fix this in upcoming versionsI have a MIKRO TIK RBwAPG-60ad KIT.
Looks like wrong baud rate.Hi All,
so disappointed with Mikrotik, after those years and ...
please show us exactly how are you testing this. We get full speed on much higher distances by using same testing tools.
Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?we try alignment many times but this is best, why rssi not below -49... whats your suggestions for this distance ?
frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.how can fixed it
/interface lte set lte1 apn-profiles=...
Does this looks like suggesting older versions?6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices
Would it not be better to recommend 6.43.7 stable that would have all the RC stuff inn it?
Are you running latest RouterOS versions?
6.43rc3
*) wireless - improved compatibility with BCM chipset devices
Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
it's not a standard channel66000 GHz is non standard freq for this band? Will You implement 66960 GHz and 69120 GHz?
This fix should provide better rate selection at higher rates and at higher load.Any description of improve? Thanks
*) wireless - improved stability for 802.11ac;
Test with external tool or Traffic-generator and You will get full Wire speedresults