Why buying a fanless unit if then you add a fan to it?
Just get one of the ones that have built in fan.
My reason to go fanless is desktop use. Otherwise I would have chosen a different model.
I got it from Amazon. Search for "10gtek asf-10g-t".Got a link?I replaced the S+RJ10 with a 10Gtek SFP and it runs way cooler at 10G speed, around 65 degrees..
same here. rc5 did not fix the problem for me.I upgraded to rc5 and I still can't manage with the SFP+ port active. I have to unplug the fiber from the SFP and plug in the cat 6. Very frustrating. DHCP still doesn't work very well either.
return them so Mikrotik support will learn what you get when someone submits a very annoying (and easy to fix) bug and their answer is "NO ETA"Same problem... I have 33 new units of this model. My dead line is in 7 days. If i don't have any solution i go to return the units.
... and that was it!!!many persons must disable that "Use Network APN" to activate that in APN field.
That's true, but I would like to be able to tell the modem to prefer B3 to B1 for CA, for example...Try cell lock but guys say CA is automatically determined by cell tower.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=159889#p798970
Unfortunately it seems I can only lock primary band. I wish I could also lock the CA ones.I always have three bands in CA (very good signal).
In your case, it simply disconnect poor connection but you can lock in bands you want as you already did.
I confirm the bug. Solved the issue thanks to this thread!I have not had time to confirm this, but your issue may be result of EG12-EA not passing correct APN to provider, even though it is correctly setup in ROS7 beta8
Try setting APN directly on modem via AT command AT+CGDCONT.
primary-band: B1@10Mhz earfcn: 150 phy-cellid: 81
ca-band: B7@20Mhz earfcn: 3350 phy-cellid: 280,B3@20Mhz earfcn: 1650 phy-cellid: 81
I think I also need source nat though... or the replies can't go back to the client in WAN.... am I correct?
It worked!! Thank you so much!
Yeah, dropped by "defconf: drop all from WAN not DSTNATed"
I guess the packets are dropped by the default firewall config?
could you please provide an example? I am not so prolific with routeros...Instead of dstnat, it should be possible to route it where you want it. You can't use regular way with different routing tables, but there's more direct action=route in prerouting.
it's http and https.Is this a custom protocol or could you use something in the Service Ports nat helper section?