Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020

Search found 4 matches

by jkreno
Sun May 27, 2018 9:38 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Supportive load balancing ?
Replies: 2
Views: 480

Re: Supportive load balancing ?

Just to re-state you wish. You would like to push users to a second internet link once the first has reached saturation ?
by jkreno
Sat May 26, 2018 11:18 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: [Solved] Routing Protocols not working on hEX 6.42.3 [OSPF/RIP]
Replies: 1
Views: 521

[Solved] Routing Protocols not working on hEX 6.42.3 [OSPF/RIP]

Hi, I just recently upgraded to 6.42.3 and I'm trying out the new configuration style without master ports. I have configured a bridge and added my target port to the bridge, then assigned an IP to the bridge. I can ping across the link just fine. But when I add OSPF or RIP to the bridge interface, ...
by jkreno
Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:19 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: IS-IS
Replies: 44
Views: 14090

Re: IS-IS

I think that the lack of IS-IS on Mikrotik's roadmap is going to be my reason from turning away from them. Other open source routing platforms are getting better and have some sort of basic IS-IS implimentation. But this might just not be a good space for Mikrotik to play in.
by jkreno
Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:27 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: IS-IS
Replies: 44
Views: 14090

Re: IS-IS

To say that one protocol is better than the other really isn't the argument. They were both developed around the same time, if anything OSPF was the lazy approach to implementation by tying you to IPv4. What IS-IS does give you that OSPF cannot is protocol independence. One protocol to handle v4 and...