Works for me, if in your script you try to add new interface to the VRF right after it is created, then make sure that you add some delay or check if interface exist. Interface may not appear right away if CPU has some load. The VRF is already present before the script execution, also the CPU is ru...

Post /ip route vrf print output Here it is: routing-mark=customer1 interfaces=bo2v951v1204,bo2v900v1204 route-distinguisher=65000:1204 import-route-targets=65000:1204,65000:999 export-route-targets=65000:1204,65000:1000 I've omitted the output of other VRFs for security purposes. Interface bo1v400v...

One of the interfaces you are trying to add does not exist, so you get an error. As much as I wish that was true, it unfortunately isn't. Please see configuration below: /interface vlan add comment="L2VPN - CVID 4" interface=bo1v400 name=bo1v400v4 vlan-id=4 add comment="Customer VRF" interface=bo2v...

/ip route vrf set [find routing-mark=EXAMPLE] interfaces="$[get [find routing-mark=EXAMPLE] interfaces],vlan4,vlan5" I've tried this workaround, but only works if the data from the retrieved variable is added to the interfaces command. For example: /ip route vrf set [find routing-mark=EXAMPLE] inte...

Hi. Yes they are both advertised withing VPNv4.

This is definitely a bug. The forwarding table was showing correctly in 6.35.1 though, but there were some other bugs that caused my setup not to work.

FYI. Support just confirmed the bug (2017022722000338) which will be fixed in next release.

No one??

Problem is not on RouterOS. Some mobile clients do not support multiple subnets. Hi mrz. I'm not sure if I understand why would that be a problem with mobile client. The client still receives all the routes, but Mikrotik doesn't know where to send the traffic because it doesn't have matching IPSec ...

Hi lads, I already opened a ticket about this, but I said it can't hurt if I write here as well... In (quite common) scenario where Mikrotik and client (mobile phone or PC at remote location) have dynamic IP address, you can only use dynamic creation of IPSec policies to get around that issue. I am ...

Hi, Is this a bug and has anyone seen it before? Routing table: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8951816/Mikrotik%20MPLS%20issue%20-%20RT.png MPLS Forwarding Table RT1: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8951816/Mikrotik%20MPLS%20issue%20-%20MPLS%20FIB.png MPLS Forwarding Table RT2: https://dl.d...