But it has two ethernet ports, so PWR-LINE-PRO can be used.There won't be one. Audience hasn't got USB port (at least I didn't see it mentioned), so you'll have to use generic PowerLine2ethernet devices.
And it doesn't look like having 16G and 1-2SFP+ in CRS112 size is something impossible either.Would be nice if CRS112 was half rack width with option to join 2 together to make 16 port full width.
Passthrough=yes is the default setting.It does not matter if I set it to passthrough :/
Also in Wiki there are not passthrough enabled..
As I said it works on hAP-lite just not hAP-AC2.
Have you tried it on hAP-AC2.. has anyone?
You are welcome!Good to know, now I can add the other vlans I have been planning;
Forget the Ghost Busters, call XVO!!
That's right and 184.108.40.206 is the right remote-address for 6to4/interface 6to4
add disabled=no !keepalive local-address=220.127.116.11 name=6to4-tunnel1 remote-address=18.104.22.168
local-address = wan IP remote-address = address of the tunnel end
/system logging add action=remote topics=firewall
I think any switch will do ok, but my point was to eliminate the need of additional switch at all, combing it's functionality with AP.any switch working like that to suggest to me for home applications?
Thanks a lot.
By the way, if anyone noticed, CRS332-32S+RM has now became CRS326-24S+2Q+RMCRS354-48G-4S+2Q+
Will be these ever released ?
You shouldn't use a backup file on the hardware of different type from the one it was created on.hello
I search the method for migrate my CCR1009 to my new CCR1036.
The combo port is not present in the CCR1036.
Should i modify manually the backup file before "import" ?
Thank for your advice.
What's new in 6.43.4 (2018-Oct-17 06:37):
Changes in this release:
*) ipsec - allow multiple peers to the same address with different local-address (introduced in v6.43);
I'm almost sure something like this is to be released in a foreseeable future.Ideally to have 4 x SFP+ and 10 1 GbE ports!. so if down stream switches can get 10 Gbps speeds.
Not that it really matters, but 2x10G + 2x10G + 10x2,5G = 65GSuch ports config would place it between CCR1036 and CCR1072 (or actually above CCR1072 because it'd give 85G theoretical throughput)The sweet spot would be 2x SFP+, 2x 10GBase-T, 10x 2.5GBase-T.
That won't work.You can use Time under access list rule, never tried it, but should work.
2x1Gbps would be enough for that.I'm starting to think that the only reason for RB4011 to have that SFP+ is that MT can claim it offers "1733 Mbps data rate" (see top most banner on all forum pages).
One could hardly claim that if all wired ports were 1Gbps.
Sure.A nother question regarding the hAP ac2: can it be used with capsman and be used as a switch at the same time if i would plug in any laptops or other wired junk if i neded an umph in speed?
My CCR1009 behaves the same way.thank you for the reply ! So I over-reacted. I don't need to worry about it ?
RB3011 is a better router, but CRS125 is a better switch.is rb 3011 best than cloud core crs 125 ? i use it as a switch....why not
With 228mm width two of them won't easily fit side-by-side.I wonder how would two units, rack-mounted side-by-side (custom rack-mount hardware needed), would look like. I guess ugly as well due to weird (for rack-mounting at least) unit height.
...and that is why the suggestion was about the "Bugfix" tree, not "RC"...DON'T do this Mikrotik, very bad idea !!!
RC is development and should be treated as beta software !
/interface wireless info> country-info country: kazakhstan ranges: 2402-2482/b,g,gn20,gn40(20dBm) 2417-2457/g-turbo(20dBm) 902-927/b,g,g-turbo,gn20,gn40(30dBm)
It should be something on the devices themselves then, just like it was with NAS2@xvo: Unfortunately, the client 2 client forwarding as well as local forwarding is not the solution: still no connection within VLAN3 via wifi.
@jotne: Thanks for the link - I will go reading now!
Looks like netinstall is the only solution:Yes, I tried it as first. But after restart is still Wireless package on it