Yes, that's the way.Can I have a parent=global queue to handle all traffic towards the LAN while not intermixing the rates with the upload traffic to the two internet interfaces?
Yes, that's the way.Can I have a parent=global queue to handle all traffic towards the LAN while not intermixing the rates with the upload traffic to the two internet interfaces?
What's new in 6.39 (2017-Apr-27 10:06):
!) ppp - implemented internal algorithm for "change-mss", no mangle rules necessary;
/interface export
/ip address export
chain=srcnat action=masquerade src-address=192.168.5.48/29 dst-address=!192.168.5.48/29 log=no log-prefix=""
Sounds like RB3011 is what you are looking for. Next option would be a CCR.At this moment I have CRS125-24G-1S and I want to get 2nd device with spf, gigabit lan ports and with Dude support.
I know... I meant ISPs are known/likely to throttle it down also, or even block it. The point of the OP was using a transport that was unlikely to be tinkered by the ISP...GRE does not use a port!
Similarly goes for GRE.- L2tp works only on port UDP 500. This is a sad notice. In OpenVPN i don't use standard ports for connect. Some ISPs will slow down traffic on this common ports.
chain=input action=drop in-interface-list=WAN
It can happen, you'd notice because after netinstall it won't boot either, there's a Backup Booter you can force on System > RouterBoard [Settings] in such case.Can the part of the firmware that handles this stage when booting get corrupted?
Then you need to force 1G also at Netgear's end, did you try that?If I change the port to auto-negotiation disabled, port speed 1G, Full Duplex, the link light will appear on the CRS and report transmission activity. The Netgear will not establish link light or pass traffic.
That's my guess also, check grounding of the enterasys, rack and 2011... everything should end on a single common ground.My guess was that the switch was creating a different ground level than the router, or something along these lines...
With omnis? don't.Maybe a mix Metal and Groove
Could be... have you torched MKT1 ether wired to MKT2 to see if DHCP requests are present?Capturing traffic at the edge router I don't see anythig related with the DHCP, is it possible that the first MKT is filtering the DHCP discover?
Cards? There's more than one? What's at the other side? A sector (PtMP)?BR433 on my side with cm9 cards
/ip route print detail
/ip address print
/ip firewall address-list print
Are there any PCs directly connected to the 3011? Do those ping internet?
instead of traceroute do a- 82.114.64.3
- 82.114.64.4
- 192.168.1.1
tracert -d 8.8.8.8
ipconfig /all
/export
/export
/export
This doesn't make sense, first sentence contradicts second... please review your post and try to be more specific...I have problem to reach 192.168.10.X from 192.168.20.X without connected 192.168.10.246 Link
But from 192.168.10.X i can reach 192.168.20.X ewen without 246 link