[jason@sosedge] /ip firewall nat> add chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=eth01_uplink> ip firewall nat
[jason@sosedge] /ip firewall nat> chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=eth01_uplink
syntax error (line 1 column 6)
- the CRS-internal ping test which also did not and still does not forward the pings !!! very confusing!
Did you study the tutorial I linked in one of my previous posts?I'm having a hard time digesting this one, can you elaborate a little bit please?It is advisable to configure all VLANs are tagged ... which doesn't mean it can not be untagged on the ethernet ports.
May I install NS behind Mikrotik? (for this plan)
I'm not sure about this, but it could be that device is not accepting MAC connections over ether1 ... so if your management PC is connected to ether1, try to plug it to some other ether port ...Well, it isn't showing up in winbox.
Or, if amount of RAM and storage offered by RB450Gx4 is not needed, a RBD52G (with wireless disabled) might be considered as well ... comes with a case and lower price-tag while offering same wired performance.Something like RB450Gx4 ...?
Maybe you are going backwards
Need feature to detect if device have poe-out interfaces - now any poe-command (even print command) causes error in script if HW doesn't have poe-out interfaces...
If the internet service is for a hotel, why would you even consider allowing one guest to hog all the bandwidth MKX.
@mkx: Or you can use ...