Look at the api
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/API_PHP_package
Looks more you Are searching for OSPFAn example, the 5 GHz. loses its connection through DFS.
The 2.4 GHz. connection must take over immediately.
That is why I would put the two interfaces in bonding.
Ether1 = 5 GHz. link
Ether2 = 2.4 GHz. link
Linux kernel has upgraded from 3.3.5 to 4.14.131.What is the current version of the kernel?I believe we used the phrasing, much imroved BGP speed, or something like that
Install labtest Beta before you try the Beta, that helps for meTried twice to install V7 on my hap ac2. Bricked the hell out if it. Thank MikroTik for netinstall...... Wil try beta2
Yes it runs about 30s so upload and Downgrade works....and you flashed it back to 6.x?Yup. Got 1 kernel panic so definitely would run this in lab onlyanyone installed it on a 4011 yet?
Possible for the 5ghz Interface, But not for 60ghz
and spectral scan / history workingWe need asap something like EPMP3000 mu-mimo 4x4 with GPS sync compatible with NV2 and 802.11N/AC client
Look for Local ForwardingI've confirmed the problem, when I use Quick Set "Home AP Dual", my Wi-Fi upload speed will be 200mbps, if I use Quick Set "CAP", the upload speed will become 400mbps.
All my wireless setting is same, very strange issue.
Yes, i think everything is possible abtuet The last 5 years...It is even possible that there will be v7 linux kernel for v7 routerOs
wait for Ros 7And nothing...Two years...
What you need is a Bridge config, and the Dish set Is a P2P Bridge out of Box, is it possible to configure both master and slave units of Wireless Wire Dish as switches ?
WAN ---- Main switch ----- Master dish ------ Slave Dish ---- Secondary switch
Best regards
This is more about a smartphone and a non english auto correctionYeah and I am a newbie seeking some help. Clearly, your english is worse than my config. Thanks anyway.
4.xxCan you give some information on what kernel it will be using 4.x or 5.x?I just want to let everyone know, that v7 is progressing pretty good this year, and most core functionality is usable. Some more difficult parts need to be done and we can release a public beta.
For 500m you Better Choose a 60Ghz ProductHi, it´s for about 500 meters and with 100 mbps aggregate it´s sufficient...
Finally.... lot of tests.... lot of configs, solved with a pair of nanobeam ac gen2
Thanks !!
no, KidControl.......which is even more important for you?
maybe another fix LCD?
They will need years to get close to competitorsAny news from Mikrotik?
Wifi4EU completed (in April 2019) the second call and other thousands of municipality will receive their voucher..
This is a very very big opportunity for Mikrotik
135 Mpbs is max Brutto, its WiFi, with an old 54Mbit 802.11a you got about 20MbitWell, i expected more. On 135Mpbs rate it should be 60Mbps stable with those signal levels and ccq.
On Christmas but you don't know the year......When I can use ROS v7 ?
they are digging their own grave!Also "CH0 5G" - 5GHz backup, unpopulated again
2 db tx powerThat's 36 dBm Tx power or 2 dBm Tx power?Yes, longest link is 32km, 36 dBm EIRP, 34 dBIDishes, 250MBit real TCP
This is early access shop, you need to be registered and allowed to see thisplease original link ???Bad news for mikrotik
60ghz.png
Yes and they do it right from the beginning, integrated 5 GHz Backup....Bad news for mikrotik
60ghz.png
At this Moment the only Chipset that is Support 4x4 is the One in the 4011, and it looks like the Driver only works on ARM based boards, so not for the M11GCan a 4x4 card be used on this RouterBOARD RBM11g?
THANK YOU
nothing new.......Well, these all new PowerLine devices are ok, but what about MT outdoor wireless? Has MT mentioned any plans to introduce some new AP? Or we're stuck with good ol' RB912/92x?
Impossible with 3.xx Kernel, and missing support for actually HardwareAt this point I'd take a 1U server with an Intel Xeon with a bunch of SFP+ cards jammed in the front and a Mikrotik logo stuck on.
In most CaSes this is not IP Traffic, it is only an range extender, No IP ConverterAre you 100% sure that your converter outputs standard Ethernet frames?
Good point!Great hardware.
If the software would be on the same niveau as the hardware is, I'd start buying mikrotik again.
Yes that is the big MUM (tomorrow too)Was this the big European MUM? Or is that one in April?
There seems to have been no live stream.
First things firstNo new 60 ghz device with 5 ghz backup?
Normis told that in an another thread, but he did not say it will happen this yearDo you have any specific information about something to happen?Will a new wireless driver package for 802.11ac be released in 6.45 or is it planned for a later RouterOS version?
We are not able to do Business decisions with a maybe or "in near future"
Nothing has changed from that time. Please suggest what answer you wanted to hear.
No one is talking about RC2 or RC3, we talk about Wireless Protocol NV2I cant see rc3 firmware!!!
Where can download?
+1
should know the correct TX-sector (not the center). Mikrotik, please finally post the LHG60 emission diagrams, please!
You want to get next Beta Tester, buy arm that’s Beta enoughI'd prefer to see ax based protocol than Wave 2 ac
Normis wrote on other Topic that they develop new driver with wave 2 support, but we don’t no when it is availableCome on MikroTik support, at least tell us if you're planning something or not.
I have done picture with HP Laptop and 4011 still 54MBit, IPhone connects with full speed, not solved in actual Beta!Not true, new betas fix the issue with Apple and the issue is with Apple new driver, not RouterOS driver.- they incompatible to some Intel and Apple devices
Depends on link conditionsHi,
Please can someone tell me what is real TCP bandwidth with DynaDish 5 at around 2,5-3km ?
For us the same, ping lags on arm Based CPE, VoIP not possibleTest 2x ARM Bridge. Not stable & slower than MIPSBE.ARM works very well. The only issue I know of, is lack of full compatibility with legacy Nv2 protocol.
Any other problems?
Whats about smaller Channels?chipset limit is 8
OK, 4 port switch with POE?wrong highlight, though. I would highlight the previous sentence, where it says that there are more antenna elements, so it's basically a sector design. not more interfaces.
Mimosa too, but Mikrotik maxes out with 180-190 Mbit @ 40 MhzReally? No way man, Ubnt AC 240-280Mbps on 40Mhz at 8km Around 130Mbps at 20MHz...
You need to use Station pseudo bridgeI'm not at home atm, at weekend i will post the configs. Thank you.hi
please send here
/interface bridge export
/ip firewall export
Mikrotik call this feature......My old N cpe mikrotik works faster than my new ac cpe.
No it doesn’t....Horn is not economically profitable for some locations.
Interesting, it seems to me that after the latest updates the army works well.
Useless Device until smaller channels availableOnly Lite version - LHG Lite60
Only LHG-60AD or LHGG-60AD too?From support:
Hello,
Yes! We didn't manage to get CE for RBLHG-60ad therefore we can't sell it in Europe.
Best regards,
Martin Kengis
Better buy new Hardware, and throw this low cost electronics awayMaybe we should pay open wrt to create arm software. Mikrotik won't solve the problem
Yes, this gets better in with the last updates, but ROS has serious problem with more than 2 chains, speed does not benefit....Isn't that almost same numbers as for OpenWRT?
For ARM Hardware there is nothing.....@Mikrotik does not solve the problem. Maybe it's time to try alternative software. Has anyone tried with other software?
no, in my opinion this depends on the used Cihipset,Is there any throughput dropout like on the HAP ac2?
B5 and B5c are PTP Radioswhat are the models and how much are they?
In our case this oneCan you all list exact Intel wireless chips that were in the clients, when the test performed so poorly?
He is talking about MUM EuropeA little birdie whispered into my ear that March is a welcoming month full of surprises.
Indeed. Unlike previous years solar equinox is going to happen around 21st marking start of Fall on southern hemisphere.
No they don’t use MT for WirelessWhat I meant to say was - for other competitors to deliver higher speeds (exclude full duplex) are they using 80-160Mhz bandwidth per AP channel ?
No, try 280MBIt TCP with Mikrotik @40mhzDeliver higher speed using how much bandwidth (80-160MHz?)We have a lot of Mikrotik CPE out there, but in last 6 month we realized how competitors are able to deliver higher speeds, Mikrotik is outdated, I don’t believe that we came back to Mikrotik
Wait for Christmas.....New firmware, same problem
For all Mikrotik don’t use pseudobridgeExcuse me.
ap1s bridge
ap1c station bridge
ap2s bridge
ap2c station pseudobridge
We have a lot of Mikrotik CPE out there, but in last 6 month we realized how competitors are able to deliver higher speeds, Mikrotik is outdated, I don’t believe that we came back to MikrotikI Hope arm solution every day...
possible, we cannot control it, no other vendor in WISP business has ARM and TDMA.....it's an hardware bug and it can't be resolved
i´ve got this mail in march 18 some days before mum Berlin..... and until now nothingFrom support:
Hello,
Apologies for the inconvenience, this issue is being investigated by our development team and should be fixed in the upcoming releases of the RouterOS.
Best regards,
There are no mispbe ac CPE‘s available they are all legacyEasy, very easy don´t buy unfixed product. Buy mipsbe thats works fine
Maybe in 2019, but they don’t care, so we don’t care too, we has to grow, and did exchange on some Places with great success, we don’t need Mikrotik anymore....Maybe with new drivers in V7 but the main question is when V7 'll be released?