Something very wrong there. Even the RB2011 could do 350Mb without fast track!
Config will tell the story.
Correct, however it is done from client of interface perspective so for pppoe interface the values do reverse.it's rx/tx , I think, so upload or download depending on that interface / target you apply it to.
What did you use to test?Just finished bandwidth test
Tell me about it. Hindsight eh?The only "script" you'd possibly need is a CD set to loop saying noAs a parent of a 2, 3, 5 and 8 year old speaking. Have you considered saying "No"? No scripting needed.
Losing a bucket of throughput, opening yourself up to local noise and losing full duplex.Just use a weird 5GHz channel nobody else is using
Forgot I made that video.
My MTCNA tutor taught to increment the first digit set by 2.Interesting
So I will then always set up bridges like this:
Where x are random[0-9A-F]Code: Select all/interface bridge add admin-mac=x[26AE]:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx auto-mac=no name=bridge
I like your optimism.Hope they integrate IDS/IPS feature in RouterOS in v7.Very difficult in general now as most P2P uses encryption.
PEBKAC ?Good info all the way round.
I suspect it may have been this.......... .g. laptop connected to wifi and eth at the same time with those interfaces bridged.
It has not re-occurred yet.
Not available (yet) but both SFQ and PCQ can provide a solution if you don't have brand flexibility.Any update?
Because.......I agree but just strange it allows it on Sat...
00:00:00-23:59:59
It's ARM like the poster above has said.I see so I have been using the wrong file for uprade ehhhhhhhh ok I will check the architecture and let you know
It's a change to how you need to operate. Sad in the short term I agree but once you adjust your working methods. It will become second nature as it currently is.Thank you for your reply. But it's vary sad...
Where is your budget at? A hAP AC2 could do what you want but so could a CCR1009. Budget plays a part.Which one would be recommended? Small physical size would be good for me...
Yes.So, I have too much firewall rules and/or too much VLAN routing?
Done.I suggest you all write to Mikrotik support, seeing as they clearly don't believe me - based on the fact that they have done NOTHING about this bug in the last 9 months.
Posting here is essentially pointless.
Are you running IP > Cloud ? Would be the "easiest" thing to check at this point as it is a prerequisite.For IntusDave:
Do you have any problem or do you update? I run your script but the script didn't download nothing.
I thank you for your help!
I am using ESXi 6.5.0 u2 with absolutely no issues at all. Is there any reason you have not updated your ESXi installation?I have the following Configuration:
VMware ESXi v6.0.0
That is extremely good news.Yes, we are aware of this peculiarity and we are working also on new routers that have higher power per core, not just many cores.