MikroTik

Hi inssomniak. It sounds like you have a mismatch somewhere. Set the vpls mtu to 1500. Allow CW for vpls. Set the physical interface to the max l2mtu it supports that is also supported by the remote end. Set the mpls mtu per ldp carrying interface and set it the same as the l2mtu for that interface....

Im confused. Using bgp for distribution of L2VPN works perfectly for me.

It seems to be fixed in 6.5

Is it long enough to be considered 'more time' now? How's it running?

It is stable on our network. Thanks Mikrotik, this should tide us through until v7

Is there any color more beautiful than Aqua?

The raspberry pink OM4 fibre looks pretty nice

They really exist:

CCR1036-8G-2S+ throughput is up to 42 million packets per second at the moment.

We just received our first two CCR-1036-8G-2S+

The "at the moment" comment sounds like Mikrotik will be improving this soon

I believe Janis did some testing on maximums on v6. Maybe email support for an official answer.

Not yet....

Kreacher / realtime your last few posts do not seem to be remotely related to the topic. Or am I mistaken ?

Great to hear. Maris emailed me yesterday with test version but I have not had a chance to test it yet. Im optimistically hoping this will fix the problems for us too. Did it work? Test regime: Test1 ( PASS ) Insert ~50 routes in to a VRF and withdraw/re-insert every 30 minutes 10 times, ensure rou...

an update about [Ticket#2013090666000521] vrrp backup problem - 6.x

all the ccr eth interfaces, in rare cases, get flapping all togheter.
this happen on the router where we have vrrp interface in backup mode.

thanks
Ros

So this is a current bug?

Great to hear. Maris emailed me yesterday with test version but I have not had a chance to test it yet. Im optimistically hoping this will fix the problems for us too.

Hi Geeek

L3VPN network on version 5.26 works perfectly. check your configurations.

What happens when you withdraw a group of routes ? Is this reflected in the routing tables of your PE routers ?

It will work and you will get 10gigabit.

I would suggest you talk to HotLava. They use the same chipsets but have more options e.g. 4x10G ports on a single pci-e card.

In v7 you will be able to do this with bgp and address-list filter target.

So the new RB953 is ARM based.

Nice move.

Thanks Sergejs,

The audio was great this time

A lot of cool new products for us to buy.

Use netflow to pfacct machine is what I would do for accounting.

I thought you were wanting queuing

A bunch of us are having issues with L3VPN on RouterOS: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=73820

You can achieve this using address lists

nfacct is what you need

Unfortunately I have no idea when this will be available.

When the new routing is released you will be able to do this. It will allow you to add prefixes to an address list with a filter, you can then mark packets based on the address list. So you would add communities to domestic vs international routes then create address lists from these using filters. ...

We're seeing the same problems: in rb1100ahx2 some ethernets simply won't go to full duplex (even if auto is disabled).

recycling the interface(disa>ena) won't help.

We are seeing the same on RB1100ahx2. Port 11/12 seem to be fine but ports on the switch chips are unusable.

Thanks for such a professional response Mikrotik.

VPN addresses are /32. Try to remove /24 from ospf networks and add only remote /32 addresses. Do not add local 192.168.1.1/32 mrz maybe I am misunderstanding what you are trying to achieve with this, but to me this kind of defeats the purpose of OSPF networks, you are meant to be able to put the /...

This is one of the issues we are also seeing.

I thought it was since 6.x came out, but just tested with 5.24 and it also happens there. Went back to 5.16 and the problem does not exist.

It's actually quite disappointing that this "feature" is available, but is buggy and has been for a long time, and is not even considered important enough to address. It will be fixed in the "new routing"? I'm not holding my breath. It hasn't been fixed for how many years now? O...

The last update we had from Mikrotik sales they said late September.

We couldn't wait and just got two current model CCR's to carry us through until it it released.

Do you plan to release SOHO like router (RB951G) with dual-band wireless?

Surely its only a matter of time

Press … and select the MAC Address directly, then connect.
ROS 6.2 and CCR1036

same for me. I can't connect with winbox and mac, even mac server configuration correctly configured

+1 I have 8x CCR 1036 I am unable to connect to with MAC-Winbox. Have tried 6.0rc5 (default) and 6.2

It is a new feature and has not yet been added to winbox.

Hopefully we see it added and get xauth-RADIUS soon.

Again occurred. iBGP routes with fangs disappear after the eBGP. I had to download all the Peers of CCR to normalize. When Mikrotik will fix this? We are seeing this behavior on 5.12, 5.14, 5.16, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 We often will get routes that are not in the RIB but exist in the FIB. We have to add sta...

Can you stand up statically configured VPLS tunnels ?

MPLS/LDP config looks fine, I didnt read all the BGP part, but from what I did read it was correct.

I too think this will be in v7.

And to add a little more speculation, I think v7 beta and the new features will be announced at US MUM.

new routing stuff is going into v7, which contains the long promised "new routing engine" :( I was hoping for v6 release of this. So there is no hope for it to be a test release for v6? Or better a backport to v6? I think that point releases should only be bug fixes and minor changes. Maj...

new routing stuff is going into v7, which contains the long promised "new routing engine" Normunds, We will hold a celebration when v7 with "new routing engine" is available :) If you guys next need testers let me know, we are using most of the more advanced features, have a myr...

+1 vxlan support would be awesome. And its built in to the kernel since 3.7 so should not be too hard.

HI, This problem solve? My CCR36 make stuck route with iBGP quagga / CCR. News? It is not fixed. Mikrotik are too busy working on other things to fix it. Log a support ticket with support@mikrotik.com and include supout.rif Hopefully if enough people log tickets they can give the problem some prior...

Really bad info. Since we cannot start the rollout of CCR's before the vrf issue is solved in 6.x. (works like a charm in all 5.x). The situation is the same for us. Unfortunately L3VPN does not work on v5 either or we could run it on x86. These features have been in RouterOS since late 3.x release...

Some bad news.

I received an update from Mikrotik support to let me know that these problems are not a priority and that they are busy working on other problems.

This means that IPv4 / L3VPN as well as clustered BGP remain unusable in production on Mikrotik RouterOS.

samsung172 your issue sounds very similar to mine. I am using OSPF, BGP (L3VPN signalling), VRF and also route leaking. I notice that the route leaking partially works on 6.2, e.g. Static/Connected routes appear to be leaked, but if you redistribute "Other BGP" it does not work. So the iss...

this has been known for a while. I first posted about this I 2012 : The Vrf, has been unstable in all releases of 6.x My experience is that L3VPN on RouterOS has been unusable for much longer. I tried it in 5.0rc, 5.12, 5.16 and then gave up since Mikrotik said it would be fixed in the "new ro...

Has anyone else had any response from Mikrotik Support on these issues ?

They seem to have gone silent on my ticket.

It's pretty well understood that things are kinda rocky in transitioning to ROS 6. Can we all please submit as many tickets to Mikrotik so that successive versions can get better? It does us no good to just complain frivolously. I think Mikrotik is trying to do what they do as best as they can. Let...

Debugged it to the point that if you run MPLS and by the moment you enable redistribution for a VRF via BGP, then one core is constantly at 100% load and a few moments later routing completely stops working.

Join the party

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=73820

Is it normal that MT does not reply to support mails ? Was my first request, just wondering. I think it depends on: - How busy they are - The subject of the issue - How major the problem is - If it is related to the "new & cool" feature For some RouterOS components e.g. MPLS it seems ...

Norpan I think your issue is different from my primary issue. The issue I have is stale routes within a VRF, e.g. a withdraw is received by the PE router but the route is never actually withdrawn from the FIB. This bug has been in RouterOS since at least 5.0rc's. In my lab I have 6.1 as a route orig...

Hi Norpan,

Sorry I did not read your post completely. It does sound related.

Hopefully Mikrotik can fix these issues quickly

Hi Norpan, Your issue is different from the issue that has been discussed here, but being a problem related to MPLS is still quite interesting. Have you looked at the packets "outside" the Mikrotik, e.g. captured them with wireshark on a mirror port? That would be really interesting if it ...

As per the prior posts here the fix is NOT in the v5 series - I agree flush cache would help but the reality is that we as users should be following the v6 release chain now - and helpling Mikrotik squash bugs.... if only they'd get back to me on my open ticket ;-) They are possibly working on the ...

These are really common in old CRT televisions. No idea what they are called though

If I understand your question properly, you can add a "Local Binding" for the associated subnet and set it to implicit null. e.g. /mpls local-bindings add dst-address=10.99.0.0/24 label=impl-null This will force PHP for that subnet. However, come to think of it, if you dont have the interf...

I never saw this issue from latest 5 and 6rc versions. So for me it looks fixed.

Me too

Thanks Mikrotik !

This appears to be ongoing for some time, what kind of timeline does Mikrotik have on a working MPLS VPN given they are pushing "Cloud Core Routers" ? I'm used to Cisco who would consider this a serious issue and would not push a new release out (citing a bunch of fixes) whilst such a fun...

Hi Guys, L3VPN is currently unusable on RouterOS, and has been since at least 5.0rc days. There are multiple issues with L3VPN on RouterOS: 1. BGP route withdraw are received but not actioned on L3VPN endpoints (results in stale routes) 2. Loopback interfaces within a VRF are reachable from within o...

Hi Crami

I have a similar setup.

Please email support@mikrotik.com with your problem and a supout.rif they are actively working on problems with L3VPN at the moment.

regardtv

No it is happening on a 100% mikrotik test bed

We too are experiencing this issue. Our symptoms are similar to regardtv I have supplied screenshots and supout.rif's from our RouterOS 6.1 testing in Ticket#2013061366000148 What we are seeing is RT00 VRF --L3VPN--> RT01 VRF --L3VPN--> RT02 VRF RT00 originates a route, this is seen by RT01 and RT02...

............................................... and this is not the place to report issues - write to support Yes I agree but it also very important that we the users of Mikrotik products can view potential issues being posted and that the questions are answered by Mikrotik, this way we as users ca...

Are there any news about CCR1036-8G-2S+ (should be available in June according to the croatian MUM presentation) or the CRS125-24G1S-RM (should be available in May according to the croatian MUM presentation)? Price? Availability? New dates? Anything? KR, uebi Expected late June through to mid July....

EoIP on v6 on x86 is unstable for us. We have switched to L2TP for now, but would prefer to go back to EoIP.

这个论坛是英语语言

Is anyone else experiencing DHCP server not working on v6 x86 ?
run sniffer files from clients and send to support. we have not yet had any reports.

Hi Normis, done and logged Ticket#2013052766000123

CRS "Cloud Router Switch" is a new product from Mikrotik that will be out shortly.

It is basically a RB2011 with more ports, the new style white case and HOPEFULLY 802.3af POE

Is anyone else experiencing DHCP server not working on v6 x86 ?

The new diagram is really good.

It is clearer than the previous diagram.

you write to support@mikrotik.com and wait for response. they will say when they fix what you need

Or nothing at all...

Ticket#2013050266000072
Ticket#2013043066000404

tomaskir best email support@mikrotik.com and let them know. I doubt they will see it here

I have problems with filters too. Sometimes if I copy a filter it`s doesn`t work. I need to configure a new filter from scratch to work. Yes. This is one of the issues. We also found even on new filters sometimes you need to disable/enable them to get them to work. (Yes even with bgp peer refresh)

I can confirm the issues we were having with stuck BGP and OSPF routes have been resolved by this release.

We still have a number of issues with route filters and have opened a ticket with Mikrotik but so far have had no respinse.

Currently RADIUS support for xauth is not implemented. Hi Maris, I know you guys are super busy, but any idea when this feature will be implemented ? We will do some testing on the current implementation, but I would say xauth --> RADIUS is pretty important to anyone wanting to deploy RouterOS as a...

Hi Maris,

Thanks for all the hard work on the IPSEC improvements.

Can xauth use RADIUS ? And if so what attributes are relevant?

I hope so. This is a must have feature!

Support are well aware of this issue. I have had an open ticket with them for several months now.

+1 the exact issue i get regularly. It appears most New Zealand isp dns servers respond with TC flag....

Obviously this is only an issue if you are using the Mikrotik as a DNS proxy.

Reading both of those examples, no where does it say it will do 10gbit. It says "10 gigabit ports" not 10gbit throughput.

Hi Mikrotik staff,

I understand you are all very busy working on RouterOS. But can someone please look at Ticket#2013050266000072
It is regarding an issue with BGP pre-pends on RouterOS 6.

I also have Ticket#2013043066000404 open which may be related.

Thanks.

You guys obviously read something I didnt. I always interpreted the marketing to say the RB1200 was a low-performance fanless router, one step below the RB1100. I also do not recall ever reading it could do 10gbit !!!. All of ours are acting as LSR's and or VPLS bridges, they work very well and we a...

it is a release candidate for sure - but major things like Vlans should work.... and also with 5.24 we have even more sudden reboots of the boxes and no answers or fixes and MT sell routers where you cant use a final ROS ( CCR ) We are using vlans, bonding and vlans on bonding with no issues. Are y...

We have had no performance issues with them and have a lot out in the field.

What issues did you have?

Hi Maris,

Should 6.0rc14 fix the issue with stale routes inside VRF's ?

e.g. routes received via L3VPN.

Regards,

Andrew

Yep, I noticed that too a few days back. I'm going to test it later this week since we can reliably produce the problem.

Hi Maris,

Will the mode-cfg settings be added to Winbox ?

Thanks mrz

I will test tomorrow

We have noticed that EoIP tunnels are not stable on 6.0rc13

We have RouterOS 6.0rc12 x86 running an EoIP tunnel back to a RB1100 reliably, but as soon as we went to rc13 this has become unstable.

united states sugar company has a large network, if you want, here is a video case study http://www.tiktube.com/video/HKgD3hDqenqKlDHppLEvqsptGlnoKDKn= <rant> Do people not know how to shut up while attending a presentation anymore? I cannot deal with this video for all the crowd chit chat in the a...

The smart money would be on the CRS using the QCA871x/QCA851x chipsets

do you have ideas as to the shape of the SXT HG? It appears to be significantly deeper than the normal SXT...perhaps some witchcraft to make it have tighter beamwidth? Hi Dave, I am just guessing here, while the antenna gain is not significantly higher than the previous model, it is most likely mor...

It would be better on the CRS

What's the advantage for the mini-pcie wireless card?

It is Mini PCI-e so faster than normal Mini PCI. Also it will fit in the new RB911 and RB912

Oh, Thanks to Mikrotik for all the hard work that has gone in to the new products. The CRS and CCR-1036-8G-2S+ are what a lot of us have been waiting for. I like the Micro-SD card on the front of the new CCR, hopefully we see that on more products. It would be nice if we could load FW/configs from t...

Any thoughts on making a CCR with more 10g ports? Ideal for me would be one with two 10g-base-t ports (to connect to two core switches), and one SFP+ port (to connect to fiber running to another site). --Eric I think Normis mentioned that there was currently a hardware limitation. The announced mod...

the current process is incredibly complex and difficult to understand so it would be good if there was a new method for working with this. I agree, configuring the switching on RouterBoards is overly complex. Hopefully the CRS has a sane way to configure the switched ports as access, trunk, define ...

A huge amount of new products have been announced at the Europe MUM.

Including new CCR models.

See http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 24#p360124 for more details.

Want

Wow a lot of new products announced at the Europe MUM. Mikrotik have been very busy. I'll put the best first... :) CCR1036-8G-2S+ - 10Gigabit CCR, 2x SFP+, 8x Gigabit Ethernet, 36 Core Tilera, 16GB RAM, 28Gbit throughput, 42 Million PPS, Available June CRS - Cloud Router Switch, RouterBoard 9xx seri...

During MT tries to develop their CCR, Ubiquiti already launched many products such as AirFiber, AirEdge, New UniFi bla bla...

and look how flexible and feature rich they are

They are completely different products for completely different markets.

I think people are being a little impatient. It is widely known that: - The CCR is pre-production - Not all parts of RouterOS are optimized for Tilera (particularly Routing and PPP) - IPSEC is currently not accelerated on Cloud Core Router Im being optimistic, but I would say within a few RC's the m...

Maybe it has something to do with bridges...? I have a bridge for every port on e.g. RB100U. Flash/HDD aren't doing anything when 100% cpu occurs. You only need to send some data through the router and it's on 100%. Didn't see this in RoS v5.18 and below. I have seen it on 5.16 also. You may be on ...

Putting the LEDs in the ports also helps making the unit smaller. +1 Lights in ports +1 Stacked ports 802.3af/at POE out would be fantastic, having a compact device with 8 switched POE ports and a couple of "uplinks" would be an awesome branch router product. Something like a Cisco 1861, ...

I hope the live feed actually works this time!

I need my new products fix

Yummy
RB912G

No that wont work

Just use EoIP/vpls tunnels and bridge it all back to the main controller.

Just upgrade the cards to DBii F50N cards.

CPU will handle it

Browse the et repository via http. its very comprehensive.

Its better.

Look at emergingthreats.net

Personally I think Suricata is a better fit. It will allow IDS/IPS functionality in addition to just DPI, will allow marking of packets rather than just reporting on them, and has had extensive testing on the Tilera platforms (they are a Tilera partner) see http://suricata-ids.org/2012/12/21/oisf-we...

this problem will be fixed in rc12

Hi mrz,

I am running rc12 and this problem still exists.

e.g. I create a loopback bridge, assign an IP address, add this interface to a VRF other than main, and I am still able to ping the loopback from the main table.

Hi All Ive read somewhere about a commercial (paid) traffic shaping script written by a Mikrotik trainer - but never managed to work out who. I really need a ready to go (tested) script to save a bit of time. Does anyone know who it may be? Cheers That would be Butch's script. See http://store.wisp...

It requires a special test package to use. We are not ready to make it public yet.

Sorry for letting the cat out of the bag.

When I discovered it, I was too excited not to!

I have 4 CCR 6RC11 the core VRF with no problems. What you guys been experiencing problems? Running L3VPN (VPN4) with MPLS, routes stay in the routing-table and active even though the BGP peer is down. This has been confirmed by Mikrotik as a bug, and I have been told it will be fixed in the "...

Still waiting for the vrf fix so its possible to implement v6x to core routers.

+1

The bugs with VRF's have been holding us back for over a year now.

Why no solid capacitors ?

The RB751 has them, why not the RB951G ?

They also talk about 802.11u and Hotspot 2.0 in there....

Yep, pretty exciting stuff.

Trust me, this is MUCH better than what the Ubiquiti Uni-Fi's do.

This is closer to what AeroHive, Ruckus, Fortinet and Motorola do.

Ta da http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wi ... Controller

Awesome new "Enterprise" feature Mikrotik

If this works well we can stop selling hundreds of AP's from other vendors each year.

It looks like the load doesn't get balanced over multiple cores. This is what I suspected. It's too bad that we can't use the full potential of this CPU. Mikrotik are furiously working away on a new routing engine that will make use of massively multicore architectures like the Tilera processors in...

I dont understand how so many people have issues with SXT.

We have a bunch from the first production run, 100m from the ocean with high wind going about 2km and they have been rock solid. They have survived several tropical cyclones now.

We mounted them just like in the Mikrotik video.

Make sure you are on 5.22 the DNS bug has the same effect

Also I would suggest upgrading to RouterOS 5.22 or newer, it sounds like the DNS bug

*) ip/ipv6 firewall has all-ether,all-wireless,all-vlan,all-ppp interface matchers

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU Mikrotik

What version of RouterOS ?

There were DNS bugs before 5.22

Its just unbelievable the way this isssue isn't addressed. Does it mean I stop using the routerboard and gove the edgemax router a try. In an industry where time is money, it was more expensive for us to follow this through with Mikrotik support, than it was to replace all the mips-be devices with ...

You dont need much gain at this distance.

You could use a length of wet string as an antenna and it would work.

What signal strength do you have at each end?

Turn tx power down. 2 to 4dB will be plenty.

Anything more and you will be aiming at the side lobes and not be able to tell.

Cloud Core Router

This conversion should help when dealing with RouterOS:

Beta = Alpha
RC though x.16 = Beta
.16 and higher = Stable

I never deploy a new RouterOS release unless I absolutely have to, and always test the features I use on VM's before deploying it.

Congratulations on the Leading Exporter award

I too would like an update on this.

This feature would be extremely useful for us.

routeros rc7 tilegx when 3 fullview bgp instances are processed simultaneosly router crashes and rebooted but when i enable one instance after another giving each of them time proccess routes it works great until bgp flap is this known issue ? or i need to submit support.rif ? same problem i notice...

GRE or EoIP over ipsec with ospf will work well for this.

This issue still exists in 6.0rc7.

Mikrotik, any ETA on it being in the 6.0 RC's ?

It makes sense to me. Just like radgroupreply table with FreeRadius....

RC7 currently Firewall doesn't have optimization for 36 cores, we will deliver that as soon as possible, and your performance should increase some 25-30 times. Normis did you have any eta for this ? It is hard to say, but I think in February it will be available. Thanks to everyone at Mikrotik for ...

I emailed support regarding this last year and got a response from Maris saying they would consider this for future versions.

Maybe email support@mikrotik.com as the more requests they get for it the more likely it is to happen.

Hi there I've got OSPF running and it seems to be ok but we have an IPSec tunnel to a friends house which terminates on a fortinet firewall and we can't get OSPF working. I do have OSPF working over a PPTP link to another mikrotik and two mikrotiks in the house. all in same area. any ideas? Thanks ...

Still not getting why ovpn is better than a gre tunnel... what am I missing here? It seems it's being used in niche type situations... Im guessing encrytion. And yes OpenVPN is a niche technology. I have never seen an enterprise router with support for OpenVPN, and have never seen it being used out...

I emailed Mikrotik about 8 months ago with photos of a similar arrangement on Juniper EX switches. I got a response back saying they were considering it for future products.

Make sure you are running 5.21 or newer RouterOS. There was a DNS bug that can cause similar behavior to what you are describing.

Do not you think that there are firewalls? ovpn and is the only solution The top two reasons I use it between sites, as well as for remote access: UDP transport - stateless, with very few (if any) issues passing through a firewall Basic routing support - ability to push routes to clients or other s...

Are these fixes in 6.0rc6 ??

Why does everyone want OpenVPN? I've never, ever seen it used in enterprise. It's GRE with IPSec, or just ipsec tunnels. Please explain to me why it's such a wanted feature? It baffles me too. I suspect it is due to the vey basic IPSEC support on RouterOS. I would be happy to see Mikrotik add xauth...

And second using a separate chip for data plane. And if the second advantage is controversial because advances in multi-core CPU can make this approach impractical. Then use such OS is a huge plus (IMHO). It sounds like you are comparing RouterOS to a general purpose operating system, which it is n...

That only works if there's no competition. It looks like UBNT want's to eat MT's lunch now with EdgeMax and my guess is that they will if MT does not step up. Considering the HUGE difference in feature set, it is going to take EdgeOS some years to even reach feature parity with what RouterOS curren...

I dont see the problem, this is the behavior I would expect with two default routes received via BGP.

You cannot have two active routes to the same prefix with BGP, it does not support ECMP natively.

no, "new routing" package is not yet included in v6
Is there an ETA ?
When it will be ready

Haha, just as I expected !

I was worth a try...

I anxiously await the "new routing", the BGP/OSPF bugs in RouterOS 5.x are causing me some grief at the moment.

no, "new routing" package is not yet included in v6

Is there an ETA ?

I used to use the R52Hn for long distance ptp links , but switched to the DBii F50N and the links are now rock solid with no other changes.

However YMMV. There are so many variables involved you really need to work out what works best for you.

martini, bandwidth test is not any measurement for cloud core router. this was made 10 years ago, for routers of that time. I suggest you use something more serious, like the new Traffic generator. Or real traffic. You currently only use one core. Hi Normis, Maybe remove btest from RouterOS, and ha...

Thanks for this Normis.
Very useful.

Guys, cool down before it gets personal :) I understand both opinions, and mine is somewhere in between. Very important is the existence of the CCR, which shows MikroTik's wish to enter the market they were not before. At fist, please consider me a true MikroTik lover. I can close my eyes on many s...

No news about the BGP route cache bug fix ? Sadly thinking in drop my CCR order, and get back to my linux box if can't get Mikrotik do the job. Any advice on this ? It is issues like this that show the true cost of running Mikrotik routers. This issue has existed in all 5.x releases and is in core ...

Anyone try last ROS 6 rc to see if the bug is still present ? Unfortunately we cant take the risk on production networks :( Mikrotik are fully aware of this issue and have acknowledged it, but they have not provided a timeframe in which it will be fixed :( We are happy to test new routing code, und...

i see the routing table bug as well. entry's don't go away for routing mark till a reboot of the router is done.

please fix or allow flush command.

running 5.22

Yes we have seen this too when using Route Marks with L3VPN.

Hopefully it gets fixed in the very near future.

Kwality craftmanship

There is no update for this problem.

You will need to use workaround as suggested above.

Ok you both. I did the test as described, and had no issues. Please tell me what I did wrong: Hi Normis. For us this only happens after 3days to a week of the router being up and under heavy use. Generally it is triggered by The Dude polling the mipsbe router. I will set up a lab and replicate this...

Here's the steps that will reliably spin up the flash: Using my config (or any other it seems) do the following: On a computer on the WIFI AP load up high-bandwidth, multi-stream traffic (I use debian CD ISO torrents). Once it's running, snmpwalk the router. About halfway through (right before it c...

Normis. That is an improvement but the metal fingers will still eventually wear through the cord. The clip like I have suggested has no possibility of this happening and it holds the plug in securely. It also simplifies your die design and can be used across multiple product lines easily. You could ...

This is my suggested solution

uploadfromtaptalk1354751487867.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1354751447653.jpg

Sergejs took photos of my suggested solution at the AU MUM. It uses a normal external barrel conector, with a slot in the mwtal casing on each side. A small plastic retainer then slides over the cord and locks in to the slots in the casing holding the power plug in securely. Mikrotik could use this ...

nz_monkey,
- Do you have the same problems with Winbox?
- 6.0rc4 Netinstall? Have you tried different computer?

- Do you have the same problems with Winbox? - Yes
- 6.0rc4 Netinstall? Have you tried different computer? - Not yet, but netinstall of 6.0rc3 and 5.22 work perfectly

I am unable to generate a supout.rif from the RB433UAH to send to Mikrotik. I also notice if I connect to the serial console, I can login but as soon as I try any command it very briefly displays something about a console crash and returns to the login page. I also tried to do a netinstall on to a R...

I have just discovered another bug. During some testing of a dual border router, dual provider setup with OSPF re-distributing a default route between the two border, I discovered that the default route being re-distributed in to the OSPF is being received according to the OSPF routes tab, but does ...

I previously had 6.04rc4 from the private section on Mikrotik.com. I updated to the rc4 release from the main page, and now CPU on my RB433UAH is 100% immediately after boot. The two main processes are Wireless and Console. Each using 47-48% each constant. I am generating a supout.rif now and will l...

One step closer!

It is nice to see DHCP getting some love

Hello nz_monkey, Just checking but you mean the issue WILL be fixed right? Do you know something about when that new package will be avaliable? tks Hi jthiele, I have no idea when this will be fixed, I am guessing the answer is "When it's ready". Maybe Maris(MRZ) or Janis from Mikrotik ca...

Aparently this issue is fixed in the new routing package.

It is disappointing it is taking Mikrotik such a long time to fix such a visible, repeatable and widspread fault.

We have a large number of RB1200's in the field, mostly running 5.16 and no issues. We run mpls, vpls, pppoe, pptp, bgp, ospf, snmp and hotspot all without fault. The Sextant/RB711 with NV2 also work well for us even with high interferance. Maybe your problems are configuration or something network ...

we are working on "fast path" for firewall too. we will publish more detailed tests in a few weeks

Best news from Mikrotik this year

750GL, 750, SXT G, 711G, 2011 will be added in v6rc4

Sweet.

It only works on CCR. And yes your module needs DDMI.

From what I have been told this may be added to RB2011 in future hardware revisions.

yes, CCR have DDMI support.

Thank you!!!!

Does the CCR-1036 support DDMI from SFP modules ?

If we could now have the FastReroute-MPLS Feature this would bei a good mpls base

+1

We really need this !

This requires DDMI support. The RB2011 does not have this.

Im seeing it on a couple of mipsbe routers. Also pptp tunnels are unroutable when this happens

Does anyone else have issues with disappearing interfaces on 6.0rc3 ?

I think they should charge for The Dude. This could be a good model 10 devices for free (will still let people trial it, and small deployments use it) Over 10 devices USD$1 per device per year, purchased in packs of 10 devices If Mikrotik have a reasonable pricing model, and had 500 customers each w...

In the peers remote address, simply put an IPv6 address instead of an IPv4 one , then click on the "Advanced" tab and make sure only IPv6 is ticked.

Hello

full IPV6 support in BGP and especially being able to setup IPV6 address for peers is nowdays a MUST HAVE
upstreams and peering points uses dedicated session for IPV4 and IPV6

best regards
Thierry

This is already possible in v5. We have IPv6 peers in production for around 10 months now.

Yes this is a very annoying problem and one of the reasons we dont use IPSEC on RouterOS.

I posted a script that flushes the stale SA's in the main thread about this problem.

In my opinion, the Mikrotik is GREAT for many things.... but IPSEC is not one of them, unfortunately... at least not for me.

+1

vmxnet3 driver will lower host cpu usage.

All existing problems will be addressed. Please list improvements that are currently missing and you would like to see. Hi Maris, I have heard a few different variations of what is happening with routing in RouterOS v6 from Mikrotik staff. I have heard there is "new" routing coming in v6 ...

I would much rather have a stable, usable peoduct than a rushed one.

I have recently added a 5th level to our Queue Tree, I noticed once I had done this that the stats for the 4th level in the queue tree were no longer updating, and traffic did not appear to be being queued at Level4 any more. After disabling the 5th level, all goes back to normal. Is this a bug, or ...

Well we do listen to your wishes. Just sometimes implementing them takes longer than expected

There is still hope!

I need of CoA on PPPoE! This is the right solution to manage PPPoE users than SSH.

You and everyone else !

WOW!

+1

Good article. And its really good to see fast path

Extreme Networks make a box for exactly this.

See http://www.extremenetworks.com/products/E4G-200.aspx

From Marketwire http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tileras-tile-gx-processor-family-expands-with-a-9-core-offering-providing-unparalleled-integration-and-performance-at-under-10-watts-2012-10-10 Tilera(R) Corporation, the leader in manycore general purpose microprocessors, today announced availability...

I would go with EoIP. It is nice and simple and it scales reasonably well.

VPLS will be much easier to maintain for larger numbers of endpoints as it can autoconfigure via BGP signalled vpls.

- Put the WAN port in VLAN20 (using the switch chip) so that the physical WAN port is at Layer 2 - Create a virtual interface VLAN10 for the internal LAN (192.168.0.0/24) - Create a virtual interface VLAN20 which will receive DHCP from the ISP (as it is in the same VLAN as the WAN port) - NAT (masq...

As I mentioned we will think of something but not in the way you have groups in, for example cisco.

Like JunOS ?

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/j ... peers.html

BGP groups most likely will not be implemented, but we will think of some way to make configuration easy if you have peers with common settings. Some of common parameters can be set in instance. That's a shame :( BGP groups are a very very important feature if you're taking part at large IXes, like...

Search found 2096 matches