Most RouterOS code is not dependent on the device it is running on.The symptoms of the global variables now appear again in an hAP ax3, something is not being done right in the RouterOS code, they reintroduce bugs that were solved at least in the RB750Gr3.
I think it is quite clear what he wants. And in general I do not like the "why would you want that??" approach to answering questions.Yes, but without a concrete example, can't be clear what the user want do....
When the power gets cut, I notice it for other reasons. So I would first fix that before posting on a forum that my new device has a problem.Doesn't traffic get disrupted on your devices when power is cut ?
How odd ...
Well, "powered hub" that is usually something in the "cheap crap Chinese computer add-on" category and it is probably less reliable than your router.May I ask why? (I am too inclined to use it as is.)
More than 10 years later, has it already been considered or even worked on?As far as I know not supported. But it is a good feature request.Is BGP Route Flap Damping (RFC 2439) implemented?
RB4011 and L3HW ??? What???Still issue on rb4011 with rc3 with vlan and l3hw
That is a good joke!Main point (and I see this return on many threads where performance issues are being reported) is to make sure your chosen frequency is CLEAR from interference by other APs.
Ask that in the topic about "Full-Cone NAT"... those people seem to have a use for it.But in what real-world use-cases should I select this new option over the "normal" SNAT or Masquerading action?
Once you have bundle package, it will remain when you upgrade via the "check" button.6.49b22 is not off-factory, I think ?Indeed, unfortunately for a long time the units have been shipped with "bundle package".
Yeah it is idiotic that the number of posts, time of joining the forum (and location) is displayed with every post. People can look that up in the profile.But all the white empty spaces in post are annoying as well.
As expected (feared), the count is before route filtering, whereas in v6 it was after route filtering.*) bgp - show approximate received prefix count by the session;
******** maintainers that blame all problems on styles...What is the justification for removing the default style.
No, blog = https://blog.mikrotik.com/blog = new help docs?
Blog? I did not know it still existed...Blog entry following soon
These days, on my home router the traffic volume ratio is about 40/60 for IPv6/IPv4.Give specific numbers, how much IPv6 are you routing
I don't see it in your config. You need to have an /ip/ipsec/identity configuration.So RouterOS is choosing the proposal of site1, instead of roadwarrior, although site1 has a remote id matcher configured.
For sure it is. But it depends on the connected clients. It may well be that your modern clients on 5GHz have no problem, and the old crap or IoT devices (ESP based) have problems.I am not so sure about that.Disabling WPA3 should eliminate PMKSA error, as it is WPA3 related.
What did you configure w.r.t QoS and what problems do you have? I presume it isn't related to qos-hw.Sadly I've had to downgrade to 7.9 due to problems with QOS.
If only MikroTik would do that themselves. I.e. finish the unfinished features in v7 before starting a new one.P.S. Please stay on the topic!
Maybe not this hardware, but actually some of the SoC do implement PPPoE hardware offloading, as it is a common use case for consumer routers.aditionally i am not sure PPPoE Server can benefit of L3 Hardware Offload at all
That is probably just as string as distributed in the package, not the result of a function that is running on the device itself...BTW, another place to adopt:Code: Select all[admin@MikroTik] > :put [ /system/resource/get build-time ] May/09/2023 10:38:53
You are also thinking that "rx drop" indicates a problem?Also showing dropped packets making it unusable on RB4011iGS+
Most likely the config is wrong and it happened to work.I got IPv6 working but I am not sure why things worked in 7.8 and earlier releases, but I had to make a change to get it working in 7.9.
Yes, it is more interesting to see the CPU load figures under typical load than the "speed test maximum speed"...The route caching from 6 is gone in 7, so any traffic that would benefit from that (speed tests) will suffer as a result.