Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 248 matches

by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jan 05, 2018 3:25 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Interface/Bridge#IGMP_Snooping Reading Wiki and reading Questions here on the Forum. As there is no version setting for IGMP snooping I assume it's on IGMPv2? or is it IGMPv3? It can't be IGMPv1 still? As you se the Confusion is obvious and there is a ton of oth...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Jan 04, 2018 3:32 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: CCR1072-1G-8S+ BGP Locking Up
Replies: 11
Views: 4504

Re: CCR1072-1G-8S+ BGP Locking Up

Speculating here but: This sounds not so strange removing the queue will probably do (void, null) on all packages thats are currently in the cue. rendering lost packets for the affected flows and you depend on higher level protocols to recover. Is it the same effect if you pause a queue and then del...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Users default to no password, and no way to detect it!
Replies: 4
Views: 2922

Re: Users default to no password, and no way to detect it!

There is no problem in the current implementation but there is also not possible to list all users with "full - admin" access and check if the password is set or not.
This makes problems in the Auditing land.
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Dec 31, 2017 4:00 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: How To Limit ICMP Packets Count !?
Replies: 7
Views: 12461

Re: How To Limit ICMP Packets Count !?

ICMP is a protocol that is needed in core routing.
You should not spend cpu resources on firewall rules for that....


ip settings set icmp-rate-limit=10

Or what ever limit is valid in your env.
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Dec 31, 2017 2:51 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP traffic out peer priority
Replies: 6
Views: 4794

Re: BGP traffic out peer priority

I like to put it this way: Internet is Asymentric end of discussion. A Router is only using forward lookup (not considering security features, only routing). In BGP you tell Internet how it may reach you. The full view of internet you got when you are multi homed is YOUR view on the internet as a wh...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Dec 31, 2017 2:28 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP bug - subtle but problematic issue with communities
Replies: 24
Views: 5295

Re: BGP bug - subtle but problematic issue with communities

What is the status of this Issue. I have not seen (or possibly missed) anything in the change log's.... Can we wrap up 2017 with an update on where we stand?
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Dec 29, 2017 2:51 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

Go under MPLS and under Forwarding Table. You'll notice two counters for the same thing. One is Bytes and Packets, the other is Hw. Bytes and Packets. I believe that's where you'd look. Also *PLEASE* let me know of your results. I am very interested in seeing this. Here it Goes... YES! It show only...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Dec 28, 2017 6:49 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

I have a lab with CRS317-1G-16S+ switches in core network as P routers. With L3 Only links routed within the IGP (OSPF). MPLS is enabled and LDP is distributing lables. Only real traffic entering the switch would be mpls not counting ospf that is cpu bound and probably LDP to but the datapath for re...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Dec 24, 2017 12:33 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

Please send report to support@mikrotik.com explaining the problem you have and including supout.rif files This is funny !! Can you please explain, when Mikrotik will amend the CRS3xx releases, so that the supout.rif not gets written to volatile memory, but onto flash instead ? Because if the switch...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Dec 24, 2017 12:22 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

dksoft, anuser, msatter, alexsolovyev, blackbox100, JimmyNyholm - Please send report to support@mikrotik.com explaining the problem you have and including supout.rif files rajo - Does the same issue appear if you set bridge mode back to "none"? panosla - Please note that RouterOS version ...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request: Static DNS NXDOMAIN
Replies: 11
Views: 5549

Re: Feature request: Static DNS NXDOMAIN

Remember that you are incontrol of your own routing domain. Pick an IP from any rfc based internal adress and sinkhole it in your setups this way you may send all unwanted traffic there. And you may later on connect monitoring to get tripwire stuff in action reacting to stuff happening in your netwo...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:25 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Multiple AS on single router, possible?
Replies: 3
Views: 1316

Re: Multiple AS on single router, possible?

Thank you very much for responding. One more thing I'd like to clarify, any traffic originating from any of the downstream ASes destined towards AS111111 will have both the ASes in the AS path.. right? thank you, To answer that question please show setup. If you have two AS and if you do wish this ...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:14 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

Upgraded RB2011, hAP, wAP ac, cAP and a RB1100 without issues. But wondering if there is a new way of how I should handle bonding interfaces with vlans? Currently I have two bonding interfaces with two ethernet ports each. On each of the bonds I have severals vlans and the vlans are put on a separa...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:53 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

I Posted this question in the 41RC channel but I did not get an answer: Now Looking at the released version of 6.41 of RouterOS. if i set: /interface bridge port add bridge=bridge1 frame-types=admit-only-untagged-and-priority-tagged interface=ether1 pvid=64 And then look in the switch menu: The sett...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:49 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41 [current]
Replies: 304
Views: 140814

Re: v6.41 [current]

How the conversion works when there are two switches in the device and both are in the common bridge? What if there are multiple switch groups within one switch differently bridged with other interfaces? I have thought of this to and if I may speculate: The new bridge per say will use hardware offl...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:11 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

CRS317-1G-16S+RM is powered by a next generation switching chip, giving you wire speed performance for all sixteen 10GbE ports with any Ethernet frame size. New features such as hardware-based Spanning Tree Protocol and Link Aggregation (LACP) provide enhanced protection and true professional perfo...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: HW Offload CRS 2 bridges
Replies: 5
Views: 3566

Re: HW Offload CRS 2 bridges

I do understand but need to ask: Is this by current design in new bridge implementation? Or is it by, how you need to set up the tables in the switch chip? As in: Is it Possible but not implemented or is it a hardware limit and can't be done?
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [exploit-db.com] MikroTik 6.40.5 ICMP - Denial of Service
Replies: 16
Views: 6566

Re: [exploit-db.com] MikroTik 6.40.5 ICMP - Denial of Service

Description: This could allow attacker(in your lan) to exhaust all available CPU and crash the kernel via a flood of ICMP packets with forged source IP addresses associated with the public Internet without fast connection. If you launch the exploit with local IP addresses, the router can handle the...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:13 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

In this new bridge implementation what is Actually correct. [admin@MikroTik] /interface ethernet switch port> print Flags: I - invalid # NAME SWITCH VLAN-MODE VLAN-HEADER DEFAULT-VLAN-ID INGRESS-RATE EGRESS-RATE 0 sfp-sfpplus2 switch1 secure leave-as-is 1 5.0Mbps 15.0Mbps 1 sfp-sfpplus3 switch1 secu...
by JimmyNyholm
Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:48 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Proper application advice for ospf
Replies: 2
Views: 1277

Re: Proper application advice for ospf

If you will use RouterOS MT's on both ends go with /32's and reuse the same lokal IP on all interfaces on one device. That way you have no IP spill at all.

In the interconnecting path to other brand then /30 nets to them is what is needed but in that path ONLY.... MT2MT use the powers of the OS.
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Dec 09, 2017 2:03 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Blocking Private ASN inbound
Replies: 7
Views: 2939

Re: Blocking Private ASN inbound

So i changed the rule to add action=discard bgp-as-path="^(6451[2-9]|645[2-9][0-9]|64[6-9][0-9]{2}|65[0-4][0-9]{2}|655[0-2][0-9]|6553[0-5])_*" chain=XO_In Just a quick thought isn't the ^ in your regexp anchoring in the beginning of the string? use a $ at the end for searching at the end ...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:46 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.40.5 [current]
Replies: 82
Views: 42895

Re: v6.40.5 [current]

CRS317-1G-16S+ switch menu shows no ports is this normal?
by JimmyNyholm
Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:04 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

New bridge implementation need: Hardware LACP bonding. Hardware setting per port of learning mode for mac-adresses max number and what to do when max is reached and or port/device restarted. per port ingress and egress hardware rate limiting. dhcp snooping with guard arp snooping with guard Option t...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:01 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: CHR suggestions for new functionality
Replies: 157
Views: 58121

Re: CHR suggestions for new functionality

Please add Metarouter
VM inside VM? Are you serious?
Servers have had hardware support for this for ages. It is actually not as bad as it first sounds, but as always it depends on the application.
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:26 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP, OSPF, SNMP, Winbox.... QUEUEs
Replies: 0
Views: 938

BGP, OSPF, SNMP, Winbox.... QUEUEs

Hi I'm going out of my comfort zone here and need your help or advice. Having MT as CPE on customer that is out of blue using all avail bandwith (witch they should be able to do) renders protocols and management tools erradic to say the least. I thought I may ask what is your recommendation as to qu...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Nov 10, 2017 11:34 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

When do we get LACP with Hardware offload in this new bridge implementation in routeros on switch devices such as CRS326-24G-2S+ and CRS-317-1G-16s+
Creating a bond and attaching it to the bride is done in software now and good know the cpu's in the switches is weak as hell.
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:38 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS MAC address learning problem
Replies: 11
Views: 6339

Re: CRS MAC address learning problem

It works from command line interface, but the input field in Winbox is not fixed yet. It will be done soon.
Any chanse this comming to CRS317 but I want to set the limit to say 5 per port?
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Nov 05, 2017 2:44 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF cost on dynamic interfaces
Replies: 7
Views: 6301

Re: OSPF cost on dynamic interfaces

12:48:39 script,info Interface to remove: *f00135 12:48:39 script,info Interface ID: *14;Interface ID: *15;Interface ID: *16;Interface ID: *1019E238 For what reasons command "find interface=$interface" returns all interfaces? What's wrong? My board is RB1100AHx2 and version is 6.40.3. I'm...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Nov 05, 2017 2:29 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request: Hardware NAT
Replies: 20
Views: 11443

Re: Feature Request: Hardware NAT

But wait NO.... Don't get me wrong here. I'm all for doing stuff in asic/fpga instead of cpu... But providers doing NAT?! Please don't IPv4 space is scarce I know but: Please make IPV6 work so we may sooner then later shut down ipv4 and be gone with all nat that is breaking all kind of protocols. We...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Nov 05, 2017 12:18 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.40.4 [current]
Replies: 103
Views: 45644

Re: v6.40.4 [current]

But Mikrotik changed something in ROS, because till version I could setup OSPF with: - network type: broadcast - network x.x.x.x/24 backbone But now I had to modify my configuration due to version over 6.40.0 as below: - network type: point-to-point - network x.x.x.x/32 backbone And the question is...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Nov 04, 2017 4:32 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Winbox 3.11 released!
Replies: 94
Views: 360652

Re: Winbox 3.11 released!

Jimmy, I did /ip neighbor export on one that works and one that doesn't and they both show up as discovery=no? SO they appear to be the same there anyway. The interfaces that you need the router to be found on should not be in list as discovery=no. /ip neighbor discovery print will print you all in...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:41 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Advanced BGP Setup
Replies: 4
Views: 2501

Re: Advanced BGP Setup

And chains can point to chains in the matching process....
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Nov 03, 2017 4:27 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

What's new in 6.41rc50 (2017-Oct-30 10:13): *) radius - limited RADIUS timeout maximum value to 3 seconds; do not do this, our system on average 1~5 seconds to process the radius package please leave this field customizable +1 we are using OTP that validates a bit slow sometimes we want 10 seconds....
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:44 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Paid VPN service Nord VPN
Replies: 13
Views: 13893

Re: Paid VPN service Nord VPN

Hello, thank you for using NordVPN service. OpenVPN will not be possible to set up due to technical reasons - our service does not use user certificate for the authentication. Nevertheless, it would be a shame if you could not use great features that we offer due to the setup issues. That is why we...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Ipsec Site to Site, again...
Replies: 14
Views: 4235

Re: Ipsec Site to Site, again...

I Could say that everyone so far have missed the real question. What do you want? IF you want traffic from both network should route with out any nat. (Then add routes, rules and make nat rules tighter so they only trigger on wan destined traffic and not ipsec tunnel traffic) IF you want an office i...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Firewall filter rules to allow incoming IPSec packets - are they really needed?
Replies: 4
Views: 3914

Re: Firewall filter rules to allow incoming IPSec packets - are they really needed?

ISAKMP Ike is Using udp500 to handle key setup (This is only needed if you use ike) NAT-T Traversal UDP Encapsulation is using UDP4500 (This is only needed if you need to support NAT) IPSEC can't function over NAT. Here UDP Encapsulated IPSEC packets may be used. Depending on what types of IPSEC you...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:21 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: best path choose wrongly
Replies: 9
Views: 2498

Re: best path choose wrongly

see one of my upstream is ddos protected and the other one is not. i announce /23 to my primary upstream and announce 1x /24 to my ddos protected upstream(because i want one of my 24 will be ddos protected and the other one keep in primary uplink) but right now when i send test attack to my /24 i s...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:57 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hardware offload for Vlans using the bridge ports on CRS212 does not seem to work? /interface bridge add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge1 add igmp-snooping=no name=bridge2 /interface vlan add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan100 vlan-id=100 add interface=sfp10 name=sfp10-vlan101 vlan-id=101 /interface b...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:03 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: 16/32/48 ports
Replies: 51
Views: 28465

Re: 16/32/48 ports

ok, working on it
horray.. :D

thanks MikroTik.
but no promises! I'm just saying we will consider the possibilities
We Need Fiber Dense ie: 40 sfp and 4sfp+ line rate. Aggregate 40 1g fibers to 4 10g fibers. redundant psu's like CRS317-40S-4S+RM / Dualbooting routeros and switchos offcource.
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:35 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Winbox 3.11 released!
Replies: 94
Views: 360652

Re: Winbox 3.11 released!

I have a dozen or so RB3011 routers in service and have GRE tunnels to each from our main location. But when I open Winbox there are a couple of routers that do not show up in my router list, either by MAC or IP address. As far as I can tell they are set up like all of the rest, but those two don't...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:27 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.40.4 [current]
Replies: 103
Views: 45644

Re: v6.40.4 [current]

Did the handling of default routes in OSPF change from 6.40.3 to 6.40.4?! We upgraded everything from 6.40.3 last night. All routes are distributed as Type 1, and with the devices in question, all links have the same default cost (10). But for some reason, after upgrading to 6.40.4, some of our rou...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:19 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

In RouterOS v6.41 everything QinQ related has to configured with bridge "vlan-filtering=no" using VLAN interfaces and their "use-service-tag" option.
And if one do that all qinq switching will get software switched or what?
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Oct 19, 2017 6:08 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: RouterOS (v6.39.3, v6.40.4, v6.41rc) NOT affected by WPA2 vulnerabilities
Replies: 58
Views: 150591

Re: RouterOS NOT affected by WPA2 vulnerabilities

You can fix the 4-way handshake issue either at the client side or at the Access Point side. ... So it's good practice to also fix it at the AP side:-). Wrong!!! KRACK is a pure client-side attack. Patching AP will give you nothing. Worse!!! Patching AP will just give some people false sense of sec...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:06 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OID's BGP session status
Replies: 6
Views: 4280

Re: OID's BGP session status

MT will correct me if I'm wrong but there is what's in Version6 snmp taken from the wiki. MIBs used in RouterOS v6.x: MIKROTIK-MIB MIB-2 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB IF-MIB IP-MIB IP-FORWARD-MIB IPV6-MIB BRIDGE-MIB DHCP-SERVER-MIB CISCO-AAA-SESSION-MIB ENTITY-MIB UPS-MIB SQUID-MIB Don't See any bgp mib there ...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:56 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.40.4 [current]
Replies: 103
Views: 45644

Re: v6.40.4 [current]

HI
telnet button in webfig not work.

tools - telnet
and
http://192.168.88.1/webfig/#IP:Neighbors.Neighbors.1
button "telnet" and "MAC Telnet"
Are you running MAC with HighSierra? If so you do no longer have telnet on the computer. Brew can reinstall it if you realy need it.
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:45 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: RouterOS (v6.39.3, v6.40.4, v6.41rc) NOT affected by WPA2 vulnerabilities
Replies: 58
Views: 150591

Re: RouterOS NOT affected by WPA2 vulnerabilities

Thanks for fast and clear information.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:46 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 29
Views: 15887

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

+1 Big Transit providers in Sweden Doe's it.
by JimmyNyholm
Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:57 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: IPv6 Settings disables eBGP
Replies: 7
Views: 1849

Re: IPv6 Settings disables eBGP

There are some restrictions with bgp and ipv6 currently but please explain what you do/see. give config example. Give us as much info as possible and we can help you hammer out the problem.
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:43 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP Multihoming with two peers
Replies: 1
Views: 2129

Re: BGP Multihoming with two peers

If you want to influence how other se you anounced routes: add prepends for example. If you want to influence how your own organisation elect between other means identical routes: use weight. Routing on the internet IS asymetric. You may only ASK of others how you want them to reach you but they are...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:22 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Dual band AP for home use, SSID same or different?
Replies: 62
Views: 53579

Re: Dual band AP for home use, SSID same or different?

That Depends. If features such as Bandstearing or BandBalancing and ChannelFly and other stuff is implemented to overcome bad clients with bad roaming in crowed space then I would say Same SSID. Without the mentioned features I would vote for Specific SSIDs for 2 and 5 Ghz. and at the same time vote...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request: BGP dampening
Replies: 10
Views: 6326

Re: Feature request: BGP dampening

+1 This would be very welcome.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:51 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request - DNS txt records support
Replies: 4
Views: 2243

Re: Feature Request - DNS txt records support

And Fetch supports https already unless there is a specific thing you are referring to that it does not specifically do.
Ohh.. Thanks for pointing out. Is it in bugfix yet.... Yes it was... thanks again for pointing that out.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:25 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

In ROS this 6.41rc (38) branch with new bridge implementation with (H)ard ware flag. if I want to use switch chip's filter function. is this rules applied to (I want the Silicon Hardware ones...) /interface/bridge/filter or /interface/ethernet/switch/rule Am I right to believe that the switch menu w...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:42 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Help! Replace Cisco to Mikrotik RB3011UiAS (arm)
Replies: 1
Views: 943

Re: Help! Replace Cisco to Mikrotik RB3011UiAS (arm)

Have you Started winbox trying to replace your config? What it says is that you have a nat all open no security wan outside lan inside with two more black networks behind another router on lan. The design is extremly simple to do, point and click in webb or using winbox gui even mt shell is nice if ...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:04 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF Multi-instance network.
Replies: 2
Views: 1532

Re: OSPF Multi-instance network.

Overlapping require VRF. Vrf is not implemented totally in mt as of yet but depending on what you want to achieve it may be possible. Please Elaborate and ZeroByte and I can maybe help better answer the question.
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Oct 05, 2017 2:07 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Is it me or how do I search for learned mac-addresses with this new bridge implementation. Host table is almost always empty but local mac's but everything works. This has been the same all this 41rc branch.... Is there a way to increase timeout on learning ( I have also asked for the option to disa...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:06 pm
Forum: General
Topic: multiple VLANs one interface from ISP switch vs bridge [SOLVED]
Replies: 8
Views: 3585

Re: multiple VLANs one interface from ISP switch vs bridge [SOLVED]

Add vlan 100 in the mt switch and tag only outside port and cpu. Now that 100 vlan will be sent to RouterOS with vlan id 100. Add vlan interface 100 to bridge1 in routeros add ppoe client on vlan 100 Set what ever L3 ip info and other stuff for lan side making MT L2 shining for the stuff you dont ca...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Oct 01, 2017 11:53 am
Forum: General
Topic: Suggestion: VPN profile selected from radius response
Replies: 4
Views: 3267

Re: Suggestion: VPN profile selected from radius response

Short I have not tested IT. The Wiki States on: ( https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RADIUS_Client ) "RouterOS has a RADIUS client which can authenticate for HotSpot, PPP, PPPoE, PPTP, L2TP and ISDN connections. The attributes received from RADIUS server override the ones set in the default ...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Oct 01, 2017 11:19 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request - DNS txt records support
Replies: 4
Views: 2243

Re: Feature Request - DNS txt records support

I see your point but depending on infrastructure it would perhaps be less secure putting this in the DNS than for say a file on web or ftp server. Pros being DNS is redundant and caching by nature but this pro may even be a con, due to the fact that even though you would reach stuff through any kind...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Sep 30, 2017 8:46 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS326-24G-2S+RM fans
Replies: 20
Views: 16636

Re: CRS326-24G-2S+RM fans

here you can find photos and a small post on the CRS326 and the marvell SOCs used in it. https://tikguy.wordpress.com/2017/08/17/meet-the-crs326-24g-2srm/ 802.1ae MACSec support – to provide effortless link level encryption And it would be nice if RouterOS actually implemented all the bells and whi...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Sep 30, 2017 8:33 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Hw. Offload After reboot I have this in log... hardware offloading activated on bridge "bridge1" ports: wlan1,ether2 hardware offloading activated on bridge "bridge1" ports: wlan1,ether3 But port wlan1 status is inactive and not Hw. Offload... Is is correct? Flags: X - disabled,...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:49 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF router ID
Replies: 5
Views: 1946

Re: OSPF router ID

and set interface to p2p passive. Include ip in the networks tab verify ospf interface up. Done. Hi, for using loopback in ospf network should i use P2p network type ? I just add loopbackip to ospf network as backbone and its come automatically to ospf interface as dnymic passive. thanks The networ...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:36 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

The previous switch settings supported MAC learning limits: /interface ethernet switch port set ether6 learn-limit=1 set ether7 learn-limit=1 Is this feature still available with the new bridge implementation? Not as faar as I can se for the moment.. And while we speak of it would it be Possible to...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 257624

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

An alfa to play in the lab would be most welcome.....
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:59 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF router ID
Replies: 5
Views: 1946

Re: OSPF router ID

and set interface to p2p passive.
Include ip in the networks tab
verify ospf interface up.

Done.
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Sep 19, 2017 8:11 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF across VLANS not making sense
Replies: 8
Views: 10336

Re: OSPF across VLANS not making sense

And enable ospf logging if all else fails.
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:11 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Just to be on the safe side. Running CRS317-1G-16+ On the 6.41rc30 looking in switch menu there is no ports and no switch is that correct? The New implementation is doing "switchy stuff" in bridge section but should I make switch settings in switch section and does that work when Ros doesn...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:59 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS317-1G-16S+RM - VLans not configurable [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 10020

Re: CRS317-1G-16S+RM - VLans not configurable [SOLVED]

Hardware mpls offload look prommising.... think of the system as control plane / dataplane if you have slow cpu but some memory you can run protocols and get ldp running in the "control plane" but ingress and egress processing would be soly mpls label switching one will have to se what is ...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:14 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS317-1G-16S+RM - VLans not configurable [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 10020

Re: CRS317-1G-16S+RM - VLans not configurable [SOLVED]

I want to use RouterOS due to wanting to have one management experience. And using it as mpls lsr doing hardware routing/switching purly based on mpls tags. Backbone functionality such as igp and ldp (control plane stuff) would then be handled by the cpu but that should not be any problem as all dat...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Log Server
Replies: 11
Views: 5229

Re: Log Server

i've been asked to create a log server and save customers activity to it what type of software i need to get this job done i have to keep the activity based on specific ip address and by PPPOE username any help about such thing new to me is appreciated thx And just to say to get the jobb done if co...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Log Server
Replies: 11
Views: 5229

Re: Log Server

500MB is quit a big log file. I have some Mikrotiks, Windows server, Linux Server. IP Phone, some Axis camera, UPS and some other stystem. All i logged inn to Splunk. When install, you get full version for one month, to test all functions. After that you convert it to free lisenes. You only need to...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:32 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: CHR re-enabling DHCP client on each reboot
Replies: 6
Views: 3175

Re: CHR re-enabling DHCP client on each reboot

The new ova should be right have not tested it. but with my earlier chr's it was a must to convert to scsi to get config written to disc survive reboots.
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 17, 2017 11:27 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS317-1G-16S+RM - VLans not configurable [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 10020

Re: CRS317-1G-16S+RM - VLans not configurable [SOLVED]

Ports is empty in winbox and cli for the latest RC as well.
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 17, 2017 11:25 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Problem CPU CHR 100 % whit 27 GHZ xeon processor
Replies: 36
Views: 14609

Re: Problem CPU CHR 100 % whit 27 GHZ xeon processor

I tried CCR1072-1G-8S +, 100% cpu with various continuous ppp disconnects, removed after 10 min For network instability Are you updating your igp or even worse egp with every pppoe connect/disconnect? If so this is where all your problem lie. filter out the samll ppp prefixes and just anounce a agg...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Sep 15, 2017 2:47 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

What's new in 6.41rc26 (2017-Sep-07 13:26): *) crs317 - added initial support for HW offloaded MPLS forwarding; Is this gona be not bridged intefaces can hardware switch depending on label but ldp is running on ip so one would have to configure ip adresses and a routing protocol say ospf to get rou...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Sep 15, 2017 11:24 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

JimmyNyholm - Did this happen when you used 6.41rc28? Yes! admin@MikroTik] > system package print Flags: X - disabled # NAME VERSION SCHEDULED 0 routeros-arm 6.41rc28 1 system 6.41rc28 2 X ipv6 6.41rc28 3 X wireless 6.41rc28 4 X hotspot 6.41rc28 5 X dhcp 6.41rc28 6 mpls 6.41rc28 7 routing 6.41rc28 ...
by JimmyNyholm
Wed Sep 13, 2017 1:51 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Got my first Batch of CRS317-1G-16S+ 's unpacking the first and trying out this test version. Connected Copper (1g) and startet winbox clearing conf. Looking around and tried to change l2mtu. /interface ethernet set l2mtu=10000 numbers=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 Boom ether1 stoped working (...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:01 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Passthrough is not currently supported on SXT LTE and we do not have plans to implement such functionality in near future.
Thanks for the elaboration.

Looking at the SXT LTE device it is the perfect fit for this function. We will buy many more of these units when this is available.
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:32 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPFv3 prefix filtering (distribute list)
Replies: 6
Views: 2226

Re: OSPFv3 prefix filtering (distribute list)

Could be that question was asked how to set their own OSPFv3 filter chains, and answer was that such feature is not implemented. Yes. That was the question. The answer was right one, that is not what is in question. But a proper response would have been something like (ie: not holding back vital in...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:15 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

is there any news about SXT LTE? Your question was already answered! Unfortunately, currently SXT LTE does not support passthrough mode. Normis could you Elaborate. Your answer and Wiki is ambiguous: Saying It's not supported and it can not be done due to hardware limitations. OR It is currently no...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Sep 09, 2017 7:16 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPFv3 prefix filtering (distribute list)
Replies: 6
Views: 2226

Re: OSPFv3 prefix filtering (distribute list)

OSPFv3 routes can be fildered in default OSPF chains. However you cannot change to different chains as it is in OSPFv2. Ohh MRZ! This is new to me as when I asked its not implemented at all. What you now say if i use the default ospf chain (even though i can't point to it in the instance) it will b...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:50 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPFv3 prefix filtering (distribute list)
Replies: 6
Views: 2226

Re: OSPFv3 prefix filtering (distribute list)

We are told that ospfv3 filtering is not to be expected before V7.

Any news on this MT? Is the V7 plan the definitive answer or whats is hindering you fixing filtering for ospv3 deamon?
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:39 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: IPv6 recursive nexthops via iBGP
Replies: 110
Views: 50229

Re: IPv6 recursive nexthops via iBGP

Hi. RR's need not to be in data path (most often aren't) so please consider your own setup before fiddeling with above statement. ahem, the nexthop delivered by RRs was not implying the nexthop in fact is the RR, in fact the nexthop is usually the IP set by "next-hop self" (or similar) by...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Sep 03, 2017 1:31 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: IPv6 recursive nexthops via iBGP
Replies: 110
Views: 50229

Re: IPv6 recursive nexthops via iBGP

Hi. RR's need not to be in data path (most often aren't) so please consider your own setup before fiddeling with above statement.

@Mikrotik please fix IPV6 it is 2017 after all and Ipv4 is getting more and more expensive.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:45 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: SwOS MTU
Replies: 7
Views: 13846

Re: SwOS MTU

Is it me or do we miss MTU Settings?
You´re looking for an option to allow "jumbo frames", i.e. set a higher value for MTU?
Yes thats correct...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:08 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Unfortunately, currently SXT LTE does not support passthrough mode. irghost - What is the question about SXT LTE? Are you referring to Passthrough support? if you do, then take a look at this list: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Supported_Hardware#4G_LTE_cards_and_modems Is there a plan for this or...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:06 pm
Forum: General
Topic: VLAN Q-in-Q mikrotik
Replies: 3
Views: 2920

Re: VLAN Q-in-Q mikrotik

Just create a S vlan on the fiber link
create a bridge add the reciving ethernet port and the svlan as port to bridge.
Done:

untaged and taged ethernet packets will get extra stag over the fiber.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: /tool email
Replies: 5
Views: 1681

Re: /tool email

Thanks for the swift respons. I was fault in my belefs that the smtp was open for relay.
Enable log category made that one clear. And made me painfully aware of what i should have looked at in the first place.

Thanks Again.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:28 pm
Forum: General
Topic: /tool email
Replies: 5
Views: 1681

Re: /tool email

Is it me or is something broken. tool email send complains about to adress not valid (i've written our noc addres with and without " with and whouth <> its an ordinary something@somewhere.se whats the problem with that. Searching in the Logs at the smtp server tells me that the MT has not even...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: /tool email
Replies: 5
Views: 1681

/tool email

Is it me or is something broken. tool email send complains about to adress not valid (i've written our noc addres with and without " with and whouth <> its an ordinary something@somewhere.se whats the problem with that. Searching in the Logs at the smtp server tells me that the MT has not even ...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Aug 17, 2017 11:29 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP not trying to reconnect more than once
Replies: 11
Views: 7968

Re: BGP not trying to reconnect more than once

I've seen it to but then again the other side is passive. if the syn packet get lost then the process is stuck it's not obeying syn timeout and resetting itself and trying again.
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Aug 12, 2017 2:06 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Newsletter 77
Replies: 40
Views: 25407

Re: Newsletter 77

Still no info about CRS328-24P-4S+RM... Looks like we have to keep patient. :o Or what about CRS328-48S-4S+RM Need More Fiber ports with decent ratio on uplink. 1:1 as in 10s-1s+ is good but it's to expensive per port and takes up to much space with to little work done. 1U is expensive in telecom c...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Aug 12, 2017 1:00 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF Overwrites End User Public IP
Replies: 8
Views: 2010

Re: OSPF Overwrites End User Public IP

Hi this is just my gues: 1. You begin your post saying we went from bridge to routed ospf fine: (That is L2 -> L3) 2. Ospf changes traffic source ip's? No tis is not possible for ospf to do it is a routing protocol talking to other routers modifying the local routers routing table. My Conclusion the...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:50 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP not advertising routes
Replies: 7
Views: 5845

Re: BGP not advertising routes

The routes that are recieved will be announced to an Ibgp peer (requiring full mesh of all ibgp routers). Only active will be anounced from i ibgp route reflect perspective when using RR. the ebgp perspective is controlled by the networks statments in the bgp instance. Syncronice controlling that ne...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Aug 04, 2017 12:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: RPKI
Replies: 49
Views: 19977

Re: RPKI

+1 Any day now....
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:58 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

JimmyNyholm, a Cisco trunk port will pass both tagged or untagged traffic depending on the allowed VLAN list assigned to the trunk port (by default all VLANs are allowed). This is the "hybrid" behavior you're describing. Leaving the native VLAN routable on trunks is what exposes people to...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 30, 2017 3:11 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: filter rule for priority of traffic bgp
Replies: 1
Views: 1348

Re: filter rule for priority of traffic bgp

The short answer: You can't! But here it goes once more. Internet routing is asyncronus. BGP is the protocol to tell others how to reach you (Announcements) and others to tell you how to reach them. the soup is called your point of view of the internet and the other ones point of view of the interne...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:52 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)
Replies: 29
Views: 15887

Re: Feature request: BGP flowspec (RFC5575)

+100 RFC's are set, others have it implemented other isp's and transits are providing it we need this to stay on the target with the industry. First support for the new nlri to validate, accept and forward them. Then ability to form rules and actually act and influence traffic flow. But that can com...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: The Dude, v6.39rc test builds.
Replies: 121
Views: 58873

Re: The Dude, v6.39rc test builds.

joanllopart - I'm not sure about Cacti, but in RouterOS - graph is made from 5 min average data rate. What is polling interval in your Dude graph ? We imported from 4.0beta3 where graphs has been working fine. I noticed issues with graphs maybe at 6.38. Now graphs ara wrong, specially when they are...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 29, 2017 1:21 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 209191

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

Vlan is Hard to understand IF you used HP as they use the term tag/untagged (Their Ports are all hybrid and can't be trunk or access from the cisco perpspective.) AccessPort = A port that is only accepting untaged frames on ingress and only output untaged frames on egress. All other frametypes is si...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 29, 2017 12:26 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: SwOS MTU
Replies: 7
Views: 13846

SwOS MTU

Is it me or do we miss MTU Settings?
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 29, 2017 12:24 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: CRS326-24G-2S+RM Where is CRS326-24S-2S+RM
Replies: 3
Views: 3441

Re: CRS326-24G-2S+RM Where is CRS326-24S-2S+RM

Sure 16s+ is about to be released But I was asking for 1Gbit not 10Gbit with standard oversubscription levels 24 -> 20 One 16s+ switch could aggregate 4 24s switches (if we had one) and still have ports available to core connection without inducing Oversubscription in the aggregation layer. I need M...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:55 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF vs BGP route of the same
Replies: 2
Views: 2776

Re: OSPF vs BGP route of the same

All routes learned will be installed. If they are used is a mater of best path evaluation.

instance settings will let you influence all metrics and such but I'm afraid this is a whole other horse read up on OSPF and BGP then will we all be happy to discuss Mikrotik implementation of such.
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 22, 2017 1:10 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Remove non-private AS from incoming prefix or the the outgoing peer
Replies: 4
Views: 1978

Re: Remove non-private AS from incoming prefix or the the outgoing peer

Ugly but: Shouldn't an export to an ospf instance of just the other as routes and then importing them making them IGP originated be sufficent? Just a thougt test in a lab before doing bad stuff in production.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:08 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP Advice
Replies: 10
Views: 3025

Re: BGP Advice

My bgp is working correctly it works perfect. Then it comes down to that probably should split your /20 announcement down to /21's and /22,s and /23's and /24's just to be prepaired for avoiding ddos attacks and such.. That being said create the RR if your now a lir ask your lir to do it. ask your ...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:05 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP Advice
Replies: 10
Views: 3025

Re: BGP Advice

My bgp is working correctly it works perfect. My issue is that if Core 1, 2, and 3, are all online but I loose connection to core 3 from my other two cores. Core 3 continues to announcing its /20 network out to the internet, this it the same /20 that the other cores announce, so inbound traffic hit...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jul 21, 2017 1:07 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: BGP Advice
Replies: 10
Views: 3025

Re: BGP Advice

With out all the questions about: Have you checked this is your peer that.... This is what BGP is. BGP is not a millisecond failover protocol. BGP is a self repairing system for inter as communication. Probably it is the HOLD timer on your peers that making them beleve that you are still there. In a...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: MACSEC and or MikrotikSec
Replies: 1
Views: 3552

MACSEC and or MikrotikSec

I would love to se some hardware L2 encryption when: 1. talking to other mikrotik devices (should be simple clickbox and transparent to all other protocols) but ensures no ears dropping on that link. 2. MacSec implementation for inter brand taks. I think this would be a given extension after we have...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 16, 2017 4:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request - DNS names in IPsec
Replies: 7
Views: 3605

Re: Feature request - DNS names in IPsec

+1.
And by all means make ip-changes and dns updates be reflected into peers and other ipsec related stuff.
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 16, 2017 4:04 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: why prepend/weight not working ?
Replies: 1
Views: 1198

Re: why prepend/weight not working ?

Do your carrier, witch you say is the same for both sites, have a looking glass? If so use that to verify that it actually got the two but it's not a good path. so it wont be told to their peer's and upstream as the carrier is only telling it's best view of internet to others. The information in thi...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:55 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF-DR,backup
Replies: 6
Views: 2245

Re: OSPF-DR,backup

Why not just trash the segment for the three routers. make direct connect from R1-R2, R1-R3, R2-R3 building the triangle. OSPF will then work and behave good. All MT's sure then you may use /31 or /32 's as well. no IP wasting. The segment between is most of the time just a weak link for something t...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:43 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: send prefix only from 1 upstream to transit
Replies: 2
Views: 1527

Re: send prefix only from 1 upstream to transit

I gather that you want to give the transit customer a view of internet and only tell one of your transit providers that the transit customer is reachable through you. If so then: Take the learned routes from your transit customer append them with a community that you staple only transit type A and t...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 15, 2017 12:45 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: CRS326-24G-2S+RM Where is CRS326-24S-2S+RM
Replies: 3
Views: 3441

CRS326-24G-2S+RM Where is CRS326-24S-2S+RM

Hi tik guys. As an ISP and knowing that you aim your products at ISP market. I'm baffled to se all new shiny things come out with copper ports? Who is buildning with copper now days. Please make CRS326-24S-2S+RM for us at a lower price due to not having to supply any interface. We can then populate ...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jul 10, 2017 7:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: What is Google DNS doing here?
Replies: 9
Views: 2263

Re: What is Google DNS doing here?

ISP's all over the world should implement BCP38. We are trying but Mikrotik is hindering us with non working uprf in vrf scenarios. Mikrotik Please You are actually making the internet less secure and prone to spoof by lagging behind...... But then again. All should at least do what they can, where...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:02 am
Forum: Scripting
Topic: Syntax highlighting and completions for Sublime Text
Replies: 41
Views: 81994

Re: Syntax highlighting and completions for Sublime Text

I'm happy to introduce the missing support for syntax highlighting and completions in the Sublime Text editor.
Just tried it.... Sweet exactly what the doctor ordered....

Thanks!
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 08, 2017 11:55 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Redistribute static route to OSPF with filter
Replies: 1
Views: 1541

Re: Redistribute static route to OSPF with filter

Routing filter add your filter to ospf-out or what ever filter list you have selected on the ospf instance. The best is not to import just add networks and set the interfaces to passive. If the routes are next hops that wont work and you will need to edit ospf instance and select redistribute static...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue May 16, 2017 9:52 am
Forum: General
Topic: Which types of ports would you like to see for a high speed router
Replies: 179
Views: 59329

Re: Which types of ports would you like to see for a high speed router

Let's not forget that QSFP and QSFP28 both support breakout or fanout cables. And Dont forget: QSFP28 can do: 1-4 x 10 1-4 x 25 1-2 x 50 1 x 100 SFP28 can do: 1 x 10 1 x 25 QSFP+ can do: 1-4 x 10 1 x 40 SFP+ can do: 1 x 10 1 x 1 All speeds and breakout combinations should be supported on all the po...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue May 09, 2017 8:54 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v6.40.rc4 GRE-IPSec SMB
Replies: 15
Views: 4400

Re: v6.40.rc4 GRE-IPSec SMB

One must also ask: Source Media and Destination Media 20Mbyte per second (200Mbit) is about what your average 2" spinning harddrive does after all buffers have been depleted. Allways test network with memory transfers so you test the real performance.
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:17 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.39rc [release candidate] is released
Replies: 390
Views: 139796

Re: v6.39rc [release candidate] is released

!) bridge - fixed BPDU rx/tx when protocol-mode=none

Fixed as in now we do forward all bpdu's transparrently or now we eat all transparrently What is done exactly?
Need to know so we may plan for the changed behaviour.
by JimmyNyholm
Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?
Replies: 613
Views: 257624

Re: RouterOS v7.0 beta1 - when?

+1 Summarized status updates at given intervall is considered good Customer Relations.
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Jan 19, 2017 8:42 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Winbox 3.9 released!
Replies: 35
Views: 30099

Re: Winbox 3.9 released!

both 3.8 and 3.9 do random crashes on win10 x64 home and 100% crash at exiting(instead of correctly closing session). 3.7(and earlier versions) works just fine.
On WIndows Server 2012R2 as well
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:16 am
Forum: General
Topic: IPv6 and NAT - how I changed my mind
Replies: 59
Views: 31190

Re: IPv6 and NAT - how I changed my mind

NAT64 and the companion function of DNS64 is the realizer for us that want to move to the no more nat land. Only 6 Native clients able to talk to all 6 and the small old 4 for these petty sites and services not yet migrated. A Hell Yeah Big +1 from me. I saw the other threads and thought o my good t...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:47 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: Wireless disconnection messages explained!
Replies: 86
Views: 177823

Re:

I'm getting the MIC Failures on several of my clients. Interference isn't an issue on one of them and their signal is -50, ccq is around 99. Client is conecting to a RB112/CM9 using a laptop. Two other customers are using Tranzeo CPE 90's. They connect fine....then out of the blue I see those MIC f...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Radius PAP for Login.
Replies: 2
Views: 2234

Radius PAP for Login.

Hi Mikrotik. Please add PAP support to the radius client at login. It uses chap and is not settable if I read manual correctly. Why some of you may ask? Is'nt chap more secure? Yes but my cents is that I am even more secure and using one time passwords and Hence there is nothing to know beforehand t...
by JimmyNyholm
Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:36 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.38 [current] is released!
Replies: 168
Views: 64134

Re: v6.38 [current] is released!

*) interface - changed loopback interface mtu to 1500; There is no Loopback interface added. If you need loopback interface simply create bridge and do not add any ports to it. (MTU of 1500 is for that empty bridge used as loopback). This is well known to all of us this is why we are asking this qu...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:45 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.38 [current] is released!
Replies: 168
Views: 64134

Re: v6.38 [current] is released!

Hello!

Sorry, what mean
*) interface - changed loopback interface mtu to 1500;
? There is special loopback interface now? Can't find it.

Regards,
Boris

+1 What does it say? Do we have Loopback Interface Now? Cant seem to find either in winbox nor in cli.
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:18 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.38 [current] is released!
Replies: 168
Views: 64134

Re: v6.38 [current] is released!

edit: I was wrong, Mikrotik does support LACP/802.3ad I'm sorry :( ;-) Right. I would not be a customer if they had not supported LACP. On the plus side is that they even have minimum link property for channel up state. I bought the 1036 before 1072 was out and I only use the two sfp+ ports LACP bu...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:36 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.38 [current] is released!
Replies: 168
Views: 64134

Re: v6.38 [current] is released!

patrick7 - Bonding in past reported 2Gbps always. It did not matter if bonding had 2,3,4,5, etc. slave interfaces. Now it will simply report single link speed: *) snmp - always report bonding speed as speed from first bonding slave; For LACP that is Totally Wrong. In protocol less bonding this may ...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:34 pm
Forum: General
Topic: OSPFv3 Filtering
Replies: 8
Views: 4204

Re: OSPFv3 Filtering

Currently you can't, such feature is not implemented.
Care to develop that answer?
"Currently you can't": OK When? Is it planned? What Version will we See it Implemented?
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Dec 30, 2016 5:12 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: MikroTik News December 2016 (Issue #74)
Replies: 94
Views: 38751

Re: MikroTik News December 2016 (Issue #74)

Now there needs to be something like a CRS317-1G-10X-6S+IN ac. Maybe better CRS317-1G-12X-4S+IN ac. Personally I don't se the benefit of coper ports. The benefit of sfp ports is that it should be cheaper to manufacture because no interface needs to be attached. Then you choose what you want and the...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Dec 30, 2016 5:02 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: MikroTik News December 2016 (Issue #74)
Replies: 94
Views: 38751

Re: MikroTik News December 2016 (Issue #74)

- new CRS317 with 16 x SFP+ ports, coming Q2/17 This completes CRS family :D The new CRS with 16 10G will be a very nice start if price/features equals upp. I would then say that this begins the CRS Family. Now we can go forward and do QSFP, QSFP28 (40G (4*10), 100G,50G,25G (4*25G,2*50G)) Moving up...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Dec 30, 2016 4:45 am
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPFv3 Missing /128 Routes in 5.1
Replies: 73
Views: 25704

Re: OSPFv3 Missing /128 Routes in 5.1 - 6.38

Hundred versions and five years later no fix. This year ends with Mikrotik Promising to fix this issue that lasted over 2 major versions in the 3 major that they are eagerly denying has officially been presented as of yet. No internal Alfa exists hence no external Beta exist and no Product with vers...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Dec 29, 2016 4:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: OSPFv3 Filtering
Replies: 8
Views: 4204

OSPFv3 Filtering

Hi I was baffled to se that routefilters is not implementet in OSPFv3. I can put in ipv6 records in my filterlists but not use them in the process is this a joke or am I missing something obvious. The wiki has not a peep on v3 and yet it has been there as long as I have used mt. Please explain to me...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Sep 23, 2016 8:38 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.37 [current] is released!
Replies: 197
Views: 68143

Re: v6.37 [current] is released!

Found a bug a think. Had working bridged ethernet over ip (eoip) with ipsec enabled. Upgrading to 6.37 current phase 1 fail against 6.34.6 upgrading to 6.37RC42 same result downgrading again to 6.34.6 Works again. Secret is defined on the tunnel interface so its using the "auto ipsec" feat...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:36 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.37rc [release candidate] is released, only one wireless package!
Replies: 320
Views: 103402

Re: v6.37rc [release candidate] is released, only one wireless package!

*) wireless - "wireless-cm2" discontinued, uninstall it before update; As before: Uninstall Error - can not uninstall bundled package (6) I will try disable and upgrade.... Works. Disable, reboot, upgrade. Please do not write uninstall when that is not possible. or be more specific disabl...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:41 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.37rc [release candidate] is released, only one wireless package!
Replies: 320
Views: 103402

Re: v6.37rc [release candidate] is released, only one wireless package!

*) wireless - "wireless-cm2" discontinued, uninstall it before update;

As before: Uninstall Error - can not uninstall bundled package (6)

I will try disable and upgrade....
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 16, 2016 10:31 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: 16/32/48 ports
Replies: 51
Views: 28465

Re: 16/32/48 ports

ok, working on it horray.. :D thanks MikroTik. but no promises! I'm just saying we will consider the possibilities Redundant Power supplys and SFP's 1:1 ie 20 spf and 2 sfp+ or 40 sfp and 4 sfp+ we have 10sfp + 1sfp+ but we need bigger of the same so save space in closet. and offcourse redundant (p...
by JimmyNyholm
Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request: CAPsManager - roaming
Replies: 80
Views: 39499

Re: Feature request: CAPsManager - roaming

I understand the request and it is a good one, but just wanted to note, that you can already configure access list to disconnect client with bad signal, and the client will then reconnect to the nearest AP If you actually understand the request: why do you sugest using the braindead (drop the clien...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jun 26, 2016 12:08 pm
Forum: SwOS
Topic: Bug ? Same mac diff. VID not work
Replies: 10
Views: 5008

Re: Bug ? Same mac diff. VID not work

The symptom is due to one of your switches is to old and cheap. It doesn't handle mac / vlan / table and thus can't have multi homed connections like that. 1. use proper gear with modern mac table / vlan 2. use only one connection and trunk in between of capable and incapable devices. You may create...
by JimmyNyholm
Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:19 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!

You may be able to accomplish what you want by using GRE or L2TP with hooks to IPSec available in those services. No I can't becaus if I specify crypto on tunnel interface then routeros complaint and localendpoint must be specified. This is truely unintuitive. I do understand that it is because of ...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:21 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!

*) tunnel - added option to auto detect tunnel local-address; Can't Seem to find it? Does it solve changing ip in conjuction of auto ipsec aswell? Otherwise please ad that. Bump... No Comment. Neither Winbox 3.4 nor the CLI is displaying anything on any tunnel interface about this feature. What is ...
by JimmyNyholm
Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:40 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!

*) tunnel - added option to auto detect tunnel local-address; Can't Seem to find it? Does it solve changing ip in conjuction of auto ipsec aswell? Otherwise please ad that. Bump... No Comment. Neither Winbox 3.4 nor the CLI is displaying anything on any tunnel interface about this feature. What is ...
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:45 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!

*) tunnel - added option to auto detect tunnel local-address;

Can't Seem to find it?
Does it solve changing ip in conjuction of auto ipsec aswell? Otherwise please ad that.
by JimmyNyholm
Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:39 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Req: IKEv2 server and client
Replies: 291
Views: 172966

Re: Feature Req: IKEv2 server and client

My 2 Cents is that V7 is a Unicorn. If one read the forum and all that V7 will fix.... Good Dam... No company in history has ever managed to release such a big overhaul. IkeV2 is the new standard in almost all communications between organisations. We NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED it. If not in the V6 branch t...
by JimmyNyholm
Thu May 26, 2016 4:20 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!


Nice!!!

How often is updated?
My question exactly :)
The Only viable sullution should be the TTL and Refresh values specified on each individual record but then again a confirmation on that one would be very much apprechiated as the wiki seldom states new features until very much later.
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:13 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!

If you are talking about not disabling wireless package, then you can not upgrade until you have removed it. From which version did you upgrade? As we were telling in previous topics about other versions, there was a problem with upgrade but it is not an issue of 6.36rc. It was a problem with old v...
by JimmyNyholm
Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:21 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!
Replies: 295
Views: 107442

Re: v6.36rc [release candidate] is released, wireless-fp package is discontinued!

OK So I'm an idiot. Not Reading and just upgrading. What happens if I didn't disable the package?
I have one mAPLite upgraded and now it just boot loops. How do I apply a firmware reset on the unit?