Because.......I agree but just strange it allows it on Sat...
00:00:00-23:59:59
It's ARM like the poster above has said.I see so I have been using the wrong file for uprade ehhhhhhhh ok I will check the architecture and let you know
It's a change to how you need to operate. Sad in the short term I agree but once you adjust your working methods. It will become second nature as it currently is.Thank you for your reply. But it's vary sad...
Where is your budget at? A hAP AC2 could do what you want but so could a CCR1009. Budget plays a part.Which one would be recommended? Small physical size would be good for me...
Yes.So, I have too much firewall rules and/or too much VLAN routing?
Done.I suggest you all write to Mikrotik support, seeing as they clearly don't believe me - based on the fact that they have done NOTHING about this bug in the last 9 months.
Posting here is essentially pointless.
Are you running IP > Cloud ? Would be the "easiest" thing to check at this point as it is a prerequisite.For IntusDave:
Do you have any problem or do you update? I run your script but the script didn't download nothing.
I thank you for your help!
I am using ESXi 6.5.0 u2 with absolutely no issues at all. Is there any reason you have not updated your ESXi installation?I have the following Configuration:
VMware ESXi v6.0.0
That is extremely good news.Yes, we are aware of this peculiarity and we are working also on new routers that have higher power per core, not just many cores.
Have you looked into Queue type PCQ? I thought that would do what you are looking at?Simple queue is perfectly adequate for this. Just use the first tab.
With only first tab is impossible to perform an elementary task in one queue:
set summary limit + set per IP limit
Simple queue is perfectly adequate for this. Just use the first tab. What is it you are trying to limit?Hello,
current Queues has a very large number of settings and a very complex and confusing.
Please add simple speed limiter.
That's why there is also a software option to turn it off.Also dangerous in a lot of situations.
80Ghz may be better suited.Hello world !!!
Does anyone make some test installations wth the wireless wire dish kit, and can show some results ?
I am looking for some hardware for a stable 4,5 km connection. I need ~500mbit/s.
Can these devices provide this ?
TIA
wayne
I hear mumbles of CHR being available from 6.43 so there could quite possibly be x86 implementation.I am also looking forward to have support in x86Will it be available for x86 router soon?
“If I Remember Correctly”What does the IIRC mean? Sorry I dont understand. Is it factory specification?IIRC the max power output for an RB3011 is 0.5A (500ma)
CHR is certainly compatible with ESXi 6 and 6.5(u2).is it CHR not compatible with ESXi 6 ?
Have a watch of this. My very simple way of hair-pinning your NAT.thanks for your help, but I've added my LAN port to the Hairpin NAT and it's still not working