village in 2km , no interference/dsl/cable/or other wisp
population 5000
more then 2000 houses
advise or mark the map for best coverage, i can install equipments anywhere in village or out side the village
Start in the middle and add branches as your clients will grow.
passive or active optical network. 
All of your customers will be happy, the investment is approximately at the same level and you save yourself a lot of headache.
The speed and latency is in another league compared to wireless.
If you go with wireless, in such a small area and with so many potential subscribers, you’ll hit interference and performance problems at the first 50 customers, nevermind 1000.
Don’t see any cars nor electricity lanes. The question is if there are at least some people with computers willing to subscribe the Internet connection. I would not afraid of self interference as nearby houses can share one wifi client by cables. The question is also what bandwidth will be provided in total.
hi
the average require Internet connection is 128kb-256kb . in this area people are new eggs , they are using Edge service on mobiles,
can you please point out the area on map where i install sectors or omni and routerboard models thx.pin the point on map so i install on that point and also tell me best for setup and coverage 90°-120°-160° and 19dbi sector or any other also thanks. 75% population just want use skype.
mate this is not NYC city 
it a rare area 75% population want Internet on mobile for skype viber and facebook
Well,
this is not always easy to suggest a solution. Mainly because you need to count with future expansion.
When you count with let say 500 clients giving them e.g 256/128 with 1:5 aggregation it could mean you need to have 30/15mbit line out. I need to fabulate these figures as you did not provide any even I asked for them.
There are no 5G or 2,4G radios around as you stated before.
Expecting you can have your wan link everywhere. Also expecting the land is flat, no trees, no high buildings. Expecting you have some money to invest.
My way would be to build 120 degree 5G ap points in the four corners of the vilage at some height enough (around 3-5m) over the roofs with slight slope down - as clients should be around axis, so probably below the level of AP antenna. Netbox5, Basebox5 or Netmetal5 would be good. You have also possibility to add one additional wifi card and split the antenna to two in the future, if necessary due to large number of connected clients. Use narrow channel, tune the power to the lowest yet working level in order not to scream too far. Connect close clients with panel CPE devices (like SXT5Lite). As the buildings are very close to each other, use one client with switch per small group of clients connected by wire. Let them use their 2.4G router to connect all their wifi things.
Connect the corner APs to the central point where you have your connection line out, preferably by point-to-point links, each on different frequency (again 2 SXT5Lite will be fine, using some more directional antennas would be better, you can change it in the future if necessary and use the SXT5Lite at clients place). There you need to put your main router - probably something like 1100ahx2 or 850gx2 or ccr1009. All are overkill, but you need to have some reserve for firewall rules processing, mangling, queues and such things that are cpu power consuming.
You can aso sell the home aps (like some RB951Ui-2HnD) and keep the management of them in order to be able to solve future interference problems.
Remember that the best wifi is wire. It means: Use wires everywhere it is possible. Try it even if it is not possible. Simply do everything in order to avoid using wifi.
Invite some experienced person to your vilage to have a look on your environment. I am sure he will make other suggestion to you. And probably better than me as I do not know your situation. Finally you have to think and decide yourself as it is your money, your time and your risk.
Hope I helped you a bit.
Another variant would be to do a utp-ftp-only network, using plain unexpensive switches.
Because the involved distances are so small, the cost would be pretty low (lower than wireless, definitely) and the performance will be much higher than any wireless solution.
However, things to have in mind is how you power those switches (you either need access to 220v ac or if that’s not possible using POE). Every switch should be no more than 130m apart from each other (100m is the maximum recommended standard, but if you use high quality cables you can generally span longer distances, but ymmv).
The issues you might have with this type of installation is the lightning strikes (which you also have with any wireless deployment) and relative lack of management.
If you use routerboards (rb750, 750g, 951 etc) instead of plain dumb switches then you also have management but in the beginning you don’t really need that.
Of course that on top of this you also need a router where you’ll have the dhcp server or the pppoe server and the queues for bandwidth shaping of every customer.
Which model is good for you depends on how much bandwidth you want to offer. For example, I’m pushing 300Mbit through a CCR1009 and it could handle at least double from what I can see in the cpu usage graphs.