Hello gentlemens,
I faced the challenge of doing backup device in case of failure.
I have no idea how to do it and whether it is possible but I would like to try
graphically what I would like to achieve:
ISP1 ISP2
| |
| |
AS 222 AS 444
\ /
\ /
\ /
switch 10G link
| |
| |
port 1 port 2
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
MT GW1<-- ?failover? --> MT GW2
| |
NAT NAT
| |
\ /
\ /
\ /
switch aggregation
| | |
Sw1 Sw2 Sw3
/ | \ / | \ / | \
C C C C C C C
C = client computer connected by UTP
I want to create that TWO of MT have full bgp tables (all prefixs) and if MT GW1 die all traffic takes over immediately MT GW2.
I do not want a typical failover where if MT GW1 die, then MT GW2 it will start downloading bgp prefix which takes quite a long time..
..but that both have full tables already and then, for example, vrrp raised interfaces, eg with some script with the same LAN addressing
it is possible? to do? or maybe a different solution? can you help?
Se você tiver um roteador por trás do BGP fica fácil, criando uma rota default com distância maior saindo para o BGP2, lembrando de não repetir no BGP2 nenhum IP de gerenciamento que for usar no BGP1.
If Google translate good translate your answer in english I still don’t understand it
On that same MT router have LAN and BGP - now how to secure it in case of failure of the first MT
U can use 2 BGP, with all prefixes anounced, dont forgeting to use diferent IPs in each BGP (as in all your network), and having a third router, where will receive all routes and fowarding to your all network. The secret is putting a higher distance administratively distance in to the secondary BGP, and this one contains all routes contained in Primary BGP. I hope you can understand, but it´s works fine!