/32 blackhole redistribute between bgp instances

I have fastnetmon setup and upon detection of ddos it sends /32 with 65001:666 via bgp to my CHR, I have FNM setup as a peer with it’s own instance but for some reason the route doesn’t seem to show when I run /routing bgp advertisements print peer=MYPEER so I’m assuming I have something in the config wrong?

/routing bgp instance print
0 * name=“default” as=myasn router-id=MyIP redistribute-connected=no
redistribute-static=no redistribute-rip=no redistribute-ospf=no
redistribute-other-bgp=no out-filter=HE-OUT client-to-client-reflection=no
ignore-as-path-len=no routing-table=“”

1 name=“FNM” as=65001 router-id=0.0.0.0 redistribute-connected=no
redistribute-static=no redistribute-rip=no redistribute-ospf=no
redistribute-other-bgp=yes out-filter=“” client-to-client-reflection=no
ignore-as-path-len=no routing-table=“”

/routing bgp peer print
0 E default xx.yy.zz.aa 6939
1 E default xx.yy.zz.aa 7018
2 E FNM xx.yy.zz.aa 65001

Here are the relevant filters;

91 chain=FNM-OUT invert-match=no action=discard set-bgp-prepend-path=“”

90 chain=FNM-IN invert-match=no action=accept set-type=blackhole set-bgp-prepend-path=“”

71 chain=ATT-OUT prefix-length=32 bgp-communities=65001:666 invert-match=no action=accept set-bgp-prepend-path=“” set-bgp-communities=7018:86

49 chain=HE-OUT prefix-length=32 bgp-communities=65001:666 invert-match=no action=accept set-bgp-prepend-path=“” set-bgp-communities=6939:666

Thoughts are greatly appreciated!

-TJ

You shouldn’t need a separate BGP instance for fastnetmon. It is a lot better to use the same instance, that is what we do.

I was actually thinking about this, I’m glad you mentioned it.

Do you use your normal (external) AS# for Fastnetmon’s connection to your router? I’m guessing yes otherwise you need a second instance?

Yes we use our external AS for fastnetmon’s connection to the router. It works fine.

Redistribution of BGP routes from one instance to another becomes much more complex and is harder to troubleshoot, and higher chance of encountering weird bugs. In your case, I don’t specifically see anything wrong with your configuration that is that different from ours that would cause problems, except for the separate instances.

Thank you, I will try that.