7.0?

RouterOS General
1

Hi

What you hear on the release of version 7.0 of the system. Since long time we hear that we have to wait for this release. However, there is no information that is in the process of development. I’m beginning to feel that the investment in this architecture was a mistake.
Do you expect the CCR has two the embedded power supply?

2

What specific things do you want to see in RouterOS 7?

Do you expect the CCR has two the embedded power supply?

Several CCR models already have dual power supplies

3

Working quickly and efficiently BGP. Currently, the three BGP peers, the time of recalculation of routes is far from acceptable. The whole is counted on one core, the declaration of support on is to be fixed in version 7 system. I heard it for the first time nearly a year ago - So the question is. When will be released?

4

BGP works on all cores for many versions now. Only the loading of the routing table is done on one core, but when this is complete, all other processes use all cores. The most important tasks have all core support

5

Only the loading of the routing table is done on one core

but this is important tastk … and its loading very very long … :confused:

6

In RouterOS v7 that we have now in alpha testing, CCR loads 15 million routes in approx 15 minutes. A router from a different manufacturer and a very big name, takes nearly twice as long. So future looks bright :slight_smile:

7

As demand from me, I want you to support IPv6 situation in Japan.
For IPv6, 2 types of IPoE system PPPoE and method are present in Japan, if you do not have my support, neither of which, it is not possible to spread the user Routerboard.
With that said do not support IPv6 environment in Japan from actual users, someone is very disappointed.

The wanting compatible with up to about RouterOS version 7 somehow, my hope.

Best regards.

8

When we can expect first 7.0beta to testing?

9

I want to join if it is shown here that I also carried out.

10

Wanted to join the beta too. Having 3 upstream, all full route on CCR1036, time to go multicore routing.

11

I hope the Web UI is much better.
some of my friend say that the Mikrotik Web UI is not user friendly enough.

12

Ooh ooh, I know the answer to this one, mrz just told me:

When it’s ready :wink:

13

what is new beside this ?
I hope we can get more info about the new RouterOS v7

14

I also agree.
I want you to become a mechanism, such as can be a little more custom.
If I only replace the language in json like now, but I think unfriendly user too.

15

It is a further demand after, but I want to raise 3.13 or later kernel for the following reasons.

  • (It is supported by kernel 3.5 ) corresponding to the L2TPv3 over IPv6
  • (For the support of a DoS attack) (it is supported by kernel 3.6) the abolition of the IP routing cache function
  • (It is supported by kernel 3.8 ) support of ECMP of IPv6
  • Corresponding to 802.1ad (q-in-q). (Corresponding kernel 3.10 ) corresponding to the nested structure of the VLAN tag
  • (Has to adapt to Vyatta) corresponding to the VTI over IPv6 as well (such as IP-IP tunnel) Responding to Virtual Tunnel Interface (corresponding kernel3.13 )
16

I would like to have the bugs you said you wouldn’t fix in 6.x fixed, no more than that.

Especially the issue with VRFs with the same IPs (Ticket#2014042266000552) which is almost a showstopper for my whole business…

17

Currently there are no drastic changes, because it is still a long time before v7 is ready for beta

18

is there any plan to make it more user friendly UI ?

19

like adding a button ‘Make everything working’?

20

Hehe, nice one. @Utomo you can’t expect to have a menu like on the soho routers. All this things that you can do have to be configured and for that there need to be lots of menus. It is pretty good structured. Actually there is QuickSet now that can help a home user to configure mikrotik for basic home usage.