Well, I want to configure 750UP only as switch, but when I’m trying to do something it’s not working as I expected.
So. I my network sheme is like that:
internet → wifi_router1 with DHCP [192.168.1.1] → switch1 → 750up [192.168.88.1] → wifi_router2 [192.168.1.251] → wifi_router3 [192.168.1.49] → switch2
To switch1 connected two PCs
and to switch2 connected another two PCs also.
I’m using three wi-fi routers because, there are long cables between them, and wifi area is expanding.
I think I dont need to change setting at ‘IP->Pool’ and ‘DHCP client’ at all, because I don’t want that 750up work like dchp-router,
I want it only split IP’s.
Sorry for bad English,
and soory if something that I’m asking is wrong, maybe I dont understand something in network configuration.
nope. tested it. 750UP won’t work from PoE from ports 2-5, it’s only working from port 1, but port 1 as I see is not a part of switch.
So, may be there is no another way to connect to networks in one single?
My first network works in 192.168.1.* space, and other from routerboard work in 192.168.88.*
I want to connect this two networks to single 192.168.1.*
I tried to set Ip>Pool & Ip>Addresses settings (changed 88 to 1), I tried to setup Ip>DHCP Relay also, but it all not works as I want.
Since the ether1 interface is not part of the switch chip you have to create a bridge.
/interface bridge
add name=bridge-local mode=rstpEither put all ports in the bridge (1-5)
/interface bridge ports
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether2
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether3
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether4
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether5or put only 1 and 2 and set 2 as master for 3-5
/interface bridge ports
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether2
/interface ethernet
set [find default-name=ether3] master-port=ether2
set [find default-name=ether4] master-port=ether2
set [find default-name=ether5] master-port=ether2