ste, this sounds interesting. Can you share your “ATPC” script?
Thanks,
Robert
Maybe also frequency usage scan to file 
Good feature!! I add it to the list
If you want, post the script
Explain the features of this technology
You see 90Mbps in a single radio with 30-50 clients (PTMP) that traffic at the same time ? 
SXT Sector has too low gain, but I think that the RB912UAG-5HPnD-OUT can be used on every type of antenna (45°,60°,90°,120°,360° OMNI, also on PTP link with a 30dB dish) Too many type of antenna to have an integrated product
Very good idea 
You mean something like the “Multi-Lane RF” technology made by ubnt?
I think you can do this using WDS + VirtualAP…right?
WDS can operate like AP and a station
with VAP you can create virtual ssid
On my point one.. there are already these requests
Maybe “channel-width=Any”
I could use this on my 900Mhz cpe.
It allows cpes to send at the same frequency at the same time. So it increases capacity.
I have no 450. But heard this is possible when all cpes have good enough signal for highest modulation.
I guess this would be possible with optimized nv2, too. It is a polling protocol. Why should the amount of cpes reduce the capacity?
This external connectors add loss. Every single connector. So you might get better results with an integrated antenna using fewer different sector sizes.
I dont like external connectors as every connector has to be waterproof and is a point of failure.
it looks the same thing of GPS Sync 
I have to take a look at some explanation of this
technology
I agree with you.
Is only an optimization of the protocol that is missing.
In real conditions the cell (with many users) hardly exceed 25 Mbps of aggregate traffic
So would you ask Mikrotik the creation of integrated antennas for each type of situation? How many and what models?
Or maybe we can ask a single model with angle of radiation (and gain) adjustable? similar mechanism of Airmax Titanium sectors?
/
/system script
add name=ChangeBand policy=ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,winbox,password,sniff,sensitive,api source=":local delais 40s\r\
\n:local liste 5mhz,10mhz,20mhz;\r\
\n \r\
\n:foreach band in=\$liste do={\r\
\n:if (![/interface wireless get wlan1 running]) do={\r\
\n/interface wireless set wlan1 channel-width=\$band wireless-protocol=any\r\
\n:delay \$delais\r\
\n}\r\
\n}\r\
\n"
\
/system scheduler
add comment="" disabled=no interval=40s name="schedcheckWifi" \
on-event=ChangeBand start-time=startup
/system scheduler enable schedcheckWifi
/
The only problem is sometimes the script changes too often, gets stuck in a loop and won’t connect. I set my watchdog address to the AP the radio connects to, if it gets stuck then it reboots and works fine. I’m sure the script can be tweaked to cure this, but I haven’t done it yet. This is not mine, this is the work of myself and several other forum members put together.
No. It allows to decode 2 parallel signals at the same frequency at the same time.
GPS Sync tries to avoid parallel signals.
It would be enough if they make a 60 and a 120 degree model.
Keep in mind. 60 does not end at 60 it has 3db less at 60.
I have very few places where I would place exactly 4x90s. I place Antennas where customers live and they never
distribute evenly around a tower.
Mikrotik should add auto shutdown option like if u use battery when voltage rich 22v/11v should trigger shutdown mode or standby mode if its possible
- or can be implemented in UP models - on low battery should shutdown other equipment attached to device (exp. RB750UP)
- should add also Health graphs /tem.,volt.
- should add ability to recalibrate voltage sensor
Lakis, I opened this discussion to speak only of the improvements that relate to the wireless as you can read the first post (first line)
things you can do already:
-
adjust scan list - enter frequencies only intended for the site, like 2 - 4 channels - super-fast reconnect even on 5GHz band
-
adjust access list rules on AP, there you can set minimal and maximal signal strength that is allowed to connect. On client RouterOS you can adjust connect list, if you have several APs to connect to.
-
lock down what data rates can client device use (RouterOS clients)
-
2-4 channels is not always practical in crowed areas, as you can’t predict what channels will be free 6 months from now unless you are in an isolated area with out many other radios. If there is interference on all the channels you may not be able to reach some clients to give them a new freq list.
-
ACL are ok for small installation but not practical when you have hundreds or thousands of clients. Also in countries with winter you can have large fluctuation in signal strength not to mention the effect of wet snow or ice on trees.
-
Unless thing have change you can’t lock client data rates if you are using NV2.
Unless thing have change you can’t lock client data rates if you are using NV2.
Works just fine , locking data rates needs to be done @ the AP, i lock all clients to a MCS (and basic rate is just 6Mbps).
So in my case is use MCS11 .. clients get 120 or 6 Mbps.. somehow all clients prefer the 120Mbps option 
Need screenshots? , just yell 
Hi janisk is a pleasure to see your interest in the discussion!
In your opinion, could we have some of the changes in the first post in RouterOS?
Are technically possible?
By including these and other changes Mikrotik could become the best system, also in wireless world
Advanced Scanning: Scans all visible proprietary APs and for each (respecting SSID, security settings, connect lists, etc.) connects and keeps track of the SNR, Rx/Tx signal strength, radioName, mac-address and distance.
In a normal scan the TX Signal Strenght and distance is not visible and the results show also all other operators APs
I add it on the list
I haven’t tried all the techniques yet, but I was thinking about using WDS to sync as a work around. nice web forum for nice information.
should be add
link load and nv2/nstreme capacity info in %