any tutorial about bridging rule…???
weks…anyone 
What kind of rules tutorial do you need ?
http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/interface/bridge_content.php#4.14.7
wew finally…well i already read the bridge manual but that dont result anything…in bridge-filter does it same as firewall for bridging..??
Bridge firewall implements filtering for data from to or trough bridge.
is that mean the same as firewall in ip-firewall…??
Yes.
well i try a simple rule in bridge-filter but it didnt work…??
the rule is like this :
interface: in interface-lan1
out interface-lan2
IP : src.address-192.168.10.0/24
dst.address-10.10.15.0/24
Action : drop
lan1 & lan2 is in the same bridge
can anyone help…pliss
Could you provide complete rule or export from ‘interface bridge fiter’ ?
interface-bridge-filter>add chain=forward in-interface=lan1 out-interface=lan2 src.address=192.168.10.0/24 dst.address=10.10.15.0/24 action=drop
note :
i got 4 ether and i bridge all
when i apply the rule the 192.168.10.0/24 still can connect to 10.10.15.0/24…???
is something wrong with my rule…if so please help…thx
hello…need help pliss 
to filter traffic going through your bridge (going from one interface to another) you need to add rules to “forward” chain.
The input/output chains are reserved for traffic going TO or FROM your bridge, as in winbox and routed traffic.
@sten can i delete the bridge (that connected all the ether) and set all the 4 ether with specified ip…with the same subnet..and i want all the 4 ether are connected?? i’ve try this one but all the 4 ether cannt connected!!!
what’s your configuration?
and what do you want to achieve?
okay heres my configuration that i want to achive:
ether 1 - with ip = 10.10.1.1/255.255.0.0 (local) (reply only)
ether 2 - with ip = 10.10.2.1/255.255.0.0 (local)
ether 3 - with ip = 10.10.3.1/255.255.0.0 (local)
ether 4 - with ip = 202.165.x.x (global)
what i want to is all ether can connect each other without to creat a bridge…!!!
thx
Address overlap… they’re all 10.10/16
Well, if you do not create a bridge, then you’d have to route… but you can’t because your network address ranges overlap. Sounds like you’re stuck and need to rethink your network design.
–Tom
so that means i need to bridge, right??
no
you have a fundamental flaw in your design
you need to apply correct subnet masks.
hint: correct subnet masks for the subnetting you chose is 255.255.255.0 but you need to find out how this affects your routing tables.