NAB
July 17, 2009, 2:27pm
1
Hi,
I have a RB411 and a RB411A. If I run a UDP based bandwidth test between them, it works fine…
> /tool bandwidth-test 192.168.42.91 protocol=udp direction=both
status: running
duration: 10s
tx-current: 11.9Mbps
tx-10-second-average: 11.1Mbps
tx-total-average: 11.1Mbps
rx-current: 11.9Mbps
rx-10-second-average: 11.3Mbps
rx-total-average: 11.3Mbps
lost-packets: 190
random-data: no
direction: both
tx-size: 1500
rx-size: 1500
but when I do it with TCP…
> /tool bandwidth-test 192.168.42.91 protocol=tcp direction=both
status: disconnected
duration: 1s
tx-current: 0bps
tx-10-second-average: 0bps
tx-total-average: 0bps
rx-current: 0bps
rx-10-second-average: 0bps
rx-total-average: 0bps
random-data: no
direction: both
The same goes for Winbox - UDP works fine, but TCP just connects and then disconnects immediately.
Any ideas?
InoX
July 18, 2009, 12:28am
2
11.1Mbps it’s not fine…30-70mbps it’s fine
NAB
July 18, 2009, 9:32pm
3
Given that they’re connected by a wireless link, 11.1Mps is fine, thank you!
InoX
July 19, 2009, 10:36am
4
I was talking about wireless too…you did not tell us your setup so no answers for you
SET tcp connections to only 1 to start with…
And limit the local tx value. You are on wireless. If you set direction to “both” on the router that you will also test the process can’t handle it and you get wierd or no results. Just the default settings on “both” directions (tcp) never worked for me…
Try to set low local tx and rx limit first…
NAB
July 19, 2009, 3:25pm
6
If I was asking about link speed, you may have a point, however I was not and so the link method, the antenna used or the colour of my underwear are wholly irrelevant and therefore not mentioned.
NAB
July 19, 2009, 3:28pm
7
Yes, did that - same result.
Again, tried that, but the problem appears to occur during setup and this makes no difference.
Hmm. Interesting. I’ll try the same from an x86 box and also a faster RB and see what happens.
Thanks for your suggestions.